170 likes | 307 Vues
INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING ENHANCED BY VIRTUAL REALITY IDENTITY. Project work-plan and expected results Prof. dr. ing. Gheorghe SCUTARU. Project work-plan and expected results. PREPARATORY STAGE Overall duration: 6 months
E N D
INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING ENHANCED BY VIRTUAL REALITYIDENTITY Project work-plan and expected results Prof. dr. ing. Gheorghe SCUTARU December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results • PREPARATORY STAGE Overall duration: 6 months The start date: 1st October 2006 ; The finish date: 1st April 2007 ; • PROGRESS STAGE Overall duration: 11 months The start date: 1st April 2007 ; The finish date: 1st March 2008 ; • IMPLEMENTATION STAGE Overall duration: 7 months The start date: 1st March 2008 ; The finish date: 1st October 2008 ; December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PREPARATORY STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PREPARATORY STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PREPARATORY STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PREPARATORY STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PROGRESS STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PROGRESS STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PROGRESS STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results PROGRESS STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results IMPLEMENTATION STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results IMPLEMENTATION STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results IMPLEMENTATION STAGE December, 18, 2006
Project work-plan and expected results IMPLEMENTATION STAGE December, 18, 2006
EXPERTS’ RECOMMANDATIONS: EXPERT 1 • Assure from the beginning an IPR policy for the inclusions of tools within the Learning Resource centre • Examples of real learning scenarios in real settings are needed. The output “Educational Report” should include the condition for the use and the limitations for the good use of the system in any organization willing to do it. • The strategy for the quality selection of the tools within the VR-LRC is not mentioned • Dissemination should be improved by making links with international associations in the field of engineering education • The implementation phase needs more time. Two months (!!) is very little for the validity of the results, examples of good practices, etc. December, 18, 2006
EXPERTS’ RECOMMANDATIONS: EXPERT 2 • The project exploitation needs a thorough plan and strategy that goes beyond the current project consortium. The use of the results inside and outside the partnership must be explained, and transferability scenarios should be included. • IPRs issues (in particular for VR elements) must be cleared. • The work plan needs more details as far as the technical implementation and infrastructure is concerned. Test phases should be described in a clear way, giving quantitative and qualitative indicators. • The evaluation strategy for external evaluation should be given in order to allow for measurable success factors, and should clearly start before the end of the project December, 18, 2006
THANK YOU ! December, 18, 2006