1 / 11

MUCOOL Collaboration Meeting February 2002

MUCOOL Collaboration Meeting February 2002. Steve Geer February 2002. WELCOME to the MUCOOL & MICE MEETINGS. The emergence of MICE has an impact on the mission of MUCOOL. EXISTING MUCOOL MISSION STATEMENT

darena
Télécharger la présentation

MUCOOL Collaboration Meeting February 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MUCOOL Collaboration MeetingFebruary 2002 Steve Geer February 2002

  2. WELCOMEto theMUCOOL&MICEMEETINGS Steve Geer

  3. The emergence of MICE has an impact on the mission of MUCOOL EXISTING MUCOOL MISSION STATEMENT Design, prototype, & bench-test all cooling channel components & eventually test a cooling section in a muon beam DRAFT REVISED MUCOOL MISSION STATEMENT Design, prototype, & bench-test all cooling channel components & make an engineering beam-test of a cooling section Steve Geer

  4. MUCOOL Institutions 16 Institutions from US, Europe, and Japan RF Development ANL FNAL IIT LBNL NWU (?) Univ. Mississippi Absorber R&D FNAL IIT KEK NIU UIUC Univ. Mississippi Univ. Osaka Univ. Oxford Cooling Experiment ANL BNL FNAL IIT LBNL Princeton UCLA UIUC Univ. Mississippi Univ. Indiana Beam Diagnostics ANL FNAL IIT Univ. Chicago Solenoids LBNL Steve Geer

  5. MUCOOL Organization Spokesman: Steve Geer BNL Contact: Rick Fernow LBNL Contact: Bob Rimmer http://www.fnal.gov/projects/muon_collider/cool/cool.html R&D Co-ordinators RF: A. Moretti, R. Rimmer Absorbers: D. Kaplan Lab G Instrumentation Tests: N. Solomey MUCOOL Test Area: M. Popovic MUCOOL Test Area Instrumentation: D. Errede Solenoids: Coming Soon Steve Geer

  6. Some MUCOOL Accomplishments Liq. H RF Liq. H RF Liq. H Steve Geer

  7. The MUTAC Report Says: “Ionization cooling remains the primary R&D issue for the collaboration. The most difficult part is the develop-ment and integration of the hardware, which is the goal of the MUCOOL efforts.” Steve Geer

  8. Why is MUCOOL so Challenging ? We need to be able to operate a system in which Liquid Hydrogen is separated by a baking foil from an ignition source containing the energy of 10,000 light bulbs, and all of this is within a system of SC solenoids that might quench from time-to-time. The system must operate as 1012 charged particles pass, & WE NEED TO GET SAFETY APPROVAL. We need to understand high gradient NCRF Cavity operationin Multi-Tesla magnetic fields, going well beyond the current state-of-the-art. We must understand and solve our present cavity breakdown problems. Steve Geer

  9. Status in December 2002 ? 201 MHz Cavity Designed 805 MHz R&D Ongoing 201 MHz Cavity Construction Begun ? Cavity Solenoid Design Begun ? 805 MHz and/or 201 MHz test system installation about to begin ? Absorber filling systems installation about to begin First Absorber Test Setup Designed – Safety Process Advanced Steve Geer

  10. Long-Range MUCOOL Schedule Depends on funding levels, but it is useful to have a plausible Strawman plan: Plan 1 – Test Capability Milestones Complete Test Area Construction DEC 02Complete LH2 Filling Systems JUN 03Complete 805 MHz Test Systems JUN 03Complete 201 MHz Test Systems SEP 04Complete Solenoid SEP 05Complete Beam Installation SEP 05Full Test Capability DEC 05 Steve Geer

  11. WE HAVE LOTS OFRESULTS & PLANSTO DISCUSS Steve Geer

More Related