1 / 5

September 20, 2013 | Markets Committee

September 20, 2013 | Markets Committee. Christopher A. Parent . CPARENT@iso-ne.com | 413.540.4599. Response to FERC compliance obligation on cost allocation for the Winter 2013-14 Reliability Program. Winter 2013-14 Reliability Program Cost Allocation.

cullen
Télécharger la présentation

September 20, 2013 | Markets Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. September 20, 2013 | Markets Committee Christopher A. Parent CPARENT@iso-ne.com | 413.540.4599 Response to FERC compliance obligation on cost allocation for the Winter 2013-14 Reliability Program Winter 2013-14 Reliability Program Cost Allocation

  2. FERC Order on the Winter Reliability Program requires modifications to cost allocation “[FERC] find[s] that allocating costs to Real-Time Load Obligation is appropriate in this case, and we will therefore condition our acceptance of the Winter Reliability Program on ISO-NE submitting revised tariff records in a compliance filing that allocate costs to Real-Time Load Obligation. Long-standing cost-causation and benefits/burdens principles provide that costs should be allocated to those who benefit from the incurrence of the costs. As discussed below, ISO-NE proposed the Winter Reliability Program to address generation-related reliability concerns, not transmission-related concerns, through an interim program designed to ensure sufficient energy supply to meet real-time load during the coming winter. Because real-time load is the primary beneficiary, and the primary cost-driver, of the Winter Reliability Program, we find that costs of the Program should be allocated to Real-Time Load Obligation.”

  3. Cost allocation will change from Regional Network Load to Real-Time Load Obligation • All costs will be allocated to the sum of Participant’s pro-rata share of the Real-Time Load Obligation (RTLO) minus any RTLO associated to the Dispatchable Asset Related Demand (DARD) pumps • Consistent with RTLO cost allocation for a number of other services, load from DARD pumps is being excluded

  4. Proposed changes to cost allocation require settlement and billing timing changes • Original proposal allocated all Appendix K related costs to monthly Regional Network Load • Regional Network Load are provided to the ISO after each month requiring payments charged to Regional Network Load to be billed on a one month lag (e.g., January would be billed in March) • FERC order requires Appendix K related costs (and refunds through penalties) be allocated to Real-Time Load Obligation • Hourly meter data that is used to calculation Real-Time Load Obligation is received on a two business day lag • Using Real-Time Load Obligation for cost allocation allows for more accelerated settlement and billing of Appendix K provisions • All items will be billed in the month following the obligation month, rather than on a one month lag (e.g., January will be billed in February, rather than in March)

  5. * Non-Hourly Service Bill** Hourly Services Bill Cost Allocation Charge and Billing Intervals • The allocation of any “credits” associated with non-performance will use the same charge interval and billing interval as the associated payment

More Related