1 / 19

Lessons from the meta-evaluation of MGNREGA

Lessons from the meta-evaluation of MGNREGA. Ranjani.K.Murthy Engendering Policy through Evaluation Project- ISST. Objectives of the meta-evaluation. Framework for meta-evaluation. Parameters: gender and equity sensitivity. Rating system each evaluation. Fully met 2. Meta scores.

dard
Télécharger la présentation

Lessons from the meta-evaluation of MGNREGA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lessons from the meta-evaluation of MGNREGA Ranjani.K.Murthy Engendering Policy through Evaluation Project- ISST

  2. Objectives of the meta-evaluation

  3. Framework for meta-evaluation

  4. Parameters: gender and equity sensitivity

  5. Rating system each evaluation Fully met 2

  6. Meta scores Approaches

  7. Scope • Professional Institute Network Studies: 21 • Concurrent Evaluation of MGNREGA: 1 • Total: 22

  8. MGNREGA Act, 2005 Provide for the enhancement of the livelihood security of the households One hundred days of wage employment in every year to every household whose adult member volunteers for unskilled work Minimum and equal wages; at-least 33% women; <less than 5 km; conditional creches

  9. Subsequent orders/recommendations gender and social equity 33% for SC/ST/OBCs Land and irrigation development

  10. Fourth Edition of Guidelines, 2013 Empowerment of the socially disadvantaged, especially women, Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Schedules Tribes (STs), through the processes of a rights-based legislation (one of 7 goals)

  11. Evaluation preparation – Score 1

  12. Evaluation methodology (1.22)

  13. Evaluation methodology

  14. Evaluation report and use

  15. Assessment of impact on women's empowerment and gender equality by 12 PIN studies (1.08)

  16. Reasons

  17. Meta-score: 1.15 (prep 1.22, method: 1.22, report & use: 1.02, impact, 1.08)

  18. Recommendations: Substantive Equality

  19. Put substantive equality and marginalised women’s empowerment at the center Combine MGNREGS with other progs. e.g women’s land/resource rights

More Related