1 / 12

Side airbag TWG Meeting on October 25. 2001

Side airbag OOP study. Side airbag TWG Meeting on October 25. 2001. Honda R&D. Outline. Airbag philosophy and OOP test status. OOP test procedure study. Airbag philosophy and OOP test status. Side Effect. Occupant Protection. Balance. Frontal airbag system. Side airbag system.

dawn
Télécharger la présentation

Side airbag TWG Meeting on October 25. 2001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Side airbag OOP study Side airbag TWG Meeting on October 25. 2001 Honda R&D

  2. Outline • Airbag philosophy and OOP test status. • OOP test procedure study.

  3. Airbag philosophy and OOP test status Side Effect Occupant Protection Balance Frontal airbag system Side airbag system • Top mount airbag • De-power inflator • Folding for quick deployment • Material • Shape • Seat mount airbag • De-power inflator • Folding for a performance to go into narrow space • Seat tear line structure for de-power inflator Multi stage inflator Occupant Posture Detecting System Crash severity i-SRS i-side airbag system

  4. Airbag philosophy and OOP test status • Support Side airbag TWG orientation(contribution). • Challenging High-performance airbag system research and development. • Applying side airbag system with OPDS. • Possibility be met TWG OOP recommendation. (Canadian MOU)

  5. 3.3.2.1 3.3.2.2 3.3.2.3 3.3.2.4 3.3.2.5 3.3.2.6 3.3.2.7 OOP test procedure study 3.3.2 Test for seat-mounted system

  6. A B C D OOP test procedure study Injury severity HY3 C3Y on Booster seat 3.3.2.1 position is most important in our airbag system. A (TWG3.2.2.1)<B<C<D Studied using prototype side airbags based on NHTSA's proposal. a) Dummy setting problems b) Neck injury mechanism

  7. OOP test procedure study To study injury variation of relative location between A/B module and C3Y Dummy head. Case 1. Airbag module height position in seat Case 2. Dummy height position along the seat surface

  8. B B 110mm A 120mm OOP test procedure study Case 1. Airbag module height position in seat A Position A＝Reference to TWG procedure Dummy head contacts seat surface Position B＝Move module 120mm upward Reference to TWG procedure Head behind clearance increases 0(A) to 110mm(B)

  9. Comparison the injury criteria of 2 positions Neck Tension Nij A B A B OOP test procedure study Case 1. Airbag module height position in seat A B Contact 110mm

  10. OOP test procedure study Case 2. Dummy height position with head contacting the seat surface 50mm 0 50mm

  11. Comparison injury criteria of 3 positions Nij Neck Tension The phenomenon showed that the injury criteria reduced in the case of air bag struck dummy shoulder area.( See.C) A C D A C D A C D 50mm Down Original position 50mm Up OOP test procedure study

  12. OOP test procedure study Test results • Test result deviations related to the setting procedure are found. • Distance between head and airbag module is affected by airbag module height within the seat. • Dummy (C3Y) neck injury criteria is very sensitive to distance between airbag module and head.

More Related