1 / 13

Writing a Fundable NIH K-Series Application

Join our workshop to learn how to write a successful NIH K-Series application. Get guidance on career development, review criteria, resources, and best practices. Hear from a recent K Award recipient.

davisbarbara
Télécharger la présentation

Writing a Fundable NIH K-Series Application

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Writing a Fundable NIH K-Series Application a workshop funded by USC Center for Excellence in Research with support from the Department of Pediatrics Faculty Development Program and SC CTSI Program

  2. Workshop Goals To provide background information on career development (K) awards To describe resources and programs available to junior faculty and senior trainees preparing to submit their first K applications To discuss the review criteria, expectations, and best practices for K applications To present the SC CTSI Mock Review Program To hear from a recent K Award recipient

  3. Workshop Participants Elizabeth Zelinski Rita & Edward Polusky Chair in Education and Aging Member, NIH NIA-S K-Award Study Section Michele Kipke Vice Chair of Research Department of Pediatrics Co-Director SC CTSI

  4. Workshop Participants David Hellard Senior Program Manager SC CTSI Research Development Program Jon Detterich Assistant Professor of Cardiology Department of Pediatrics Current K23 Awardee

  5. NIH K Awards KO1 – Mentored Research Scientist Development Award K02 – Independent Scientist Award K05 – Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention K07 – Academic Career Award K08 – Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Dev Award K12 – Institutional Career Development Awards K22 – Career Transition Awards K23 – Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Dev Award K24 – Midcareer Investigator Award – Patient Oriented K25 – Mentored Quantitative Research Dev Award K99/R00 – Pathway of independence Award KL2 – CTSI Career Development Award

  6. NIH K Awards KO1 – Mentored Research Scientist Development Award K02 – Independent Scientist Award K05 – Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention K07 – Academic Career Award K08 – Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Dev Award K12 – Institutional Career Development Awards K22 – Career Transition Awards K23 – Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Dev Award K24 – Midcareer Investigator Award – Patient Oriented K25 – Mentored Quantitative Research Dev Award K99/R00 – Pathway of independence Award KL2 – CTSI Career Development Award

  7. Current K Awards at USC/CHLA KO1 – Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (8) Provides 3 to 5 years of support for a mentored research training experience in the biomedical, behavioral, or clinical sciences Eligibility: Those with a research or health professional doctorate

  8. Current K Awards at USC/CHLA KO8 – Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (7) Provides support and protected time for a supervised research career development experience in the fields of biomedical and behavioral research Eligibility: Those with a clinical doctorate

  9. Current K Awards at USC/CHLA K23 – Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (8) Provides support and protected time for a mentored research training experience in patient-oriented research Eligibility: Those with a health professional doctorate

  10. 2013 NIH K-Award Success Rate

  11. Impact of K Awards  K08 & K23 awardees had significantly higher rates of receiving subsequent NIH research awards than a matched group of unfunded applicants  K awards appeared to have the greatest impact on the subsequent NIH research involvement of MD recipients, followed by MD/PhD recipients, and then PhD recipients http://grants.nih.gov/training/K_Awards_Evaluation_FinalReport_20110901.pdf

  12. Resources Center for Excellence in Research (CER) http://www.usc.edu/research/about/vp/cer/ NIH K-Kiosk information NIH career development awards http://grants.nih.gov/training/careerdevelopmentawards.htm

  13. Some questions to be thinking about What is the intent of the mentored K award? How is a K application different from an R application? What does a career development training plan look like? What is the candidate evaluated on? What qualifications should the designated mentors have? What should be included in a mentor’s statement? What are application strategies that work? What are common mistakes to avoid? What are reviewers looking for? What does a competitive K award application look like?

More Related