1 / 8

Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu V. United States. Landmark supreme court case By Abi & Drayton (sort of). The essential question. Did the President and congress go beyond their war powers by implementing exclusion and restricting the rights of Americans of Japanese descent?.

dawnar
Télécharger la présentation

Korematsu V. United States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Korematsu V. United States Landmark supreme court case By Abi & Drayton(sort of)

  2. The essential question • Did the President and congress go beyond their war powers by implementing exclusion and restricting the rights of Americans of Japanese descent? https://www.thoughtco.com/franklin-roosevelt-32nd-president-united-states-104645 http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Fred_Korematsu/

  3. Case background information • During the Japanese American war, the President signed Executive order 9066, which allowed military authorities to enact curfews. It also forced Japanese – Americans to sell their homes and belongings and move to internment camps. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese- American and U.S. Citizen, had facial surgery and pretended to be Mexican- American but got arrested for violating an order that banned people of Japanese descent from the area of San Leandro, California. http://landmarkcases.org/en/landmark/cases/korematsu_v_united_states

  4. What constitutional principles are related to this case? • Amendment 14- the right to equal protection https://www.federalobserver.com/2016/08/02/the-14th-amendment-does-not-grant-citizenship-to-foreigners-born-in-the-u-s/ http://littlegreenfootballs.com/page/318064_14TH_AMENDMENT_CHALLENGES-_Imm

  5. How did the Court answer the essential question? • The court vote was 6:3 in favor of the United States. They came to the conclusion saying that without the Japanese- Americans in internment camps, the public would be in danger. They also stated that normally forcing citizens to sell their homes is an impermissible use of government power, there is and exception when there is grave danger to public safety. https://history.howstuffworks.com/history-vs-myth/japanese-internment-camp.htm

  6. Why is this considered a landmark case? WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THIS CASE ON SOCIETY? • This impacted Japanese- Americans at the time because they had to sell their possessions and move to internment camps. • This is a landmark case because it was about equal protection and if the government was allowed to put all of the Japanese- Americans in internment camps during world war II https://www.change.org/p/supreme-court-of-the-united-states-overturn-korematsu-v-united-states-ruling

  7. Bibliography • http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-korematsu-v-us • https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/323us214 • http://landmarkcases.org/en/landmark/cases/korematsu_v_united_states • http://landmarkcases.org/en/landmark/cases/korematsu_v_united_states#Tab=Background • http://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/6/Korematsu-v-United-States

  8. The End!!!!!

More Related