1 / 5

Ch. 6) PARTICULAR LAWYER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Ch. 6) PARTICULAR LAWYER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. ADVOCATE Problem pp. 412-3: Frivolous Claims ( a,b ) Does either plaintiff or defendant have a duty to investigate before filing petition or answer? (1) under disciplinary law (MRPC 3.1)? (2) under procedural law (FRCP 11)?

dacia
Télécharger la présentation

Ch. 6) PARTICULAR LAWYER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ch. 6) PARTICULAR LAWYER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES • ADVOCATE Problem pp. 412-3: Frivolous Claims (a,b) Does either plaintiff or defendant have a duty to investigate before filing petition or answer? (1) under disciplinary law (MRPC 3.1)? (2) under procedural law (FRCP 11)? Giangrasso, p. 414 (3) is a defendant’s denial different from a plaintiff’s allegation? What about a criminal defendant’s plea of not guilty? (4) was Lincoln’s investigation adequate under these standards? What should he have done?

  2. Problem pp. 412-4 c’t’d • What remedies are available to the party against whom a frivolous claim is filed? (1) within the proceeding (Giangrasso) (A) costs of defending? (B) attorneys’ fees? (C) non-monetary relief (injunction against further suit?) (2) separate civil action for damages – what elements? Prewitt v. Sexton, p. 422

  3. Further issues re frivolous claims • Is there a continuing duty to update papers and positions as further evidence comes in? FRCP 11(b) • Does the court have discretion not to order sanctions, once a violation of Rule 11 has been found? FRCP 11(c) (cf. previous version!) • what about “threatening criminal prosecution”? What is at issue?

  4. Pretrial delay and discovery abuse: Problem pp. 426-8 • Does Fisons or its lawyers have a duty to disclose the “smoking gun” documents, absent a discovery request? FRCP 26(a)! (b) (i) Was the Fisons’ law firm’s response to Ps’ request appropriate? N. 1 pp. 428-9 (A) was the objection valid? (B) was the production consistent with the offer? (ii) if a discovery request is made, can the lawyer for the requested party simply rely on their client to find responsive material? FRCP 26(g), and nn. 2, 3 pp. 429-30 (A) “reasonable inquiry”? (B) “reasonable effort to assure that client has provided all the information available to it responsive to demand”?

  5. Problem pp. 426-8 c’t’d (b, c) who should be sanctioned if a particular response is insufficient? (A) the signer (FRPC 26(g)(3)) (B) the party? Id. (C) in-house counsel who doesn’t sign? • Can the client turn over the “smoking gun” to firm, but forbid disclosing it? How should firm respond? • what are court’s powers re excessive requests? FRCP 26(b)(2), 26(c) • after Rayle’s conduct at deposition, what happens next?

More Related