90 likes | 213 Vues
This report evaluates the online facilitation assessment in the context of FRCC's Online Instructor Certification program. Conducted over a four-week period, the process involved multiple attempts and a comprehensive review of instructional design. Emphasizing the importance of data collection, the study references the "Assessing Online Facilitation" (AOF) instrument developed by California State University faculty. The evaluation assesses strengths and weaknesses of the course and includes insights gathered through surveys and direct experiences with the instructional delivery methods.
E N D
Assessing Ourselves FRCC’s Investigation of Online Facilitation Assessment
Online Instructor Certification • Lecture & Discussion • Pedagogy • Process • Concepts • 4 weeks • Web Quest • Institutional processes • Must score 100% (or discuss missed answers with OL staff) • 3 attempts over 4 weeks • D2L Competency Review • Tool usage • Required language in syllabus • Returned for revisions until complete • Up to 6 months to complete
Plan to redesign course over Summer 2011 • Online Instructor Certification course created Summer 2009 (with minor adjustments since that time) • Instructional designers see the time coming to re-evaluate/re-design the course • How can we collect data for this process
Origin of Facilitation Report • Concurrent with the desire to examine our own practice, we became aware of the “Assessing Online Facilitation” (AOF) instrument created by faculty and staff in the California State University system • http://www.humboldt.edu/aof/team.htm
Two Parts of the Assessment Tool Facilitation Instrument Activity Record
Use of data when setting up next session • Use of tool made us more aware of strengths/weakness of course • Changes to location/access of form itself • Created SurveyMonkey to get even more info about course success
Question: How do you evaluate success of your instructional delivery? (formative and summative)