1 / 18

Small Lakes Management Plan: Region 5

Small Lakes Management Plan: Region 5. Small Lakes Committee Meeting Nov. 22-23, 2007. Overview: SLMP. Part I - Complete inventory of R5 lakes (Kamloops template) Identify data gaps (lack of assessment wild stocks…) Identify management challenges: - Water management - Bass.

corby
Télécharger la présentation

Small Lakes Management Plan: Region 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Small Lakes Management Plan: Region 5 Small Lakes Committee Meeting Nov. 22-23, 2007

  2. Overview: SLMP • Part I - Complete inventory of R5 lakes (Kamloops template) • Identify data gaps (lack of assessment wild stocks…) • Identify management challenges: - Water management - Bass

  3. Part II: Management Plan • Part II - Specific management plan (what we’re looking to achieve, quantifiable performance measures, etc.) - Shift in management structure (i.e., manage on an area scale rather than on a lake by lake basis) • Develop 4-5 management “areas” or “zones” - likely base on geographic location • Develop quantifiable performance measures for each “area” - economic (stocked lakes) - management measures (% family, general, trophy) - reference points for effort on wild lakes

  4. Predictive model for stocked lake fisheries in the Cariboo • Regression model approach (GLM) • Similar to a multiple regression - quantify relationship between several independent or predictor variables and a dependent criterion variable

  5. Effort Data • Effort data from aerial boat counts • Included all stocked lakes for which effort data exists since 2000 (69 lakes) • Standardized effort (angler days/ha)

  6. Explanatory Variables • Initial variables: - Sterile - Surface area - Boating restriction - Gear restriction - Stocking rate - Access - Lodge - Campsite - Distance from Kamloops - Biogeoclimatic zone - Bag limit

  7. GLM: Model Function • Conducted GLM using all variables • Ran through AIC procedure - removes variables that are not very influential in explaining variability in angler effort • Repeat above procedure for 100 representative data sets - determine number of times each variable was selected

  8. Variable selection: - Campsite (63/100) - Triploid (53/100) - Gear restriction (53/100) - Surface area (56/100) - Bag limit (58/100) ->high degree of uncertainty of actual influence of these variables in explaining variation in angler effort -> Removed: Campsite, GR, BL, Triploid, and Surface Area variables

  9. Finalized Model • Selected variables: - Access (100/100) - Stocking rate (99/100) - BEC (97/100) - Distance from Kamloops (92/100) - Lodge (83/100) - Boat restriction (75/100) • 65% of variability explained

  10. Lake: Distance from Kamloops = 150 km Stocking rate = 200 fish/ha Factor df log-Coefficient Coefficient Prediction (AD/ha) Intercept 1.17 3.20 3.20 Lodge 1 0.47 1.60 5.13 Access 1 1.25 3.49 17.90 Boat restrict 1 0.85 2.34 41.89 SBSZ (BEC) 7 0.37 1.45 60.64 Stock rate 1 200(0.002) 1.49 90.47 Kamloops 1 150(-0.002) 0.74 67.02 ***All coefficients were significant (P < 0.01)

  11. Benefits of model - Predict results of manipulating different management factors - Detect outliers (lakes that should attract more/less effort given its location and characteristics) ->Identify lakes in need of further work (i.e., biological assessment) - SIMPLE

  12. Current Performance of Stocked Lake Fisheries in Region 5 • Typically measure success in angler days • Need to make economic link -> make most efficient use of minimal resources • Benefit:Cost ratio is common measure of economic efficiency

  13. Economic Benefits • 2000 Survey of Sportfishing in BC (Levey & Williams, 2003) • Provincial average $/AD = 48 • Region 5 average $/AD = 66 (Above average proportion of non-resident angler days in Cariboo region)

  14. Production Costs Production ($) Probable ($) High ($) 2N 3N2N3N2N3N Fry: 0.16 0.184 0.30 0.324 0.46 0.484 FG: 0.12 0.128 0.26 0.264 0.42 0.424 YE: 0.21 0.242 0.35 0.382 0.51 0.542 KO: 0.16 0.184 0.30 0.324 0.46 0.484 CA: 0.73 0.73 0.99 EB: NA 0.206 NA 0.346 NA 0.506

  15. Proposal example: Simon Lake aerator? • Simon Lake: Lodge (No), Access (Yes), Boat restriction (No), BEC (IDFZ), Stocking rate (187/ha), Distance from Kamloops (211km) • Predicted Effort = 10.5 AD/ha • Surface area of Simon Lake = 78.3 ha • Predicted Effort = 10.5 AD/ha * 78.3 ha = 822 ADs • Gross revenue = 822 Ads * $66/AD = $54 252 • Cost of stocking = $4530 • Cost of running an aerator = $5 000 • Net revenue = $54 252 - $4530 - $5 000 = $44 722 • B:C ratio = 54 252/9530 = 5.7:1

More Related