1 / 16

Cross Examination Debate

Cross Examination Debate. Notes – Debate I Rutledge. Characteristics of CX Debate. Policy decisions/options are debated Rounds last 90 minutes (average) 2 debaters on each side Deals with stock issues Topicality Inherency Harms Significance Solvency.

crescent
Télécharger la présentation

Cross Examination Debate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cross Examination Debate Notes – Debate I Rutledge

  2. Characteristics of CX Debate • Policy decisions/options are debated • Rounds last 90 minutes (average) • 2 debaters on each side • Deals with stock issues • Topicality • Inherency • Harms • Significance • Solvency

  3. What are the two sides in a CX round? • Affirmative • Negative

  4. Key Terms • Status Quo: The present system • CX: To ask questions of your opponent • Disadvantage: Anything negative that occurs from enacting the affirmative plan. • Solvency: Proof that the affirmative plan works. • Inherency: Reasons why action cannot be taken now • Topicality: Being on topic • Harms: Bad things that occur in the status quo • Significance: Important or significant • Flow: To take abbreviated notes during a round • Resolution: The statement being debated (begins with “Resolved..)

  5. What does the Affirmative side do? • The affirmative team is responsible for upholding the resolution. • The affirmative team must explain why the present system is bad. • The affirmative team must offer a solution to solving the problems they have pointed out. • The affirmative team must offer proof that what they want to do will work to solve the problems they have pointed out. • The affirmative team must point out why changes cannot occur now in the present system.

  6. About Resolutions • Current Resolution: • Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its engagement toward Cuba, Mexico or Venezuela. • Past Sample Resolutions: • Resolved: That the United States federal government should establish a foreign policy significantly limiting the use of weapons of mass destruction. • Resolved: That the United States federal government should establish an education policy to significantly increase academic achievement in secondary schools in the United States. • Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States.

  7. What does the Negative side do? Your options include: • Defend the status quo (present system) • Speak against change, which is what the resolution asks for. • Explain how the affirmative plan makes things worse. This is known as a disadvantage. • Explain how there is sufficient ability in the present system to do this plan now. • Convince your judge that the affirmative is off topic. This is know as topicality.

  8. Speaking Order • 1AC (First Affirmative Constructive) 8 Minutes • CX 3 Minutes • 1NC (First Negative Constructive) 8 Minutes • CX 3 Minutes • 2AC (Second Affirmative Constructive) 8 Minutes • CX 3 Minutes • 2NC (Second Negative Constructive) 8 Minutes • CX 3 Minutes • 1NR (First Negative Rebuttal) 5 Minutes • 1AR (First Affirmative Rebuttal) 5 Minutes • 2NR (Second Negative Rebuttal) 5 Minutes • 2AR (Second Affirmative Rebuttal) 5 Minutes

  9. Who Cross Examines Who? • 1AC • CX by the 2NC • 1NC • CX by the 1AC • 2AC • CX by 1NC • 2NC • CX by 2AC • 1NR • 1AR • 2NR • 2AR

  10. Why do we Cross Examine? • To expose errors in an opponent’s argument • To clarify information we did not hear or do not understand • To set the foundation for a new argument in the future

  11. Stock Issues • S - Significance • H - Harms • I - Inherency • T - Topicality • S - Solvency • Or “S-H-I-T-S” for short

  12. Significance and Harms • Significance: The state of being important. • Harms: Bad things that occur now in the status quo. • Harms MUST BE Significant as they are the basis that the affirmative argues for change to occur. • Ex: One baby dies every six months due to malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa (Not Significant) • Ex: 1 Million babies die each year due to malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa….(Significant)

  13. I - Inherency • Inherency: The reasons why a problem cannot be solved now (in the present system). • Three Types: • Attitudinal – attitudes which exist • Structural – laws which exist • Existential

  14. T - Topicality • This means that the affirmative case is on topic and abides by all words in the resolution. For instance: • If the resolution calls for the US Federal Government to take action, the party enacting a plan cannot be the European Union. This would not be on topic. • If the resolution is about increasing US student test scores the plan cannot be about lowering teenage pregnancy.

  15. S - Solvency • Solvency is the proof that what you advocate is something that has been (or can be) proven effective. • Must have reputable sources • Should have current dates • Must have cards to prove your case effectiveness • Must solve for all of your harms • Can solve for more but is not necessary • This is called an advantage.

  16. Recap: • CX Debate focuses on the advocacy by one side (the affirmative) for a change in the present system (status quo). The negative team opposes this change and believes the present system (status quo) is better than any proposed change.

More Related