1 / 15

Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Architecture. Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Partnership. Construction Management. Turner construction Company. Structural. KPFF Consulting Engineers. Mechanical & Electrical. Affiliated Engineers Inc. Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. 372,503 ft 2. $90,825,000.

courtney
Télécharger la présentation

Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Architecture Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Partnership Construction Management Turner construction Company Structural KPFF Consulting Engineers Mechanical & Electrical Affiliated Engineers Inc. Robert M. Arnold BuildingFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 372,503 ft2 $90,825,000 Office Space Parking Garage Laboratories Project Team 1100 Fairview Seattle, Washington 2005 Masonry Honor Award LEED Certified Building

  2. Existing Structural System Typical Bay [30’ x 30’] 8 ½” Flat Plate w/ Drop Panels Post-Tensioned Distributed & Banded Tendons Plaza Cast in Place Reinforced Concrete Slab One-Way Slabs w/ Beams Beam Size Varies Gravity System 5th Floor Laboratories 13” Reinforced Concrete Slab Mechanical Level, Roof, & Penthouse Steel Framing W Shape Beams Rectangular HSS Columns

  3. Existing Structural System Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls 20” & 24” thick Special Boundary Elements Braced Frames (Upper Levels) Chevron Braces Lateral System Diagonal Braces X-Braces Seismic Controls Design Base Shear: 5980 kip

  4. Proposed Alternative Structural Design Proposal: Frame Main Portion of Building out of Steel Why?: Reduce Building Mass Improve Constructability Why Not the Entire Building: PLaza & Parking Garage Mechanical, Roof, & Penthouse

  5. New Structural System Typical Sizes W 16 x 26 W 16 x 31 Typical Sizes Typical Sizes W 24 x 55 W W 21 x 50 W Floor Framing Typical Live Load: 75 lb/ft2 Composite Beams • RAM Structural System Composite Girders Steel Columns

  6. New Structural System Columns – maintain location as per original design • Architectural Considerations EXCEPTION: 1 Column addition Minimal Architectural Impact Discontinued @ & below Level 1 Floor Framing

  7. Vibrations: Preliminary Analysis Evaluation for Walking Excitation • 5th Floor – Laboratory Area ap = 0.00408 < 0.005 Lab Equipment is more sensitive to vibration Second analysis recommended

  8. Braced Frames Concentrically Braced Frames Simplifying the Design Process Grouped Structure down to Level 5 Ordinary Braced Frames Special Braced Frames Columns: W14 Shapes X – Bracing: Rect.HSS columns

  9. Construction Management of Alternative Design Complete Building Cost Estimate was not completed- Steel Alternative Cost was Estimated using Integrate Cost Estimating Steel Alternative Cost was Estimated using Integrate Cost Estimating Overall savings $1.8 million

  10. Green Roof Retrofit • Benefits Rainwater Retention & Detention Offsets peak runoff from peak rainfall Lower roof surface temperature during summer helps to reduce the urban heat island effect Types of Green Roofs Extensive Semi-intensive Intensive Background Benefits Rainwater Retention & Detention Lower roof surface temperature during summer Helps to reduce the urban heat island effect

  11. Green Roof: Architectural Design • Potential Areas for Green Roof • Intensive • roof area accessible & viewable by the existing roof terrace • Extensive • upper roof • lower roof • None • stairwells • small area with limited access • mechanical enclosures • skylights • plaza • Green Roof Design Decision • Intensive • NONE • Intensive • All Potential Areas

  12. Green Roof: Architectural Design [Gardendrain GR 30] Roof Construction Sedum Planting Layer 6” Roof Lite Extensive MC Root Barrier Hydrotech Gardendrain GR 30 EPDM [ Water Proofing Membrane] Rigid Insulation

  13. Green Roof: Drainage Design Rainfall: 1 inch/hour Stormwater Runoff Rational Method (Runoff Model) Typical Roof: 0.95 Lawn (Sandy Soil): 0.10 LeaderSizing Based on Projected Area & Percentage of Vertical Surface Areas Does Not consider delayed runoff rate During sustained storm event rate can reach that of typical roof Total Drainage Area: 76,425 ft2 (28) 2 inch Leaders (14) 3 inch Leaders Total Drainage Rate: 19 gpm

  14. Green Roof: Construction Management Cost Analysis [RS Means Renovation & Maintenance] Replacement w/ Ballasted EPDM @ $4.55/ft2 = $253,000 Replacement w/ Green Roof @ $6.47/ft2 = $360,000 Life Cycle [50 year period] Ballasted EPDM: 3 @ $253,000 = $759,000 Extensive Sedum: 1 @ $360,000 = $360,000 Recommendation: Green Roof Installation @ Time of Replacement

  15. Questions ?

More Related