1 / 18

request fOR proposals

request fOR proposals. Preliminary Survey of ICOLC Members ICOLC Meeting in Munich, Germany October 20, 2008 Katherine A. Perry VIVA Director. Survey – Who Responded Which Consortia DON’T Do RFPs Which Consortia DO Do RFPs Areas Considered Most Difficult Areas Where ICOLC Might Help

danae
Télécharger la présentation

request fOR proposals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. request fORproposals Preliminary Survey of ICOLC Members ICOLC Meeting in Munich, Germany October 20, 2008 Katherine A. Perry VIVA Director

  2. Survey – Who Responded Which Consortia DON’T Do RFPs Which Consortia DO Do RFPs Areas Considered Most Difficult Areas Where ICOLC Might Help What We Don’t Know….

  3. RFPs and RFTs Both are publicly advertised invitations to submit an offer to supply goods or services. Both require detailed specifications.

  4. RFPs and RFTs, cont’d But, there appear to be some major differences. RFP in Virginia – MUST negotiate price. While we cannot disclose specific contents of other proposals, we can and do let vendors know if they are in the ballpark. We ask for their “Best and Final Offer” and then re-evaluate the proposals. RFT in Europe – may NOT negotiate price. The written proposal is the final word.

  5. VIVA’s RFP Process * 6-9 months http://www.vivalib.org/VIVARFP2008.html * Subcommittee writes RFP * Allow 30 days for responses * Product Trials and Solicit Feedback from Members * Evaluation #1 * Finalists Presentations for Members * Negotiations * Evaluation #2 * Award(s) made

  6. 202 Consortia in ICOLC 2008 44 124 13 8 3 7 +2 multinational

  7. 30 Consortia Completed Survey 21 (70%) 124 (17%) 6 (20%) 44 (14%) 1 (3%) 13 (8%) 1 (3%) 8 (13%) 0 3 0 7 1 multi (3%) +2 multi (50%)

  8. Who Doesn’t do RFPs or RFTs? Of those who completed the survey, 10 (33.3%) said NO, they do not do RFPs. * 6 North America (US and Canada) * 2 Europe * 1 Asia * 1 Multi-regional (Africa, Asia, Europe and N. America)

  9. Who Does RFPs or RFTs? Of those who completed the survey, 20 (66.7%) said YES they do RFPs. * 15 North America (US and Canada) * 4 Europe * 1 Australia/New Zealand * 0 Africa * 0 Asia

  10. % Government Support

  11. Why do RFPs or RFTs?

  12. Why do RFPs or RFTs?

  13. Issues: Easy or Difficult?

  14. Issues Easy or Difficult?

  15. Where Can ICOLC Help?

  16. Where Can ICOLC Help?

  17. High Priority for ICOLC

  18. More Questions than Answers… * Do we have a clear understanding of what RFPs and RFTs are? * What are real differences among states/provinces, countries, regions? * Response rate good or not? Should we seek to involve more consortia, esp. outside of Europe and North America? * What do consortia use the RFP to acquire? Products or Services? (ILS, Aggregated Databases) * How best to identify possible issues and possible solutions? * Vendors: What are their issues and how best to involve them?

More Related