1 / 40

Maximizing Path Durations in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Maximizing Path Durations in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Yijie Han and Richard J. La Department of ECE & ISR University of Maryland, College Park CISS, Princeton University March 22nd, 2006. Outline. Background Basic Model Setup Distributional convergence Proposed algorithm

dannon
Télécharger la présentation

Maximizing Path Durations in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maximizing Path Durations in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Yijie Han and Richard J. La Department of ECE & ISR University of Maryland, College Park CISS, Princeton University March 22nd, 2006

  2. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • Maximizing expected path durations • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  3. Background • Ad hoc network routing protocols • Table-driven routing protocols (proactive) • Attempt to maintain consistent, up-to-date routing information from each node to every other node in the network. • Each node maintains one or more tables to store routing information. • Example: DSDV(Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector), WRP (Wireless Routing Protocol), etc • On-demand routing protocol (reactive) • Attempt to minimize the number of required broadcasts by providing a path only when requested • Require path/route discovery phase/mechanism • Examples: AODV( Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing)

  4. Motivation • On-demand routing protocols in ad-hoc networks • Path recovery procedure initiated when an existing path is broken • Disruption in network service to applications • Performance and overhead shaped by the distribution of link and path durations • Suggests that (expected) path duration should be taken into account when selecting a path • Reduce overhead • Provide more reliable network service to applications • Requires understanding of statistical properties of path duration

  5. Existing protocols • Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) • Selects the first discovered route • Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) • Selects the min-hop route • Associativity Based Routing (ABR) • Each node maintains “associativity” for each neighbor from beacons • Higher beacon counts = more stable links • Destination selects the path with the highest average associativity

  6. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  7. Connectivity between nodes • {0, 1}-valued reachability process between two nodes • xij(t) = 1 – if the link (i,j) is up • xij(t) = 0 – if the link (i,j) is down • xij(t) = xji(t) – symmetric links Basic Model (for studying statistical properties of path duration) • V = {1, …, I} - set of mobile nodes moving across a domain D of R2 or R3 • - location/trajectory of node i

  8. Basic Model Basic Model • Link durations • {Uij(k), k = 1, 2, ,…} and {Dij(k), k = 1, 2, …} • Uij(k) (resp. Dij(k)) – duration ofk-thup (resp. down) time • Time-varying graph (V, E(t)) t

  9. Basic Model • Path discovery phase • Path available between s and d if a set of links provides connectivity • May not be unique • Routing algorithm selects one • Denote the set of links along the selected path byLsd(t) n4 n1 n2 s d n3

  10. Excess Life and Path Duration • For each link • - time to live or excess life after time t • Time to live or duration of a path • Path available till one of the links goes down • Path duration = amount of time that elapses till one of the links in breaks down

  11. Question:What does the distribution of look like? • In particular, when the hop counter is large • In a large scale MANET, the number of hops is expected to be large

  12. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup – Parametric Scenario and Difficulties • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  13. Parametric Scenario • Scaling: For each fixed n = 1, 2, …, • -- set of mobile nodes • -- domain across which nodes move • Stationarity:Reachability processes jointly stationary • constitutes a stationary sequence with generic marginals • - CDF of • A pair of source and destination nodes selected at time t = 0 for each n

  14. Parametric Scenario (cont’d) • Define • Excess or residual life of a link • Distribution of forward recurrence time • Follows from elementary renewal theory

  15. Parametric Scenario (cont’d) • Path duration - • Explore the distributional properties of the rvs as

  16. Sources of Difficulty • - random set that depends on • Assume is a deterministic sequence with for convenience Example: • Fix the domain, and randomly select the locations of the source and destination • Randomly place n2 – 2 other nodes in the domain • Transmission range decreases as 1/n • Number of hops along the shortest path increases with n

  17. Sources of Difficulty (cont’d) • Dependence of reachability processes • Introduces dependence in link excess lives • Asymptotic independence – dependence in link excess lives goes away asymptotically as hop distance increases • Mixing conditions

  18. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  19. Assumptions • Assumption 1: (scaling) There exists such that where • Scaling introduced for defining limit distribution parameter • Assumption 2: For every and any given there exists an integer such that • Interpretation:probability that a link duration is strictly • positive is one

  20. Definitions • Array of -valued rvs • for notational convenience

  21. Definitions • Let be a sequence of real numbers • Usually increases with n

  22. Definitions • Sufficient condition:

  23. Assumptions • Define • A sufficient condition is that there exists an arbitrarily small constant e > 0 such that for all and

  24. Assumptions

  25. Interpretation of Assumption 4

  26. Distributional convergence • Implications: For sufficiently large hop count, the expected path duration can be approximated by

  27. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  28. Proposed algorithm • Link durations seen by a node likely to depend on its own type and the types of neighbors • Different nodes with different speeds and capabilities • Each node maintains average link durations • Can maintain a separate average for each type of neighbors • Average link duration used as estimate of expected link durations (during path discovery)

  29. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results - AODV • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  30. NS-2 simulation - Setup • Modified AODV routing protocol • 200 nodes in 2 km x 2 km rectangular region • Transmission range = 250 m • Two classes of nodes • Nodes with different speed (e.g., soldiers vs. jeeps or tanks) • Class 1 node speed ~ [1, 5] m/s • Class 2 node speed ~ [10, 30] m/s • Varying mixture • Class1:Class2 = 140:60, 160:40, and 180:20

  31. NS-2 simulation

  32. NS-2 simulation

  33. NS-2 simulation

  34. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  35. Estimation of expected path duration • Recall: For sufficiently large hop count, the expected path duration can be approximated by • Question: For finite hop counts, how good is this approximation? • For back-up paths • Local recovery after a link failure

  36. Threshold update – local recovery • Select a back-up path only if the estimated probability of being available exceeds a certain threshold • Probability of being available estimated to be • Not accurate due to discrepancy in exp. parameter and collected IPD value (sum of inverses of expected link durations) • Target probability • Update the threshold as follows where is the threshold after n back-up path tries and is the indicator function of a back-up path being available Amount of time since last update

  37. Threshold update • Define to be the indicator function of the event that a selected backup path is available when the threshold value is • and - unknown distribution of and its mean, respectively • Assume (i) is strictly increasing in , and (ii) there exists such that

  38. Outline • Background • Basic Model • Setup • Distributional convergence • Proposed algorithm • NS-2 simulation results • Parameter update • Conclusion & Future Directions

  39. Conclusions & Future Directions • Studied the statistical properties of path durations in MANETS • Showed distributional convergence with increasing hop count • Relationship between link durations and path duration • Proposed an algorithm for maximizing expected durations of selected paths • Stochastic approximation based algorithm for handling the discrepancy between IPD values and exponential parameters • Plan to implement with other on-demand routing protocols • Validation of assumptions • Convergence speed

  40. Proposed algorithm in AODV • Each node maintains a route entry from each known dest node • Up to k paths (instead of a single path in AODV) • (i) dest seq. number, (ii) next hop, (iii) hop count, and (iv) Inverse Path Duration (IPD) • IPD = sum of the inverses of average link durations reported in a path reply message • Paths ranked based on (i) seq. number, (ii) IPD value, (iii) hop count • Request message • (i) src ID, seq. number, (ii) broadcast ID, (iii) dest ID and seq. number, and (iv) hop count to the src • Reply message • (i) dest ID, (ii) dest seq. number, (iii) IPD value, and (iv) hop count • Either an intermediate node or dest generates a reply message • Intermediate node – copy information from its entry • Dest node – initialize IPD and hop count to zero

More Related