1 / 8

PARAMETERISATIONS OF WET DEPOSITION

PARAMETERISATIONS OF WET DEPOSITION. Ernst Meijer AC3 Meeting 7-8 November De Bilt, Netherlands. AC3.2.1 Precipitation impact on sulphur and nitrogen compounds. KNMI will test different wet removal parameterisations KNMI will provide distributions of wet removal parameters

conway
Télécharger la présentation

PARAMETERISATIONS OF WET DEPOSITION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PARAMETERISATIONS OFWET DEPOSITION Ernst Meijer AC3 Meeting 7-8 November De Bilt, Netherlands

  2. AC3.2.1 Precipitation impact on sulphur and nitrogen compounds • KNMI will test different wet removal parameterisations • KNMI will provide distributions of wet removal parameters • CNRS-LSCE and UCAM-DCHEM will use these distributions • Report Milestones • month 12: description • month 12: KNMI provides distributions of wet removal parameters • month 14: simulations (KNMI only?) • month 18: report

  3. Proposed description • All provide brief descriptions of their wet removal scheme (convective and large-scale) with parameter requirements • Do not implement completely new schemes • Improve current KNMI scheme using new/other ECMWF archived fields, e.g.: • 3-D precipitation fields • overcast cloud cover for below scavenging) • .... • Investigate effect of spin-up time for HNO3 distribution • Investigate effect of on-line / off-line convection

  4. Convective wet removal: ERA40 or operational? • off-line calculation of convective mass-fluxes • archived convective precipitation → poor correlation between convective precipitation and other convective parameters

  5. Proceed with ERA-40 convective fields Problems with too fast circulation in ERA-40! Therefore: Investigate possibility to combine operational data from ECMWF with ERA-40 convective fields Impact studies, using only: • only OD • only ERA-40 • combination of ERA-40 convection with OD Also: Evaluate archived convection fields from operational data for 1 month (April 2003).

  6. Model simulations • KNMI will provide detailed requirements in month 12 • KNMI will provide the necessary fields • Spin-up time (1 year) • 1 year (2003) • coarse and high resolution?

  7. Comparison with observations • Include removal rate of HNO3 in list of output diagnostics for WP3.1 (other diagnostics?) • point-to-point comparison • curtain plots • monthly means • Select campaign data for case analysis

  8. Output diagnostics • Monthly mean distributions of NOy and HNO3 • Monthly mean distributions of SO4 • Monthly mean distributions of wet removal of HNO3 (nmol/mol/month)

More Related