1 / 9

Sequential Imputations and Bayesian Approaches to Missing Data Problems

This paper by Augustin Kong, Jun Liu, and Wing Hung Wong, published in the Journal of the American Statistical Association, presents a Bayesian framework for handling missing data through sequential imputations. The authors discuss the challenges posed by incomplete observations and propose an importance sampling technique using Gibbs sampling to draw independent samples from the conditional distribution. The methodology involves iterative steps to estimate the predictive probabilities of missing values, ultimately yielding posterior distributions that can be applied to inferential statistics.

dara
Télécharger la présentation

Sequential Imputations and Bayesian Approaches to Missing Data Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SEQUENTIAL IMPUTATIONS AND BAYESIAN MISSING DATA PROBLEMS • AUGUSTING KONG, JUN LIU WING HUNG WONG • JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION MARCH 1994 VOL 89 NO. 425

  2. Setting • X=(x1,…xn)=(y1, z1,…yn, zn)=(Y, Z) • If an observation l is complete, then yl=xl

  3. Goal

  4. Importance sampling • Draw m independent copies of Z’s from the conditional distribution p(Z|Y) and then approximate

  5. problem • Drawing from p(Z|Y) directly is usually difficult • Gibbs sampler or data augmentation do this approximately by iterations

  6. Sequential Imputation • Step 1: • Draw zt* from the conditional distribution p(zt|y1, z1*,…yt-1, zt-1*, yt). Notice that the zt*’s had to be drawn sequentially, because each zt* is drawn conditioned on the previously imputed missing part z1*,…,zt-1*

  7. Sequential Imputation • Step2: • Compute the predictive probabilities p(yt|y1, z1*,…,yt-1, zt-1*) and • wt=wt-1 p(yt|y1, z1*,…,yt-1, zt-1*) • Let w=wn, so that • W=p(y1)π p(yt|y1, z1*,…,yt-1, zt-1*) , for t=2…n

  8. Sequential Imputation • Step1 and step2 are done repeatedly and independently for m times • Let the results be denoted by Z*(1), Z*(2),…Z*(m) and w(1),…w(2), where Z*(j)=(z1*(j),…zn*(j)) for j=1…m

  9. Sequential Imputation • Posterior distribution:

More Related