1 / 9

Assessment of Planning Coordinator Function Survey Results for Western Electricity Council

In November 2013, the System Review Work Group (SRWG) conducted a survey to identify modeling gaps for the Planning Coordinator function in anticipation of MOD-032 compliance. A follow-up survey by the Planning Coordinator Function Task Force was distributed in September 2014 to Primary Compliance and TSS contacts to address previously identified issues. The findings revealed that 20 Planning Coordinators amended their SRWG survey responses, with 656 significant bus changes documented. This report details the modifications from the initial responses, including removals and additions from key stakeholders.

dane-hodges
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment of Planning Coordinator Function Survey Results for Western Electricity Council

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning Coordinator Function Task Force Survey Results Doug Tucker Associate Staff Engineer Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  2. In November 2013 the System Review Work Group (SRWG) conducted a “Planning Coordinator” survey to identify potential modeling gaps in preparation for MOD-032 • In September 2014 the Planning Coordinator Function Task Force sent out a similar survey • Sent to Primary Compliance and TSS contacts • Identify issues that have been addressed since SRWG survey was distributed Background Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  3. 20 Planning Coordinators had changes to their initial SRWG survey response 9Planning Coordinators had no changes to their initial SRWG survey response 656 bus changes to the initial SRWG survey responses were identified through the PCFTF survey Responses Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  4. Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  5. WAPA RMR claimed 200 of the 390 Tri-State Buses in the “WAPA RMR” base case area • LADWP removed buses belonging to the following owners • City of Burbank (17 buses) • City of Glendale (19 buses) • WAPA UGP added 10 buses Significate Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  6. BPA included • Jefferson County PUD (12 buses) • Lower Valley Power & Light (22 buses) • Various Generator Owned (72 buses) • BPA removed • Douglas County PUD (24 buses) • PSColoradohas removed 30 buses Significate Changes from the PCFTF Survey Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  7. PC Area Differences from SRWG Survey Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  8. Potential Gaps within certain Areas Western Electricity Coordinating Council

  9. Potential Gaps within certain Areas Western Electricity Coordinating Council

More Related