1 / 59

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy. Review and Overview. “Imaging Chain” includes these elements: energy source object collector detector (or sensor) processor display analysis storage (if any). Optical Imaging Chain. 1: source. 5: processing. 6: display 7: analysis.

Télécharger la présentation

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

  2. Review and Overview “Imaging Chain” includes these elements: • energy source • object • collector • detector (or sensor) • processor • display • analysis • storage (if any)

  3. Optical Imaging Chain 1: source 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis 3: collector 4: sensor 2: object

  4. Source and/or Object • In astronomy, the source of energy (1) and the object (2) are almost always one and the same! • i.e., The object emits the light • Examples: • Galaxies • Stars • Exceptions: • Planets and the moon • Dust and gas that reflects or absorbs starlight

  5. Optical Imaging Chain in Astronomy 5: processing 1: source 2: object or 6: display 7: analysis 3: collector 4: sensor 8: storage

  6. 3,4 5 6,7 Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Astronomy 1,2

  7. Specific Requirements for Astronomical Imaging Systems • Requirements always conflict • Always want more than you can have • must “trade off” desirable attributes • Deciding the relative merits is a difficult task • “general-purpose” instruments (cameras) may not be sufficient • Want simultaneously to have: • excellent angular resolution AND wide field of view • high sensitivity AND wide dynamic range • Dynamic range is the ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources • broad wavelength coverage AND ability to measure narrow spectral lines

  8. Angular Resolution vs. Field of View • Angular Resolution: ability to distinguish sources that are separated by small angles • Limited by: • Optical Diffraction • Sensor Resolution • Field of View: angular size of the image field • Limited by: • Optics • Sensor Size (area)

  9. Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range • Sensitivity • ability to measure faint brightnesses • Dynamic Range • ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources in same system

  10. Wavelength Coverage vs. Spectral Resolution • Wavelength Coverage • Ability to image over a wide range of wavelengths • Limited by: • Spectral Transmission of Optics (Glass cuts off UV, far IR) • Spectral Resolution • Ability to detect and measure narrow spectral lines • Limited by: • “Spectrometer” Resolution (number of lines in diffraction grating)

  11. Optical Collector (Link #3)

  12. Lenses collect light BIG disadvantages Chromatic Aberrations (due to dispersion of glass) Lenses are HEAVY and supported only on periphery Limits the Lens Diameter Largest is 40" at Yerkes Observatory, Wisconsin Optical Collection (Link #3): Refracting Telescopes http://astro.uchicago.edu/vtour/40inch/kyle3.jpg

  13. Mirrors collect light Chromatic Aberrations eliminated Fabrication techniques continue to improve Mirrors may be supported from behind  Mirrors may be made much larger than refractive lenses Optical Collection (Link #3): Reflecting Telescopes

  14. Concave parabolic primary mirror to collect light from source modern mirrors for large telescopes are thin, lightweight & deformable, to optimize image quality Optical Reflecting Telescopes 3.5 meter WIYN telescope mirror, Kitt Peak, Arizona

  15. Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors • Light weight Easier to point • “light-duty” mechanical systems  cheaper • Thin Glass  Less “Thermal Mass” • Reaches Equilibrium (“cools down” to ambient temperature) quicker

  16. Hale 200" TelescopePalomar Mountain, CA http://www.cmog.org/page.cfm?page=374 http://www.astro.caltech.edu/observatories/palomar/overview.html

  17. 200" mirror (5 meters)for Hale Telescope • Monolith (one piece) • Several feet thick • 10 months to cool • 7.5 years to grind • Mirror weighs 20 tons • Telescope weighs 400 tons • “Equatorial” Mount • follows sky with one motion

  18. Keck telescopes, Mauna Kea, HI http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/geninfo/about.html

  19. 400" mirror (10 meters)for Keck Telescope • 36 segments • 3" thick • Each segment weighs 400 kg (880 pounds) • Total weight of mirror is 14,400 kg (< 15 tons) • Telescope weighs 270 tons • “Alt-azimuth” mount (left-right, up-down motion) • follows sky with two motions + rotation

  20. Prime focus: light focused by primary mirror alone Newtonian: use flat, diagonal secondary mirror to deflect light out side of tube Cassegrain: use convex secondary mirror to reflect light back through hole in primary Nasmyth (or Coudé) focus (coudé  French for “bend” or “elbow”): uses a tertiary mirror to redirect light to external instruments (e.g., a spectrograph) Basic Designs of Optical Reflecting Telescopes

  21. Prime Focus f Sensor Mirror diameter must be large to ensure that obstruction is not significant

  22. Newtonian Reflector Sensor

  23. Cassegrain Telescope Sensor Secondary Convex Mirror

  24. Feature of Cassegrain Telescope • Long Focal Length in Short Tube f Location of Equivalent Thin Lens

  25. Coudé or Nasmyth Telescope Sensor

  26. Optical Reflecting Telescopes Schematic of 10-meter Keck telescope (segmented mirror)

  27. Telescopes with largest diameters (in use or under construction: 10-meter Keck (Mauna Kea, Hawaii) 8-meter Subaru (Mauna Kea) 8-meter Gemini (twin telescopes: Mauna Kea & Cerro Pachon, Chile) 6.5-meter Mt. Hopkins (Arizona) 5-meter Mt. Palomar (California) 4-meter NOAO (Kitt Peak, AZ & Cerro Tololo, Chile) http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/billa/bigeyes.html Large Optical Telescopes Keck telescope mirror (note person) Summit of Mauna Kea, with Maui in background

  28. Why Build Large Telescopes? • Larger Aperture  Gathers MORE Light • Light-Gathering Power  Area • Area of Circular Aperture = D2 / 4 D2 • D = diameter of primary collecting element • Larger aperture  better angular resolution • recall that:

  29. Why Build Small Telescopes? • Smaller aperture  collects less light •  less chance of saturation (“overexposure”) on bright sources • Smaller aperture  larger field of view (generally) • Determined by “F ratio” or “F#” f = focal length of collecting element D = diameter of aperture

  30. F Ratio: F# • F# describes the ability of the optic to “deflect” or “focus” light • Smaller F#  optic “deflects” light more than system with larger F# Small F# Large F#

  31. F# of Large Telescopes • Hale 200" on Palomar: f/3.3 • focal length of primary mirror is: 3.3  200" = 660" = 55'  16.8 m • Dome must be large enough to enclose • Keck 10-m on Mauna Kea: f/1.75 • focal length of primary mirror is: 1.75  10m = 17.5 m  58 m

  32. F Ratio: F# • Two reflecting telescopes with different F# and same detector have different “Fields of View”: large  small  Small F# Large F#

  33. Sensors (Link #4)

  34. Astronomical CamerasUsually Include: • Spectral Filters • most experiments require specific wavelength range(s) • broad-band or narrow-band • “Reimaging” Optics • enlarge or reduce image formed by primary collecting element • Light-Sensitive Detector: Sensor

  35. Astronomical Sensors • Most common detectors: • Human Eye • Photographic Emulsion • film • plates • Electronic Sensors • CCDs

  36. Angular Resolution • Fundamental Limit due to Diffraction in “Optical Collector” (Link #3) • But Also Limited by Resolution of Sensor!

  37. Charge-Coupled Devices (CCDs) • Standard light detection medium for BOTH professional and amateur astronomical imaging systems • Significant decrease in price • numerous advantages over film: • high quantum efficiency (QE) • meaning most of the photons incident on CCD are “counted” • linear response • measured signal is proportional to number of photons collected • fast processing turnaround (CCD readout speeds ~1 sec) • NO development of emulsion! • regular grid of sensor elements (pixels) • as opposed to random distribution of AgX grains • image delivered in computer-ready form

  38. CCD Basics • Light-sensitive electronic element based on crystalline silicon • crystal = “lattice” of atoms at regular spacings • acts as though electrons have two states: • “bound” to atom • “free” to roam through lattice

  39. Energy Electrons in “Free” States (“conduction band”) photon Electrons in “Bound” States (“valance band”) CCD Basics • Incident photon adds energy to electron to “kick” it up into the “free” states • energy of photon must be sufficiently large for electron to “reach” the free states • to be absorbed, the photon wavelength  must be less than maximum max  1100 nm (near infrared)

  40. CCD Basics • Silicon structure is divided into pixels • e- transferred and “counted” one pixel at a time http://www.byte.com/art/9510/img/505099d2.htm

  41. Sensor Resolution • Obvious for Electronic Sensors (e.g., CCDs) • Elements have finite size • Light is summed over area • of sensor element (“integrated”) • Light from two stars that falls on • same element is added together • stars cannot be distinguished • in image! x

  42. Same Effect in Photographic Emulsions • More difficult to quantify • Light-sensitive “grains” of silver • halide in the emulsion • Placed “randomly” in emulsion • “Random” sizes • “large” grains are more sensitive • (respond to few photons) • “small” grains produce better • resolution

  43. Photographic techniques:silver halide • Film • Emulsion on “flexible” substrate • Still used by amateurs using sensitive film • B&W and color • Special treatment to increase sensitivity • Photographic Plates • Emulsion on glass plates • Most common detector from earliest development of AgX techniques until CCDs in late 70’s

  44. Eye as Astronomical Detector • Eye includes its own lens • focuses light on retina ( “sensor”) • When used with a telescope, must add yet another lens • redirect rays from primary optic • make them parallel (“collimated”) • rays appear to come from “infinity” (infinite distance away) • reimaging is performed by “eyepiece”

  45. Without Eyepiece Eye with Telescope With Eyepiece Light entering eye is “collimated”

  46. Eye as Astronomical Detector • Point sources (stars) appear brighter to eye through telescope • Factor is • D is telescope diameter • P is diameter of eye pupil • Magnification should make light fill the eye pupil (“exit pupil”) • Extended sources (for example, nebulae) do not appear brighter through a telescope • Gain in light gathering power exactly compensated by image magnification, spreads light out over larger angle.

  47. Atmospheric Effects on Image • Large role in ground-based optical astronomy • scintillation modifies source angular size • twinkling of stars = “smearing” of point sources • extinction reduces light intensity • atmosphere scatters a small amount of light, especially at short (bluer) wavelengths • water vapor blocks specific wavelengths, especially near-IR • scattered light produces interfering “background” • astronomical images are never limited to light from source alone; always include “source” + “background sky” • “light pollution” worsens sky background

  48. Scattering • “Wavelength Dependent” • Depends on color of light • Long wavelengths are scattered “less”

  49. Scattering by Molecules • Molecules are SMALL • “Blue” light is scattered MUCH more than red light • Reason for BOTH • blue sky (blue light scattered from sun in all directions) • red sunset (blue light is scattered out of the sun’s direct rays)

  50. Scattering by Dust • Dust particles are MUCH larger than molecules • e.g., from volcanos, dust storms • Blue light is scattered by dust “somewhat more” than red light

More Related