1 / 11

Comprehensive Assessment of Long Jump Events in Track and Field by Olga Glotova

This document outlines the assessment process for long jump events in track and field, designed by Olga Glotova. It details the purpose of the test, which includes a half-standard approach to long jump through a series of lead-up steps. Each student is allowed three attempts, graded on various components, each worth ten points, with the best attempt counted for their grade. The document also addresses challenges faced during testing, including time constraints, class management issues, and equipment placement, along with suggested improvements.

dean
Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Assessment of Long Jump Events in Track and Field by Olga Glotova

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Assessment Track and field Jumping events Long Jump by Olga Glotova

    2. How did it look

    3. Process Test Purpose: The purpose of this test is to employ four main steps of long jump and perform it using a half of standard approach (lead-up steps). Scoring Procedures: Each student will have three attempts. The students will be graded on the process of the scoring for each component of long jump listed below. Each component is worth of 10 points. The best attempt is assessing for the grade.

    4. Process Test

    5. Product Test Scoring Procedures: Each student has three attempts to perform the best result. Each attempt worth of certain points listed below. When a student is finished being tested, the student will go get another student from the practice area and send this student to the testing area.

    6. Product Test

    7. Process Results

    8. Product Results

    9. Overall results

    10. Test Problems

    11. Test Problems Test itself: The test was too long (not suitable for large classes) Could change the process elements/points Class management: Testing area and practicing area were too far from each other. Equipment: Take off board was too far from the sand pit (need age appropriate adjustment )

    12. Questions?

More Related