1 / 37

Social behavior

Social behavior. ANS 305. My lecture. Will discuss some basic information on aspects of social behavior Will present some results from our work looking at the impact of feeder design on some aspects of social behavior. Origins of Social Behavior (Broom, 1981).

cyrah
Télécharger la présentation

Social behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social behavior ANS 305

  2. My lecture • Will discuss some basic information on aspects of social behavior • Will present some results from our work looking at the impact of feeder design on some aspects of social behavior

  3. Origins of Social Behavior(Broom, 1981) • Approach and join groups because they have probably found food • Predator approaches, get in the middle of the group • Stay in group because early warning by others can be used • Food depleted, one individual leaves, follow it for it may know where to find more food • Parental care increases survival chances of offspring

  4. Individual recognition • Social stability • Parent and offspring interactions • Avoid inbreeding • Mate choice • Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) • Maximizing diversity in immunological responsiveness

  5. Olfactory communication • Pheromones • Flehmen • Urine marking • territory • own body • Anal gland secretion • Sebaceous skin glands • Saliva

  6. Stable Social Structures • Communication • Vocalization • Visual display • Physical contact • Chemical communication

  7. Stable Social Structures • Reduced aggression • Display • Threat behavior • Submissive behavior

  8. Social organization • Dogs may occupy and defend a territory. Males, females and juvenile have distinct social order Lorenz, 1953

  9. Social organization

  10. Social organization • Cats spend most of time “alone”. Females may defend a territory. Leyhausen, 1982

  11. Stable Social Structures • Social recognition • Optimal group size • Sub groups may be formed • Memory of social encounters • Visual • Olfactory • Combination

  12. Some terms used to describe “social behavior” • Social facilitation • Social order • Size • Presence of weapons • Territoriality • Temperament • Alliances • Sex • e.g. teat order in piglets

  13. Social Organization (Fraser & Broom, 1990) • Physical Structure of the territory (=enclosure) • Social Structure • Group Cohesion (kinship; alliances)

  14. Social organization • Social strategies 1 1 2 2 3 4 3 4 5 5 6

  15. Social organization • Social strategies 1 HS 2 3 1 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 LS 7 to 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 NS

  16. Social organization • Sows were divided into three groups: • HS= High success in agonistic interactions • LS= Low success in agonistic interactions • NS= Now success in agonistic interactions

  17. Social organization • In natural settings, female pigs live in groups of 4-6 (related animals) and their offspring. Males may form a temporary bond with the “family unit” (Mauget, 1985; Wood-Gush and Stolba). • Olfactory and visual signaling are important in maintaining social stability

  18. Challenges • The majority of pregnant sows are kept in gestating crates • High levels of unresolved aggressive interactions may occur (Broom, Mendl & Zanella, 1996) • The concentration of environmental contaminants (e.g. ammonia) may interfere with olfactory memory (Mendl personal communication)

  19. Challenges.. • Maternal deprivation stress, at an early age, may alter social memory (Yuan et al. 1999)

  20. Social organization • Stallions related to a group of mares in a very stable way (harem). Non-breeding males may form bachelor groups. • Testosterone levels are, oftentimes, below the level of detection in stallions living in a “bachelor” group. Acceptance into a group of mares is related to an instantaneous rise in testosterone and changes in behavior (McDonnell, 1997). • Stallions are not territorial.

  21. Challenges • In some commercial farms horses are housed in individual stalls, with restrict social contact • Housing stallions in close proximity may cause a decrease in reproductive performance

  22. Social Organization • Male donkeys may defend a territory and try to attract females • Vocalizations (primarily) • Male donkeys are territorial

  23. Social Organization • Female grouping is observed in sheep, goats & cattle. During non-breeding season males may form “bachelor” groups. Social grooming is an important feature of cattle social behavior

  24. Social organization • Hens and cocks have separate “peck orders”. They are territorial. • Social unit: dominant cock, 4 to 6 hens, pullets and several subordinate males

  25. Large Round Bale Feeder Design Affects the Occurrence of Aggressive Interactions in Beef Cows L.M. Korzun, D. D. Buskirk, T. M. Harrigan, D. R. Hawkins, and A. J. Zanella Michigan State University

  26. The Problem • Feed is the greatest expense for wintering beef cattle in Michigan • estimated $377.99/cow with $100/cow forage costs (MSU-IRM-SPA 1998) • Majority of hay is fed in large round bales (Michigan Beef Cow Calf Survey- MSU AES 1991) • Observations suggest a difference in hay wastage between different feeder designs

  27. Hypothesis • Round bale feeder design affects social and feeding behavior of cattle.

  28. Objective • To examine the impact of round bale feeder design on the behavior of cattle

  29. Methods • 80 non-lactating beef cows separated by weight and weight range into 4- 19.5m x 18m pens • Each pen contained one of 4 feeders placed under video surveillance cameras • feeders were rotated after day 7 • Ad libitum hay offered, refused hay from each feeder collected and weighed daily

  30. Cone Ring Trailer Cradle Methods- Feeder Types

  31. Methods- Behavioral Sampling • Data collected in 5 minute samples • 8am-5pm, 30 minute intervals • Check sheet: • continuous observation for frequencies • instantaneous sampling for cattle numbers • 190 segments total were decoded for behaviors • frequency of aggressive interactions • transitions in/out of feeder • data analyzed using the SAS program

  32. Definitions • Aggression - animal threatens or attempts to remove another animal from the feeder or vicinity • In feeder - animal places head in designated slat of feeder • Out of feeder - animal removes head from designated slat in feeder

  33. Results

  34. Results a ab Different Superscripts have P< 0.05 b c c

  35. Results

  36. Conclusions • Round bale feeder design has an impact on cattle behavior. • Cows feeding from Trailer and Cradle feeders showed a greater number of aggressive interactions than cows fed at round feeders. • Cows feeding from Trailer and Cradle feeders had a higher frequency of transitions in/out of feeder than cows fed at round feeders.

  37. Discussion • Why is difference in behavior related to feeder design? • Animal vulnerability • Body contact and opportunity to escape • Feeding height • Can we use behavior to design a better feeder? • More research to come...

More Related