1 / 30

NeST: Network Storage Technologies

NeST: Network Storage Technologies. Building I/O Appliances on Commodity Systems John Bent, Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi Arpaci-Dusseau and Miron Livny. http://www.ioappliance . com. Outline. Introduction Case studies Storage modules Conclusion. Problem Statement.

dale-whitfield
Télécharger la présentation

NeST: Network Storage Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NeST: Network Storage Technologies Building I/O Appliances on Commodity Systems John Bent, Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi Arpaci-Dusseau and Miron Livny http://www.ioappliance.com

  2. Outline • Introduction • Case studies • Storage modules • Conclusion

  3. Problem Statement Appliances are attractive because they are robust, reliable, available and especially because they are easy to use. To fulfill these criteria, traditional network appliances impose policy decisions on their users and are built either as kernel modules or upon specially designed kernels. “How to build portable, configurable I/O appliances?”

  4. Goal To create a network-storage “template” that produces a range of I/O appliances according to the storage needs of the target application and any constraints of the host system. Perfect I/O Appliance Target App Network Storage Technologies Host System

  5. Host system constraints • Thread support • Raw disk access • Select interface

  6. Target app. storage needs • Invariant and variant storage needs • Invariant • Reliable • Low latency • High bandwidth • Easy to administer • Cheap

  7. Target app. storage needs • Variant • Write concurrency • Replacement costs • Security and authentication needs • Communication protocol • Transfer unit

  8. Outline • Introduction • Case studies • Storage modules • Conclusion

  9. Building I/O appliances • Four case studies • ReqEx • WiND • Web proxy cache • Condor checkpoint server

  10. Queue of Reqs Huge tape library (terabytes) Tape Robot What is ReqEx? ReqEx Staging Area A robot moves archived data one tape at a time to a temporary staging area.

  11. Condor Manager Perfect I/O Appliance Compute cluster What is ReqEx? WAN ReqEx Staging Area Data is transferred and stored locally to facilitate access by compute nodes.

  12. ReqEx variant storage needs • Write concurrency • No write (or read) concurrency • Replacement costs • Tape robot is very slow; objects cannot be lost • Security and authentication needs • Only owner can remove object • Protocol • ReqEx can be linked with NeST client library • Transfer unit • Whole object transfers only

  13. What is WiND?

  14. WiND variant storage needs • Write concurrency • No write concurrency • Replacement costs • Unknown • Security and authentication needs • Unknown • Protocol • Predefined specific WiND protocol • Transfer unit • Disk blocks are accessed directly

  15. Local Area Network What is a web proxy cache? Internet Frequently accessed objects can be stored locally to decrease request latencies. Perfect I/O Appliance

  16. Cache variant storage needs • Write concurrency • No write concurrency • Replacement costs • Negligible • Security and authentication needs • None • Protocol • HTTP • Transfer unit • Whole object transfer only

  17. A condor job runs on an execute machine. Keyboard activity causes the job to be evicted. A snapshot of the process is sent to the checkpoint server. Perfect I/O Appliance When the job migrates to another idle machine, the checkpoint file is recovered and progress resumes. What is Condor ckpt server?

  18. CCS variant storage needs • Write concurrency • No write concurrency • Replacement costs • The running time of the job (could be months) • Security and authentication needs • Unauthorized access cannot be allowed • Protocol • Can link with NeST client library • Transfer unit • Whole file transfer only I see you’re discussing checkpointing. Don’t forget about incremental.

  19. Outline • Introduction • Case studies • Storage modules • Conclusion

  20. Storage modules Protocols Name Space Static Configuration Administrative Interface Concurrency Architectures Runtime Adaptation Storage Management Data Semantics

  21. Configurable Components • Concurrency architecture • Data semantics • Protocol layer • Namespace • Security and authentication • Storage management

  22. NOB POT POP Concurrency architecture “How can multiple storage requests be interleaved to maximize system throughput?” Easy ... but uninteresting.

  23. Data semantics • Must stored objects be protected from concurrent writes? • Is transaction support necessary? • What are the recovery costs for lost objects?

  24. Protocol layer • Most applications can not link with NeST client libraries • Most applications have their own specific communication protocols “How can a protocol layer easily communicate with arbitrary networking protocols?” Tower of Babel

  25. Namespace • Flat • Hierarchical “How do clients uniquely identify their stored objects?”

  26. Security and authentication • Ownership • Privacy • Encryption • Authentication • Access rights

  27. Storage management • Native filesystem • Raw disk access • Uninteresting from client perspective

  28. Outline • Introduction • Case studies • Storage modules • Conclusion

  29. Conclusions and future work • Conclusions • None • Future work • Lots Maybe you should try a little harder.

  30. Conclusions and future work • How to most easily identify the variant storage needs of the target application? • Config file? • Installation script? • Run-time monitoring? • How to ensure that performance is at least as good as an appliance specifically designed for the target application?

More Related