1 / 20

Nitrate Challenges: The Lost Creek Alluvial Fan

Nitrate Challenges: The Lost Creek Alluvial Fan. Laura Alvey Groundwater Remediation Program April 23, 2014. Lost Creek. Stillwater River. Lost Creek. Stillwater River. Lost Creek Fan Shallow (<150 ft ) Potentiometric Surface Map (August 2008). Lost Creek Fan Subsurface:

danil
Télécharger la présentation

Nitrate Challenges: The Lost Creek Alluvial Fan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nitrate Challenges: The Lost Creek Alluvial Fan Laura Alvey Groundwater Remediation Program April 23, 2014

  2. Lost Creek Stillwater River

  3. Lost Creek Stillwater River

  4. Lost Creek Fan Shallow (<150 ft) Potentiometric Surface Map (August 2008)

  5. Lost Creek Fan Subsurface: • Cobbles and boulders • Sand lenses • Highly permeable

  6. What’s the Problem? MBMG Study

  7. What’s the Problem? ?

  8. Nitrate Source Identification (Where is it coming from?) • Enforcement under MT Water Quality Act: responsibility based on causation • Important for fate and transport analysis: • Where did nitrate enter the environment? • Who/what is being affected? • Where is it going? • What can we learn to better manage nitrate in future?

  9. Challenge: Many Nitrate Sources

  10. Septic Systems Center Pivots

  11. Tools for Nitrate Source Identification • Stable isotope analysis of NO3 nitrogen and oxygen • Analysis of co-contaminants • Pharmaceuticals, residential wastes (caffeine, artificial sweeteners) • Agricultural chemicals (herbicides, pesticides, other fertilizers) • Metals (boron) • Chloride, other major ions • Bacteria

  12. General Findings • Nitrate highest in shallow (<150 ft) wells • Deeper wells have less nitrate (why?) • Stabile nitrate levels between 2002-2011 • Isotope results: no clear single source, but suggest fertilizer as a dominant source where nitrate is highest • Co-contaminants: nitrate and chlorides trend together, other results inconclusive/mixed

  13. Effective Nitrate Management: • Permitting programs need to recognize susceptible resources • Increased inspections of sensitive sites to ensure compliance

  14. Effective Nitrate Management: • Permitting programs need to recognize susceptible resources • Increased inspections of sensitive sites to ensure compliance

  15. Effective Nitrate Management • Encourage Best Management Practices • Soil moisture sensors • Soil testing • Crop selection • Use of shallow versus deep aquifer

  16. Effective Nitrate Management: • Property owner education: fertilizers use, well testing, septic upkeep • Require engineered septic systems in sensitive areas • Require domestic wells completed in deep aquifer • Require well completion to minimize cross-contamination

  17. Effective Management • Baseline monitoring important (MBMG, Ag, USGS) • Track impacted groundwater (statewide?)

  18. Questions/Comments?

More Related