1 / 11

ACARE Member States Group

ACARE Member States Group. View and national examples 26th of June 2014 - General Assembly. Member States. The Member States are committed to achieve Flightpath 2050 and have embarked on the SRIA Several national initiatives are aligned with the SRIA The Member States are actively involved

dahlia
Télécharger la présentation

ACARE Member States Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACARE Member States Group View and national examples 26th of June 2014 - General Assembly

  2. Member States • The Member States are committed to achieve Flightpath 2050 and have embarked on the SRIA • Several national initiatives are aligned with the SRIA • The Member States are actively involved • a specific Member States group • ACARE is the only ETP having such direct involvement • Efforts are undertaken to achieve a global level playing field for Aviation • ?? Line on EASA, Eurocontrol??

  3. Examples of national inivatives: Sweden NRIA = National Strategy National view on Innovation System for Aerospace http://www.nriaflyg.se/

  4. CORACCouncil for Civil Aeronautics Research France CORAC Council • A national mirror platform to the ACARE technology platform • Council created in 2008 • Under the chairmanship of the Minister for Transports • Gathers all stakeholders in Civil Aeronautics and Air Transport • Airlines, airports, air navigation service providers, Aircraft manufacturers, engine, systems and equipment suppliers, institutions & professional associations, research establishment ONERA, all Ministries concerned by Aviation research (Research, Defence, Industry and Finance, Ecology and Transport) • French strategy in terms of aviation research • Very much aligned with the ACARE Strategic Research • CORAC research roadmaps consistent and complementary • Pursue ACARE ambitious objective by 2020 (and 2050) • To reduce the perceived noise by a factor 2 by 2020 • To reduce aircraft carbon dioxide emissions by half • To reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 80%

  5. Total Take Off funding: ~ 62 million € Austria: Take Off funding – according to segments Ranked 15! MitarbeiterInnen 142 projects in total

  6. Spain: CDTI support to aeronautics R&D AERONAUTICS thematicareas Vs nationalfundedprojects ≈ EUR 500 milliondirectfundingbetween 2006-2012

  7. Real frost FINLAND: Reduction of the environmental impact of aircraft de-icing fluids Icewing programme 2011-2015 Generic Airbus type 3 element airfoil withwing tank cooling Wind tunnel testing of fluid effects Wind tunnel testing of real frost effects Budget 420000€ erkki.soinne@trafi.fi

  8. First Induction welded control surfaces G650 A380 outboard fixed leading edge First large scale assembly: Welded fixed wing leading edges A340 First welded assembly: MUC door Fo50 First primary structure: Gulfstr pressure floors First series production: Fairchild Dornier ribs The Netherlands: Road Map for Thermoplastic Components ‘TAPAS2’ • SRIA Relevance • Lower Weight up to -20% • Labour Cost up to -40% TAPAS SRP’s CVO • High Automation Possible CVO TAPAS2 VTP CVO Budget 23 M€40% gov. loan VTP 1990 2017 2010 2013 2000

  9. Fundingschemes in Member States

  10. Conclusion • Several funding opportunities for aviation research exist in member states, however national research funds suffer from the financial crises • In addition funding for aviation under Horizon 2020 is mainly focused on large closer to the market initiatives such as Clean Sky and SESAR • National funds can not compensate for the gap that exists for lower TRL level research • As a result of this gap, the European leadership is in jeopardy and may have the consequence of Europe not achieving the ACARE SRIA high level objectives • Regional and structural funds are an area still underexplored

  11. Recommendations • National/regional/structural funding programmes follow a different technical and political agenda and have different governance structures • This represents a challenge for both the European Commission, Clean Sky, SESAR and the Member States • Alignment and synergies between different funds may be strengthened with the help of private (regional) stakeholders • The Member States recommend to investigate potential synergies between Horizon 2020, EU Structural funds and/or national and regional funds.

More Related