1 / 42

Chapter 11 Growth and Technological Progress: The Solow-Swan Model

The World Bank. Chapter 11 Growth and Technological Progress: The Solow-Swan Model. © Pierre-Richard Agénor. Basic Structure and Assumptions The Dynamics of Capital and Output A Digression on Low-Income Traps Population, Savings, and Steady-State Output The Speed of Adjustment

dahlia
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 11 Growth and Technological Progress: The Solow-Swan Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The World Bank Chapter 11Growth and Technological Progress: The Solow-Swan Model © Pierre-Richard Agénor

  2. Basic Structure and Assumptions • The Dynamics of Capital and Output • A Digression on Low-Income Traps • Population, Savings, and Steady-State Output • The Speed of Adjustment • Model Predictions and Empirical Facts

  3. Basic Structure and Assumptions

  4. Solow-Swan model assumptions: • closed economy, producing one good using both labor and capital; • technological progress is given and the saving rate is exogenously determined; • no government and fixed number of firms in the economy, each with the same production technology; • output price is constant and factor prices (including wages) adjust to ensure full utilization of all available inputs.

  5. Four variables considered: flow of output, Y; stock of capital, K; number of workers, L; knowledge or the effectiveness of labor, A. Aggregate production function given by, Y = F(K,AL). A and L enter multiplicatively, where AL is effective labor, and technological progress enters as labor augmenting or Harrod neutral.

  6. Assumed characteristics of the model: Marginal product of each factor is positive (Fh > 0, where h = K, AL) and there are diminishing returns to each input (Fhh < 0). Constant returns to scale (CRS) in capital and effective labor: F(mK,mAL) = mF(K,AL). m 0(1) Inputs other than capital, labor, and knowledge are unimportant. Model neglects land and other natural resources.

  7. Intensive-form production function: Output per unit of effective labor, y, and capital per unit of effective labor, k, are related by setting m = 1/AL in (1), F(K/AL, 1) = 1/AL [F(K, AL)](2) Let k = K/AL, y = Y/AL, and f(k) = F(k,1). Equation (2) is then written as y = f(k), f(0) = 0(3)

  8. Intensive-form production function: In (3), f '(k) is the marginal product of capital, FK, marginal product of capital is positive. marginal product of capital decreases as capital (per unit of effective labor) rises, f "(k) < 0. • Intensive-form satisfies Inada conditions: lim f  (k) = , lim f (k) = 0 k0 k

  9. Cobb-Douglas Function: A production function that satisfies Solow-Swan model characteristics: Y = F(K, AL) = K(AL)1- , 0 <  < 1, (4) Intensive form Cobb-Douglas: Dividing both sides of (4) by AL yields, y = f(k) = (K/AL) = k , (5) and, f '(k) = k - 1 > 0, f "(k) = - (1 - )k - 2 < 0.

  10. Labor and Knowledge Labor and knowledge determined exogenously with constant growth rates,  and : L/L = , A/A = ; (7) . . Savings and Consumption • Output divided between consumption, C, and investment, I: Y = C + I (9)

  11. Savings, S, defined as Y - C, a constant fraction, s, of output: S  Y - C= sY, 0 < s < 1 (10) • Savings equals investment such that: S = I = sY (11)

  12. with  denoting the rate of capital stock depreciation Consumption per unit of labor, c, is determined by: c= (1 - s)k , i = sk(13) with, c = C/AL and i = I/AL See Figure 11.1 for graphical distribution of output allocated among consumption, saving, and investment. Savings and Consumption • Capital stock, K, changes through time by: K = sY - K (12), .

  13. The Dynamics of Capital and Output

  14. k = K/AL - (K/AL)L/L - (K/AL)A/A = K/AL - (L/L + A/A)k (14) . . . . . . . Economic growth determined by the behavior of the capital stock. • Differentiating the expression k = K/AL with respect to time yields, • Substituting (4), (8), and (12) into (14) results in k = sk - ( +  + )k,  +  +  >0, (15) a non-linear, first-order differential equation. .

  15. Equation 15: the key to the Solow-Swan model; the rate of change of the capital stock per units of effective labor as the difference between two terms: • sk: actual investment per unit of effective labor. Output per units of effective labor is k, and the fraction of that output that is invested is s. • ( +  + )k: required investmentor the amount of investment that must be undertaken in order to keep k at its existing level. • Figure 11.2.

  16. Reasons why investment is needed to prevent k from falling (see (15)), • capital stock is depreciating by k; • effective labor is growing by (n +)k; • therefore if sk is greater (lower) than (n +  + )k, k rises (falls).

  17. . ~ 1/(1 - ) { s } ~ k =  +  +  . K K k = k ~ • Equilibrium point, k, found by setting k = 0, in (15), with the solution: • k/s > 0, e.g. increase in savings rate increases k. • (15) is globally stable: capital stock always adjusts over time such that k converges to k. • With k constant at k, capital stock grows at the rate, • Figure 11.3. ~ ~ ~ gK = = A/A + L/L =  + , . . ~

  18. Because K equals ALk,capital’s growth rate will equal the growth rate of effective labor at k. • At k, output grows at a rate gY = A/A + L/L =  + , . . ~ ~ • Since Y = ALy and y is constant at k , output grows at the rate of growth of effective labor. • Growth of capital per worker and output per worker (labor productivity), are given by, gK/L = gK - L/L = , gY/L = gY - L/L =  (20) . ~ ~ . ~ ~

  19. On the balanced growth path, the growth rate of output per worker is determined solely by growth of technological progress. • Rate of return on capital, r, and wage rate, w, are given by: r = k - 1 - , and w = (1 - )Ak 

  20. A Digression on Low-Income Traps

  21. Setting n = n(k)in (15), k = sk - (n(k)+  + ) . • Endogenously determined labor supply can lead to a dynamically stable, low-steady-state level of y. • Figure 11.4 displays a situation where n(k)is negative at low levels of k, positive at intermediate levels of k, and again negativeat higher values of k, leading to multiple equilibria and the possibility of a low level trap.

  22. Rosenstein-Rodan (1961) and Murphy, Shleifer, and Vishny (1989) show that a big push, e.g. an exogenous increase in savings, can bring the economy up to a higher, more stable equilibrium path.

  23. Population, Savings, and Steady-State Output

  24. With exogenous population growth: • A decline in population growth from nH to nL causes the following results in Solow-Swan • See Figure 11.5: • k increases until reaching kL > kH, output per worker, Akrises, but in the long run, Y/L grows at . ~ ~ • If the saving rate, s, increases: • sk shifts up and to the left, k rises from kL to kH , Akrises, but in the long run, Y/L grows at . • See Figure 11.6. ~ ~ ~

  25. Savings and Consumption • Consumption per unit of effective labor, c, is given by c = (1 - sL)k , i = sk(21) • On the balanced growth path, with sk = (n +  + )k c = k - (n +  + )k and, c/s = [k - 1 - (n +  + )] k/s>/<0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

  26. c/s is positive (negative) when marginal product of capital, k - 1 , is greater (lower) than(n +  + ). ~ ~ • Elasticity of y with respect to s, , given by:  =  / (1 - ) (23) • Low  implies that y/k is low, that the actual investment curve, sk, bendssharply and that FK is low.

  27. Speed of Adjustment

  28. k (k - k), (24) where  = - (1 - )(n +  + ) < 0 . ~ • Important to assess the speed at which adjustment to a new equilibrium proceeds. • Changes in k can be approximated by

  29. Solution of (24) given by k - k  e t(k0-k) and y - y  e t(y0-y) (25) ~ ~ ~ ~ • (25) indicates that  * 100 percent of the initial gap between output per worker and its steady state level is closed every year.

  30.  = (y - y0)/(y - y0) ~ • Adjustment ratio,, is the fraction of change from y0 to y completed after t years: using (25)  = 1 - et • Time taken to achieve a given fraction  of the adjustment is given by t* = ln(1 - )/   - /

  31. Model Predictions and Empirical Facts

  32. Predictions of the Solow-Swan Model: • Capital-effective labor ratio, marginal product of capital, and output per units of effective labor, are constant on the balanced growth path. • Steady-state growth rate of capital per worker K/L and output per worker Y/L are determined solely by the rate of technological progress. In particular, neither variable depends on the saving rate or on the specific form of the production function. • Output, capital stock, and effective labor all grow at the same rate, given by the sum of the growth rate of the labor force and the growth rate of technological progress.

  33. Reduction in the population growth rate raises the steady-state levels of the capital-effective labor ratio and output in efficiency units and lowers the rate of growth of output, the capital stock, and effective labor. • Rise in the saving rate also increases the capital-effective labor ratio and output in efficiency units in the long run, but has no effect on the steady-state growth rates of output, the capital stock, and effective labor.

  34. The Empirical Evidence: Support • Data from industrialcountries suggests that growth rates of labor, capital, and output are each roughly constant (Romer, 1989). • Growth of output and capital are about equal and are larger than the labor growth rate. In industrial countries output per worker and capital per worker are rising over time. • As shown in Figures 10.2 and 10.3, evidence on the relationship between the level of income and both population growth and savings are consistent with the model.

  35. The Empirical Evidence: Baggage • Strong empirical relationship between growth of per capita income and both the savings rate and the share of investment in output. Solow-Swan predicts no association. • Observed differences in y are far too large to be accounted for by differences in physical capital per worker. • Attributing differences in output to differences in capital without differences in the the effectiveness of labor implies large variations in the rate of return of capital (Lucas, 1990).

  36. The only source of variation in income per capita growth rates across countries is labor effectiveness, . But the model is incomplete because this driving force of long-run growth is exogenous to Solow-Swan.

More Related