1 / 47

Language, its development and pathologies

Language, its development and pathologies. Isabelle Rapin Pediatric Neurology Seminar, Dec. 4, 2013 No conflict of interest . Tools to investigate brain basis of behavior. Behavioral observation, neuropsychology Brain lesions, diseases Inhibitory rTMS (transient virtual focal lesions)

damon
Télécharger la présentation

Language, its development and pathologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language, its development and pathologies Isabelle Rapin Pediatric Neurology Seminar, Dec. 4, 2013 No conflict of interest

  2. Tools to investigate brain basis of behavior • Behavioral observation, neuropsychology • Brain lesions, diseases • Inhibitory rTMS (transient virtual focal lesions) • Histology (incl. focal gene expression) • Structural imaging: CT, MRI, DTI (connectivity) • Metabolism: PET (glucose, metabolites, transmitters) • ↑ blood flow during task : fMRI (BOLD) • Electrophysiology: EEG, ERP • Magnetoencephalography

  3. Some advantages/drawbacks of these tools • All: group data, comparisons, baseline problem • Electrophysiology/MEG: real time data • EEG/ERP: good time, poor spatial resolution • MEG: realtime, subcortical data, expensive and not widely available • fMRI: reasonable spatial but not time resolution. Most require cooperative subj., but advantage of clever experiments. • PET: radiation, etc.

  4. Language in the brain

  5. What is language? • In the individual: A computational system between thought and an acoustic signal (Hickok, 2006) • Among people: A shared medium to transmit information

  6. Oral – speech Written – reading, writing Gestural – Sign Somatosensory - Braille Mathematical notation Chemical, genetic symbols, etc. Musical notation Dance notation Blue prints Etc., etc. Multiple language modalities(all: sensory → code/grammar → motor)

  7. Levels of language • Phonology - sound units of language • Grammar/syntax - word order, word markers [morphemes], grammatical [closed class] words • Semantics - interface of (known) words – lexicon - to meaning • Pragmatics - communicative intent, verbal, non-verbal (prosody, gestures)

  8. Steps in language processing Input Output (sensory) (motor) Decoding Higher order Encoding processing

  9. Steps in language processing • Input: sound to language (phonetics) • Decoding input: phonological form + lexical/semantic information • Comprehension/programming: grammar, sentence. Working verbal memory, executive skills, attention… • Programming output: lexical item + phonological form • Output: motor, i.e., speech, other language modalities

  10. Classic view: Language areas in the left hemisphere

  11. Classic view: Language connectivity: left hemisphere Peoppel et al., 2012

  12. Current view of language in the left hemisphere Dorsal stream Map sound to articulation Dorsal stream Ventral stream Map sound to meaning Gow 2012

  13. Language Processing Circuitry • Primary auditory cortex (Heschel gyrus) ↔ • Post. sup. temporal gyrus/sulc. (Wernicke) • Ventral lexicon (post. middle temp. gyr. ↔ temporal pole (semantic hub) • Ventral stream↔ inf. frontal (Broca) • Dorsal lexicon (inf. parietal, supramargin. gyr.) • Dorsal stream↔ premotor cortex and↔ Broca (phonological loop, rehearsal – work. memory)

  14. Schematic of language processing:current view 4. 3.. 1 2. 5. 3. 4. Hickok 2009

  15. Functional language processing:dorsal and ventral streams A ATI Ant.temporal lobe PM Premotor cortex BA Broca area SMG Supramarginal gyrus AUD Auditory cortex Spt Syvian parietal (Left only MTG/ITG Middle/inferior temporal gyrus STG Superior temporal gyrus Hickok 2009

  16. Interhemispheric language processing • Audition –sound → phonetic: bilateral • Dorsal pathway -- phoneme and articulation: left • Ventral pathway – map sound to meaning: left >> right • Map words to thoughts (syntax, sentence): bilateral distributed network • Map communicative intent (pragmatics): right

  17. Lateralization of phonologic tasks(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Left Right Vigneau et al., 2011

  18. Lateralization of lexical semantic tasks(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Left Right Vigneau et al., 2011

  19. Lateralization of syntax, sentences(meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies) Vigneau et al., 2011

  20. Interfaces of language with short term/working memory • Auditory buffer (aud. assoc. cortex) ↔ • Prefrontal cortex ↔ perirhinal cortex, hippocampus ↔ temporal cortex (working memory + episodic-semantic memory) (ventral stream + fornix & mammillo/ thalamic cingulate connections) • Ventral interconnects dorsal stream (articul.) Child & Benarroch, Neurology Nov. 19, 2013 Battaglia et al., Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012

  21. Language development

  22. Hearing is present in utero Cochlea is full size by the end of the second trimester Infant hears in utero, e.g., mother’s heart beat, borborygmi, voice Hearing acuity good and testable at birth, matures during the first year Latency of obligatory auditory ERPs decreases with maturation

  23. Sequence of language development • Phonology: at birth, function of language exposure → bilingual advantage • Pragmatics: at birth • Semantics: starts at ~6 months • Syntax: by ~ 2 years • Reading: starts at preschool

  24. Stages of language development • Neonate – hears speech sounds relevant to all languages, hones the ones heard, loses others • ~ 1 year -- Single word holophrastic utterances • ~ 18-24 mos. – start of 2 word utterances, mostly rote echoes • ~ 24-30 mos. – 2 word utterances increase, become individualized, start of grammatic rules • ~ 3-4 years – sentences of increasing complexity • Fully mature syntax -- → ~age 10 yrs or more

  25. Semantic development Infants develop awareness of permanence in the face of transformation (sounds, moving faces, objects, movements, own body parts) Infants associate speech sounds with permanent stimuli By 1 year: they understand some words, point to say “gimme” or “look”, may have a few meaningful words

  26. Syntactic development Starts at the 2 word stage, usually around 2 years Two word stage usually starts when toddler has some 50 words in lexicon Sentences with articles, pronouns, and, later, morphologic markers, usually established by 3 years Very complex syntax not achieved until well into the school years

  27. Are late talking toddlers at risk for specific language impairment? Courtesy: D. Thal

  28. Normal Variability Number of words produced in relation to number of words understood by 12- to 16-month-old children at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories Number of words produced Number of words understood

  29. Variability in normal development Range of word produced by typically-developing girls on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (Fenson, Dale, Reznick, Thal, Bates, Hartung, Pethick, & Reilly, 1993)

  30. When to worry (1) Questionable hearing at any age, including at birth,  refer to audiology No reciprocal eye gaze/dialog at any age No pointing by 1 year No comprehension of speech ≥1 year No turning when called by name ≥15 months < 10 words at 18 mos No 2 word phrases at ≥2 years

  31. When to worry (2) Unintelligible to parents at 2 years Unintelligible to strangers at 3 years Language not communicative, e.g., talks to no one in particular Abnormal features of speech: echolalia, scripts, pedantic vocabulary, aberrant prosody (e.g., robotic, singsong), selective mutism Any loss of language milestones (including communicative gestures)

  32. Useful clinical language tools • MacArthur Development Communicative Inventories. L. Fensonet al. Paul Brookes, 1993 • For kids < 30 months. Infant and verbal toddler versions • Parents collect the data on comprehension, production and use • Extremely well standardized in multiple languages • Early Language Milestone Scale. J. Coplan, Pro-Ed 1987, ELM-2 2012 • For kids < 3 years. Scored by observer. Quick • Format similar to the Denver • ELM-2: also for older DLD kids, , uses a kit

  33. DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDERS (DLDs)a.k.a.SPECIFIC LANGUAGE DISORDERS (SLIs)or DYSPHASIAS

  34. Differential diagnosis of inadequate language development Hearing loss Specific language disorder (dysphasia) Intellectual deficiency Autism Selective mutism (recording of normal speech required!

  35. 2 types of information the child neurologist needs to make a specific behavioral language diagnosis The familiar input – processing – output brain pathway Levels of language encoding

  36. Steps in language processing Input Output (sensory) (motor) Decoding Higher order Encoding processing

  37. Levels of language encoding (1) • Phonology – speech sounds • phonetics – segmental • prosody – suprasegmental • Grammar • syntax (word order) • morphology (word endings, etc.)

  38. Levels of language encoding (2) • Semantics – meaning of utterances • lexicon – word dictionary in brain • meaning of connected speech • Pragmatics – conversational language • verbal – turn taking, referencing, etc. • nonverbal – facial expression, gestures, body posture, prosody

  39. Associated deficits (frequent!) • Oromotor deficits (pseudobulbar palsy, etc.): • frequent in dysfluent children with verbal dyspraxia and those with mixed receptive/expressive disorders • but do not “cause” the language disorder • Intellectual deficiency: • does not cause specific language disorders • Autism: • intellectual deficiency & lack of drive to communicate = inadequate explanations for the language disorder • Selective mutism: • must have recording of allegedly “normal” speech at home

  40. Types of dysphasia • “Pure” expressive(comprehension OK, pragmatics OK, affects only phonology ± syntax) • fluent but phonology very impaired (phonologic programming -- PP) • dysfluent or mute (verbal dyspraxia -- VD) • Mixed expressive/receptive(affect phonology + syntax + semantics ± pragmatics) • comprehension ≥ expression (phonologic-syntactic or MER) • no comprehension = verbal auditory agnosia (verbal auditory agnosia VAA) • Higher order processing(semantics ± pragmatics) • word finding deficit dysfluent, immature syntax(lexical syntactic -- LS) • fluent, verbose, comprehend less than they can say, use scripts. Most often in Asperger-type children (semantic pragmatic --SP)

  41. DLD proposed syndromes • SP semantic/pragmatic • LS lexical syntactic • PP phonologic programming • VD verbal dyspraxia • MER/PS mixed expressive receptive or phonologic syntactic • VAA verbal auditory agnosia

  42. Work-up, Prognosis

  43. Standard Work-up of DLD Preschooler • Physical/neurologic evaluation: syndrome? • Family history • Formal hearing evaluation unless phonology is 100% OK • Rarely need for EEG, imaging, genetics (several genes now known) unless for research • Refer to speech pathology (and psychology) • Refer to preschool (more effective than speech Rx alone) • Follow-up needed: most speak but later problems likely (see Rutter 1881, Aram, 1984 Beichtman 1996, etc.)

  44. Gender Not ethnicity Bilingual exposure? Family income Parental education Ear infections . First degree relatives with history of Learning/reading disability Speech or language disorders Neurological disorders Use of gestures # of words understood # of words produced Potential Outcome Predictors inDevelopmental Language Disorders

  45. Course of language development in DLD/SLI • Classification is not stable • More children move out of or into the category than remain in it between 3 an 5 years of age (Silva) • Children with delays in comprehension and production are at greater risk for continued “delay” than those with normal comprehension (Bishop, Silva, Tallal) • Younger children at start of intervention tend to have a better prognosis (Bishop, Silva, Tallal) Donna J. Thal Ph.D.

  46. Course of development in DLD 5 ½ y. DLD with normal language scores: likely to remain in the normal range on such tests (Bishop) However, lower phonological processing scores likely half read below age level, at 15 years of age (Stothard et al., 1998)

More Related