1 / 15

OPAL: outcomes for personal and adaptive learning

OPAL: outcomes for personal and adaptive learning. Rachel Ellaway 1 , Patricia Warren 2 , Catriona Bell 3 , Phillip Evans 2 and Susan Rhind 3 1 MVM Learning Technology Section, 2 Medical Teaching Organisation, 3 Veterinary Teaching Organisation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. OPAL.

creola
Télécharger la présentation

OPAL: outcomes for personal and adaptive learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OPAL: outcomes for personal and adaptive learning Rachel Ellaway1, Patricia Warren2, Catriona Bell3, Phillip Evans2 and Susan Rhind31MVM Learning Technology Section, 2Medical Teaching Organisation, 3Veterinary Teaching Organisation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  2. OPAL • University e-Learning Fund Project 2004-2005 • Opportunity to create staff and student focused curriculum maps for medicine and veterinary medicine • Instantiated inside their respective VLEs • Divergent practices following curriculum needs • Based on learning objectives and outcomes • But really … why do this?

  3. Using the mapStudents Where will I learn about about X ? How will I be assessed about about X ? Where did I learn about about X ? How do I learn about about X ? How will learning about X be relevant to me in practice ? How does X link in with what I will learn later in the course ?

  4. Using the map Teaching Staff Is X being assessed? When are the students taught about X ? How does X relate to other topics? Do I need to include X in my classes, or has it been covered already ? What will students already have learned about X before coming to my class/rotation ?

  5. Using the map Curriculum developers Does the teaching and assessment of X match up? Is X being taught and assessed too much or too little? Where is this particular discipline addressed in the curriculum? How does the teaching of X match professional competencies?

  6. Using the map Quality Assurance Bodies What kinds of physiology topics are being taught? Where is X provided in the curriculum ? How is X provided in the curriculum ? How much assessment is there in the curriculum ? Where (and how) is X assessed in the curriculum ?

  7. Using the map Prospective Students What would they teach me in this particular course ? What would I need to do throughout the course ? How would I be taught and assessed? How is this course different to those at other schools ?

  8. OPAL: process • Iteratively built system • Collecting and coding learning objectives: • Terminal outcomes • Session instance • Year and module instance • Classification - MeSH-based • Keywords: curriculum, teaching and assessment methods • Mapping to Scottish Doctors and Tomorrows Doctors • Many issues encountered …

  9. Coding and Semantics i • Learning objective statements in many forms: • Unitary, compound list, bulleted list, hierarchy, prose • Needed to be unitary - comprehensible as an independent statement • Many needed to be normalised - restructured and revalidated - in new form • Dealing with semantic complexity e.g. synonyms: locomotor, bones and joints, rheumatology etc problematic for syntactic systems (computers) • Medical classification using MeSH: • US system - US language and spelling • Subjective trees and hierarchies • Missing terms - redefined terms - EdMeSH • When to use tree inheritance • How to handle resulting glossary

  10. Coding and Semantics ii • Required vocabularies for: • teaching method (PBL, bedside, self-directed) • assessment mode (OSCE, portfolio, exam) • curriculum structures (semester, rotation, attachment) • Stability of curriculum outcomes (internal for Medics vs external for Vets) • Versioning between academic sessions • Relationship to ever more granular curriculum representations • Ownership and maintenance by teaching staff

  11. Relation to parent systems • All OPAL management, representation and linking are fully integrated with respective programme’s VLEs • Anticipated OPAL becoming the VLE’s underlying semantic and ontological underpinning layers (SOULs) • Follows an object oriented architecture • Connects with all basic system objects: people, events, resources, information etc • Cross-connects with emerging subsystems - PPD, logbooks etc • Cross-mapping opportunities (SDMCG, MEDINE Tuning)

  12. Diverging and converging Practice • OPAL for medicine and veterinary medicine differs: • Outcome framework - internal vs external • Keywording - structured vs unstructured • Granularity of objectives • Intra-system connectivity • And converge: • Versioning, ownership and unitary statements • Multiple classifications • Complexity and extent of process • Limited ability to carry out - central support staff as curriculum cartographers

  13. Unresolved Issues • How to move the process to curriculum mainstream (with appropriate resourcing) • How to get curriculum-wide buy-in and commitment from teaching staff • How to accommodate the multi-dimensional and semantically complex nature of the task more efficiently - without losing functionality • Resolving tensions between process and product • Resolving inherent partialities of curriculum cartographers • How to represent the OPAL map in many different ways to different users for different purposes

  14. Where next? • Complete full curriculum LO maps • Complete system object mapping • Complete student and staff rendering and representation and tools • Finesse and speed up process • Hand over LO ownership to teachers • Link these maps with other maps elsewhere in a sustainable way … … points to educational informatics as a discrete discipline and basis for practice

  15. OPAL: outcomes for personal and adaptive learning Rachel Ellaway1, Patricia Warren2, Catriona Bell3, Phillip Evans2 and Susan Rhind31MVM Learning Technology Section, 2Medical Teaching Organisation, 3Veterinary Teaching Organisation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

More Related