1 / 94

Advanced Compiler Techniques

Advanced Compiler Techniques. Data Flow Analysis. LIU Xianhua School of EECS, Peking University. REVIEW. Introduc tion to optimization Control Flow Analysis Basic knowledge Basic blocks Control-flow graphs Local Optimizations Peephole optimizations. Outline. Some Basic Ideas

cruz
Télécharger la présentation

Advanced Compiler Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advanced Compiler Techniques Data Flow Analysis LIU Xianhua School of EECS, Peking University

  2. REVIEW • Introduction to optimization • Control Flow Analysis • Basic knowledge • Basic blocks • Control-flow graphs • Local Optimizations • Peephole optimizations “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  3. Outline • Some Basic Ideas • Reaching Definitions • Available Expressions • Live Variables “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  4. Levels of Optimizations • Local • inside a basic block • Global (intraprocedural) • Across basic blocks • Whole procedure analysis • Interprocedural • Across procedures • Whole program analysis “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  5. Dataflow Analysis • Last lecture: • How to analyze and transform within a basic block • This lecture: • How to do it for the entire procedure “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  6. An Obvious Theorem boolean x = true; while (x) { . . . // no change to x } • Doesn’t terminate. • Proof: only assignment to x is at top, so x is always true. x = true if x == true “body” “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  7. Formulation: Reaching Definitions d2 d1 • Each place some variable x is assigned is a definition. • Ask: for this use of x, where could x last have been defined. • In our example: only at x=true. d1: x = true d1 d2 if x == true d1 d2: a = 10 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  8. Clincher • Since at x == true, d1 is the only definition of x that reaches, it must be that x is true at that point. • The conditional is not really a conditional and can be replaced by a jump. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  9. Not Always That Easy int i = 2; intj = 3; while (i != j) { if (i < j) i += 2; else j += 2; } “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  10. Not Always That Easy d1 d2 d3 d4 d2, d3, d4 d1, d3, d4 d1, d2, d3, d4 d1, d2, d3, d4 • Build the Flow Graph d1: i = 2 d2: j = 3 if i != j d1, d2, d3, d4 if i < j d3: i = i+2 d4: j = j+2 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  11. DFA Is Sufficient Only • In this example, i can be defined in two places, and jin two places. • No obvious way to discover that i!=j is always true. • But OK, because reaching definitions is sufficient to catch most opportunities for constant folding (replacement of a variable by its only possible value). “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  12. Be Conservative! • (Code optimization only) • It’s OK to discover a subset of the opportunities to make some code-improving transformation. • It’s notOK to think you have an opportunity that you don’t really have. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  13. Example: Be Conservative Another def of x d2 boolean x = true; while (x) { . . . *p = false; . . . } • Is it possible that ppoints to x? d1: x = true d1 if x == true d2: *p = false “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  14. Possible Resolution • Just as data-flow analysis of “reaching definitions” can tell what definitions of x might reach a point, another DFA can eliminate cases where p definitely does not point to x. • Example: the only definition of pis p = &y and there is no possibility that y is an alias of x. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  15. Data-Flow Analysis Schema • Data-flow value: at every program point • Domain: The set of possible data-flow values for this application • IN[S] and OUT[S]: the data-flow values before and after each statement s • Data-flow problem: find a solution to a set of constraints on the IN [s] ‘s and OUT[s] ‘s, for all statements s. • based on the semantics of the statements ("transfer functions" ) • based on the flow of control. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  16. Data-Flow Equations (1) • A statement/basic block can generate a definition. • A statement/basic block can either • Kill a definition of x if it surely redefines x. • Transmit a definition if it may not redefine the same variable(s) as that definition. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  17. Data-Flow Equations (2) • Variables: • IN[s] = set of data flow values the before a statement s. • OUT[s]= set of data flow values the after a statement s. • Extends: • IN[B] = set of definitions reaching the beginning of block B. • OUT[B] = set of definitions reaching the end of B. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  18. Data-Flow Equations (3) • Two kinds of Constraints: Transfer Functions: OUT[s] = fs(IN[s]) IN[s] = fs(OUT[s]) reversed~ Control Flow Constraints: If B consists of statements s1,s2,…,sn IN[si+1] = OUT[si] “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  19. Between Blocks • Forward analysis(eg: Reaching definitions) • Transfer equations • OUT[B] = fB(IN[B]) Where fB = fsn◦ ••• ◦ fs2 ◦ fs1 • Confluence equations • IN[B] = UP a predecessor of B OUT[P] • Backward analysis(eg: live variables) • Transfer equations • IN[B] = fB (OUT[B]) • Confluence equations • OUT[B] = US a successor of B IN[S]. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  20. Confluence Equations {d1, d2} {d2, d3} • IN(B) = ∪predecessor P of B OUT(P) • OUT(B) = ∪successor S of B IN(S) P1 P2 {d1, d2, d3} B “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  21. Transfer Equations • OUT[B] = fB(IN[B]) • IN[B] = fB(OUT[B]) ~reverse • Generate a definition in the block if its variable is not definitely rewritten later in the basic block. • Kill a definition if its variable is definitely rewritten in the block. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  22. Example: Gen and Kill • An internal definition may be both killed and generated. • For any block B: OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪Gen(B) IN = {d2(x), d3(y), d3(z), d5(y), d6(y), d7(z)} Kill includes {d2(x), d3(y), d5(y), d6(y),…} d1: y = 3 d2: x = y+z d3: *p = 10 d4: y = 5 Gen = {d2(x), d3(x), d3(z),…, d4(y)} OUT = {d2(x), d3(x), d3(z),…, d4(y), d7(z)} “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  23. Iterative Solution to Equations • For an n-block flow graph, there are 2n equations in 2n unknowns. • Alas, the solution is not unique. • Standard theory assumes a field of constants; sets are not a field. • Use iterative solution to get the least fixed-point. • Identifies any def that might reach a point. “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  24. Example: Reaching Definitions IN(B1) = {} OUT(B1) = { IN(B2) = { d1, OUT(B2) = { IN(B3) = { d1, OUT(B3) = { d1: x = 5 B1 d1} d2} if x == 10 B2 d1, d2} d2} d2: x = 15 B3 d2} “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  25. Outline • Some Basic Ideas • Reaching Definitions • Available Expressions • Live Variables “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  26. Reaching Definitions • Concept of definition and use • a = x+y is a definition of a is a use of x and y • A definition reaches a use if value written by definition may be read by use “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  27. Reaching Definitions s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  28. Reaching Def. and Const. Propagation • Is a use of a variable a constant? • Check all reaching definitions • If all assign variable to same constant • Then use is in fact a constant • Can replace variable with constant “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  29. s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s Is a Constant in s = s+a*b? Yes! On all reaching definitions a = 4 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  30. s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n s = s + 4*b; i = i + 1; return s Constant Propagation Transform Yes! On all reaching definitions a = 4 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  31. s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s Is b Constant in s = s+a*b? No! One reaching definition with b = 1 One reaching definition with b = 2 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  32. s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n b = 1; b = 2; i < n i < n s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s return s SplittingPreserves Information Lost At Merges “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  33. s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n s = s + a*b; i = i + 1; return s SplittingPreserves Information Lost At Merges s = 0; a = 4; i = 0; k == 0 b = 1; b = 2; i < n i < n s = s + a*1; i = i + 1; s = s + a*2; i = i + 1; return s return s “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  34. Computing Reaching Definitions • Compute with sets of definitions • represent sets using bit vectors • each definition has a position in bit vector • At each basic block, compute • definitions that reach start of block • definitions that reach end of block • Do computation by simulating execution of program until reach fixed point “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  35. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0000000 1: s = 0; 2: a = 4; 3: i = 0; k == 0 1110000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1110000 1110000 4: b = 1; 5: b = 2; 1111000 1110100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1111100 1111111 i < n 1111100 1111111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1111111 1111100 1111111 1111100 6: s = s + a*b; 7: i = i + 1; return s 1111100 1111111 0101111 “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  36. Formalizing Reaching Definitions • Each basic block has • IN - set of definitions that reach beginning of block • OUT - set of definitions that reach end of block • GEN - set of definitions generated in block • KILL - set of definitions killed in block • GEN[s = s + a*b; i = i + 1;] = 0000011 • KILL[s = s + a*b; i = i + 1;] = 1010000 • Compiler scans each basic block to derive GEN and KILL sets “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  37. Dataflow Equations • IN[b] = OUT[b1] U ... U OUT[bn] • where b1, ..., bn are predecessors of b in CFG • OUT[b] = (IN[b] - KILL[b]) U GEN[b] • IN[entry] = 0000000 • Result: system of equations • KILLB= KILL1 U KILL2 U…U KILLn • GENB=GENn U(GENn-1-KILLn)U (GENn-2-KILLn-1-KILLn) U …U(GEN1-KILL2-KILL3-…-KILLn) “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  38. Solving Equations • Use fixed point algorithm • Initialize with solution of OUT[b] = 0000000 • Repeatedly apply equations • IN[b] = OUT[b1] U ... U OUT[bn] • OUT[b] = (IN[b] - KILL[b]) U GEN[b] • Until reach fixed point • Until equation application has no further effect • Use a worklist to track which equation applications may have a further effect “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  39. Reaching Definitions Algorithm for all nodes n in N OUT[n] = emptyset; // OUT[n] = GEN[n]; IN[Entry] = emptyset; OUT[Entry] = GEN[Entry]; Changed = N - { Entry }; // N = all nodes in graph while (Changed != emptyset) choose a node n in Changed; Changed = Changed - { n }; IN[n] = emptyset; for all nodes p in predecessors(n) IN[n] = IN[n] U OUT[p]; OUT[n] = GEN[n] U (IN[n] - KILL[n]); if (OUT[n] changed) for all nodes s in successors(n) Changed = Changed U { s }; “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  40. Iterative Solution IN(entry) = ∅; for each block B do OUT(B)= ∅; while (changes occur) do for each block B do { IN(B) = ∪predecessors P of B OUT(P); OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪Gen(B); } “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  41. Example “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  42. Outline • Some Basic Ideas • Reaching Definitions • Available Expressions • Live Variables “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  43. Available Expressions • An expression x+y is availableat a point p if • every path from the initial node to p must evaluatex+ybefore reaching p, • and there are no assignments to x or y after the evaluation but before p. • Available Expression information can be used to do global (across basic blocks) CSE • If expression is available at use, no need to reevaluate it “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  44. Example: Available Expression a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  45. Is the Expression Available? YES! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  46. Is the Expression Available? YES! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  47. Is the Expression Available? NO! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  48. Is the Expression Available? NO! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  49. Is the Expression Available? NO! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

  50. Is the Expression Available? YES! a = b + c d = e + f f = a + c b = a + d h = c + f g = a + c j = a + b + c + d “Advanced Compiler Techniques”

More Related