1 / 28

Magnetic structures created by localised velocity shear and magnetic buoyancy

Magnetic structures created by localised velocity shear and magnetic buoyancy. Nic Brummell Kelly Cline Fausto Cattaneo Nic Brummell (303) 492-8962 JILA, University of Colorado brummell@solarz.colorado.edu. Large-scale dynamo: Intuitive picture. toroidal -> poloidal.

Télécharger la présentation

Magnetic structures created by localised velocity shear and magnetic buoyancy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Magnetic structures created by localised velocity shear and magnetic buoyancy Nic Brummell Kelly Cline Fausto Cattaneo Nic Brummell (303) 492-8962 JILA, University of Colorado brummell@solarz.colorado.edu

  2. Large-scale dynamo: Intuitive picture toroidal -> poloidal toroidal <- poloidal Philosophy: Examine nonlinear versions of concepts with as few assumptions as possible Here, we will examine the W-effect and the role of magnetic buoyancy

  3. The role of magnetic buoyancy Dual roles of magnetic buoyancy in the large-scale dynamo: Limiter: • Magnetic buoyancy limits the growth of the magnetic field by removing flux from the region of dynamo amplification • Magnetic buoyancy instabilities then control the dynamo amplitude • BUT magnetic buoyancy does not actively contribute to the amplification process Driver: • If the poloidal field regeneration is associated with rising and twisting structures, then magnetic buoyancy is the very mechanism that drives the dynamo. First case – dynamo operates IN SPITE of magnetic buoyancy Second case – dynamo operates BECAUSEof magnetic buoyancy Examine via solutions of fully nonlinear MHD equations

  4. By + Model: Localised velocity shear Mimic some properties of the tachocline : • Use a convectively stable layer • Force* a velocity shear in both the vertical (z) and one horizontal (y) direction. e.g. U(y,z) = f(z) cos(2 p y/ym) where f(z) is a polynomial function chosen to confine the shear to a particular layer between zu and zl (and to be sufficiently continuous) • Shear flow is hydrodynamically stable Then add an initial magnetic field: B0 = (0, By , 0) withBy = 1 * Add term in the equations that induces desired flow in absence of magnetic effects

  5. Basic “W–effect’’ mechanism • Start from zero velocity initial conditions (technical reasons: avoids long transients) • As velocity builds up in shear regions, it stretches the transverse (poloidal) field out into streamwise (toroidal) field. • Fieldlines become close together where the velocity shear in y is strongest (y=p/2, 3p/2) creating structure in the magnetic field. • Mathematically, strong Bx is created from weak By by the inductance of the shear: dt Bx ~ BydyU0

  6. Induction of strong toroidal field by shear

  7. Evolution What happens next depends upon the parameters!

  8. Low Rm: Non-static equilibrium A very boring movie!

  9. Low Rm: Non-static equilibrium A balance between stretching production and diffusive removal of Bx is achieved. However, advection plays a role: buoyancy-driven roll cells make the equilibrium non-static. Magnetic field is dynamically active

  10. Increasing Rm: Magnetic buoyancy instability A more interesting movie! • Instability • Cyclic activity • Two out-of-phase sequences of identical but oppositely-directed magnetic structures • Instability driven by interaction of induced poloidal flow with background shear

  11. Higher Rm: Chaotic behaviour For higher Rm, structures are formed and rise but in a chaotic manner: • Size, strength and geometry vary • Cyclic but irregular position of eruption and therefore polarities of rising structures

  12. Larger Re: Secondary K-H instability Instability mechanism: • Initial field purely poloidal • Poloidal field sheared -> toroidal • Toroidal field creates magnetic buoyancy • Magnetic buoyancy induces roll-like poloidal flows • These steepen the shear • If shear is steepened enough, becomes K-H unstable Rotation of a snapshot

  13. Dynamo Hmmm… A possible dynamo mechanism?

  14. Other configurations used too: Velocity shear: Early work:U(y,z) = f(z) cos(2 p y/ym) Dynamo work: U(y,z) = f(z) [sawtooth(y)] Magnetic field: B0=(0,By,0) Early work: By = 1 Dynamo work: +1 (z>0.5) - 1 (z<0.5) By - { By = By + Model: Localised velocity shear 2 Sawtooth profile

  15. Weak initial field: Non-static quasi-equilibrium System eventually decays due to diffusion between the By = +/- parts (hence quasi-equilibrium)

  16. Stronger initial field: A dynamo!

  17. A dynamo! Strong magnetic field maintained! Strong toroidal field is generated in a cyclic manner Polarity of the strong field reverses Bx - ve Bx + ve cf. By(t=0)=1!

  18. A dynamo! Longer time … Diffusion time ~ 300 time units => even more convincing is a dynamo Remarkably, also shows periods of reduced activity!

  19. Dynamo conclusions • A new class of dynamo mechanisms (as far as we know) • A dynamo driven solely by the action of shear and magnetic buoyancy • Fully self-consistent • No Coriolis forces required to twist toroidal into poloidal • Intrinsically nonlinear … cannot quantify in terms of an “a-effect” (and if you do attempt to, get meaningless result).

  20. What is a flux tube? Examine magnetic fieldlines These structures appear to fit with our natural ideas of a magnetic flux tube: • compact, cylindrical, isolated • clear inside/out To be true, need magnetic flux surfaces. Do they really exist? We will examine the nature of magnetic fieldlines in the three general states found: • equilibrium • primary instability • secondary instability We take a 3-D snapshot of the magnetic fields, pick a starting point and integrate along the magnetic field lines.

  21. Fieldlines in equilibrium state: x-invariant, y-mirror symmetric Recurrence maps of 15 fieldlines stacked vertically in XY- and YZ-planes. Invariant sets are isolated points – hits same points over and over again. Fieldlines map out only a line (degenerate surfaces) Projection of 15 fieldlines stacked vertically onto YZ-plane (i.e. viewed from the end) Projection of 1 fieldline onto XY-plane (i.e. viewed from above)

  22. Fieldlines – primary instability: Break y-mirror symmetry Recurrence maps of 15 fieldlines stacked vertically in XY- and YZ-planes. Points of return migrate due to loss of symmetry. Invariant set is a line. Fieldlines map out a PLANE, i.e. FLUX SURFACES. Projection of 15 fieldlines stacked vertically onto YZ-plane (i.e. viewed from the end) Projection of 1 fieldline onto XY-plane (i.e. viewed from above)

  23. Fieldlines – primary instability: Time sequence: Recurrence maps of 15 fieldlines (stacked vertically) in YZ-planes. Surfaces remain as surfaces throughout. Contours in YZ-plane

  24. Fieldlines – secondary instability: Break x-translational symmetry too Recurrence maps of 15 fieldlines (stacked vertically) in YZ-planes. Fieldlines fill volume during the 3D stages. Invariant set is some complicated object! Time sequence:

  25. Fieldlines – secondary instability: Recurrence map (YZ-plane) • single instance in time • 3D KH kinked structure • 5 returns • initial positions inside “structure” Fieldlines do NOT remain within structure. Neighbouring fieldlines diverge rapidly (chaotic?)

  26. Fieldlines – secondary instability: “Lyapunov” map (YZ-plane) • single instance in time • 3D KH kinked structure • Points within 3D structure show large “Lyapunov” exponents • Trajectories diverge rapidly • Chaotic!

  27. Comments, thoughts, conclusions(?) Three types of fieldline topology found: • Very symmetric: Fieldlines lie on surfaces but individual lines do not cover the surface • No y mirror symmetry: Fieldlines lie on surfaces and individual lines do cover the surface • No x translational symmetry: Fieldlines occupy some complex topological object! • Flux surfaces only exist where there is a great deal of symmetry • Structures are not necessarily encased in flux surfaces • There is no easily defined inside/outside (therefore cannot define writhe, twist etc uniquely) • Fluid is free to flow in and out (leak out) of the structure Despite the fact that this is not our idealised picture, this may actually HELP in many problematic circumstances, e.g. axisymmetric rise of a flux tube. Questions: • Fieldlines ever lie CLOSE to flux surfaces? • Can reconnection isolate entities? (only if remains symmetric?) • Or do we re-think magnetic structures?

More Related