1 / 5

Grant Writing – Approach What if you don’t get anticipated results? Limitations Timeline

Grant Writing – Approach What if you don’t get anticipated results? Limitations Timeline. Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM The NHLBI’s Framingham Heart Study Boston University School of Medicine. No industry relationships to disclose 2R01HL092577 1P50 HL120163 N01-HC 25195.

crescent
Télécharger la présentation

Grant Writing – Approach What if you don’t get anticipated results? Limitations Timeline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grant Writing – ApproachWhat if you don’t get anticipated results?LimitationsTimeline Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM The NHLBI’s Framingham Heart Study Boston University School of Medicine • No industry relationships to disclose • 2R01HL092577 • 1P50 HL120163 • N01-HC 25195

  2. ApproachOrder – Elements • Rationale • Hypothesis • Preliminary results • Methods • Sample • Design • Statistical analysis • Power • Anticipated results • Possible problems and potential solutions • Read grant from paragraph headings

  3. ApproachExpected Outcomes • Outline for each aim • Purpose • Synthesizes each of the aim’s outcomes • Reinforces how aim advances field – ROI • Provides reviewer reassurance that you have back up plan if outcome not met

  4. ApproachPotential Problems Alternative Strategies • Purpose • Demonstrates awareness of limitations • Resilience • Types of problems • Generalizability • Multiple testing • Misclassification • Confounding • Over-adjusting • Changing technology • Temporality • Bias • Causality • Specific assay • Correct model • Enrollment problems

  5. ApproachTimeline • Purpose • Gives reviewers perspective/flow of work • Pitfalls • Illogical sequence • Not grounded in Specific Aims • Over-ambitious • Under-ambitious • Absent timeline

More Related