SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY

cutter avatar
46 diapositives · 645 Views · Oct 22, 2014

THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY. GENE PESTI 1 & JOHN DRIVER 2 1 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA 2 JACKSON LABORATORY USA. THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY. PROTEIN & ENERGY ON CARCASS LEAN & FAT INEXPENSIVE DIETS -> FAT CARCASSES DIETARY CU LEVELS CHOLESTEROL LEVELS IN MEAT

THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY - slide 1
01 / 46THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY GENE PESTI1 & JOHN DRIVER2 1UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA 2JACKSON LABORATORY USA

  2. THE IMPACT OF NUTRITON ON CARCASS QUALITY • PROTEIN & ENERGY ON CARCASS LEAN & FAT • INEXPENSIVE DIETS -> FAT CARCASSES • DIETARY CU LEVELS • CHOLESTEROL LEVELS IN MEAT • CALCIUM & PHOSPHORUS • MARGINAL LEVELS -> BROKEN BONES & BRUISES

  3. From Donaldson et al., 1956

  4. From Donaldson et al., 1956

  5. From Donaldson et al., 1956 • Growth Not Related to C/P Ratio • No “Optimums” Evident

  6. From Donaldson et al., 1956 • Carcass Composition fits C/P Ratio Well • No “Optimums” Evident

  7. From Donaldson et al., 1956 • Carcass Composition Related to C/P Ratio • Carcass Composition Related to C & P Levels

  8. Pesti, G.M., T.S. Whiting & L.S. Jensen, Poultry Science 62:490 (1983) • Altering the form of the diet alters the carcass composition response to dietary energy

  9. Data of M.-L. Grisoni (INRA, 1991)

  10. Data of M.-L. Grisoni (INRA, 1991)

  11. Data of M.-L. Grisoni (INRA, 1991)

  12. Data of M.-L. Grisoni (INRA, 1991)

  13. 24% Protein 16% Protein

  14. 24% Protein 16% Protein

  15. HMG-CoA reductase • REGULATES CHOLESTEROL SYNTHESIS • REGULATES FATTY ACID SYNTHESIS • IS COPPER SENSITIVE

  16. COPPER STATUS CHOLESTEROL SYNTHESIS

  17. COPPER STATUS CHOLESTEROL SYNTHESIS ?

  18. Johnson, M.A., 1986. J. Nutrition 116:802

  19. OTHER KNOWN EFFECTS OF DIETARY COPPER • COPPER ACCUMULATES IN BONES • SOFT PORK IN SWINE

  20. DIETARY CALCIUM & PHOSPHORUS AND CARCASS QUALITY • P IS EXPENSIVE • POTENTIAL POLLUTANT • NUTRITIONISTS MINIMIZE USE • Ca IS INEXPENSIVE • DECREASES FAT ABSORPTION • NUTRITIONISTS MINIMIZE USE

  21. Introduction • A suitable combination of 1αOH-D3 (1A) and phytase in the diet could reduce requirements for both inorganic Ca and P sources • Implications: • Reduced P in excreta • Improved feed efficiency • Lower requirements of nutrients which interact with Ca and P

  22. Objectives To determine: • The feasibility of replacing a portion of dietary Ca and P with a combination of phytase and 1A under commercial grow-out conditions • Which phase of production is more responsive to the combination of supplements (Starter or Grower/Finisher)

  23. Objectives To determine: • The feasibility of replacing a portion of dietary Ca and P with a combination of phytase and 1A under commercial grow-out conditions • Which phase of production is more responsive to the combination of supplements (Starter or Grower/Finisher) • The implications of Ca and P replacement in terms of carcass processing

  24. Materials and Methods • Ca & P deficient (mash) diets were mixed: • Starter phase • Grower/Finisher phase • Diets were mixed with and without: • 1000 FTU/kg Natuphos Phytase (P) • 5mg/kg 1a-OH-cholecalciferol (1A) P+ 1A • 5 Feeding Regimens were used

  25. Feeding Regimens

  26. Feeding Regimens PENS = 4 PENS = 4 PENS = 4 PENS = 4 PENS = 8

  27. Parameters Measured • BWG, FI & FCR from 0 to 18 and 19 to 35 days • 10 birds were selected on days 18 and 35 and: • Left tibias were collected for % Tibia Ash determination • Right tibias were sliced and scored for incidence and severity of P & Ca rickets & TD

  28. Parameters Measured • Tibias snapped during evisceration • Broken clavicles • Bloody breast muscles • Broken femurs

  29. ResultsBody Weight Gain (0 to 35 d) A A A a a b B B bc c a a a b b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  30. ResultsFCR (feed to gain ratio) a b b b c A AB AB AB B a b b a b b b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  31. Results% Tibia Ash at 18 & 35 d a a a a b c cd d b b a a a b b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  32. Results% Phosphorus Rickets at 18 & 35 d a b c c c 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  33. Results% Broken Tibias After Evisceration a ab ab b b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  34. Results% Broken Clavicles After De-boning a a a ab b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  35. Results% Bloody Pectoralis Minor After De-boning a a ab ab b 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  36. Results% Broken Femurs After De-boning 0 to 18 d → 19 to 35 d →

  37. Conclusion • The P+1A combination was required only during the Starter Phase to optimize BWG and FCR and eliminate bone disease • Feeding P+1A at the very low levels of dietary Ca and P used was not sufficient to obtain maximum bone ash or prevent allbones from breaking during processing

  38. Implications • The combination of 1A and Phytase is a very promising alternative to inorganic Ca and P sources. • The value of both supplements depends upon their price and availability as well as dietary levels of Ca and P and Phytin P • Future testing should be conducted to determine how much dietary Ca and P can be replaced by the combination of these two supplements

  39. SUMMARY • CARCASS LEAN MEAT YIELD IS RELATD TO • CARCASS LIPID LEVELS • PROTEIN LEVEL • ENERGY LEVEL • FEED FORM • IF ENERGY BECOMES SCARCE & PROTEIN ABUNDANT, THE PROBLEM OF FAT CARCASSES MAY TAKE CARE OF ITSELF

  40. SUMMARY • CARCASS LIPID PROFILES CAN BE EASILY INFLUENCED: • DIETARY FATTY ACIDS • FEEDING PHARMACOLOGICAL LEVELS OF CU • DIETARY MINERALS ARE BECOMING VERY EXPENSIVE • REMEMBER TO EVALUATE CARCASSES WHENEVER EVALUATING MINERAL LEVELS