1 / 10

Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions

Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions. (Halfway through Unit 5 in AP Statistics). Hypothesis Proving ?  bad word. Hypothesis = Conjecture we assume is true Data consistent w H  Fail to Reject H (support, retain) Data inconsistent w H  Reject H

deborah
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions (Halfway through Unit 5 in AP Statistics)

  2. Hypothesis Proving? bad word • Hypothesis = Conjecture we assume is true • Data consistent w H Fail to Reject H (support, retain) • Data inconsistent w H  Reject H What is consistent enough? Use Probability (P-value)! P-value high  Fail to reject H P-value low  Reject H Careful! We are still inferring. We can not be certain.

  3. Hypotheses TypesNote: Hs get written BEFORE the study is performed! No design bias! • Null Hypothesis = H0 • Assume this is true when you begin study • “Ordinary state of affairs” • Specify parameter and its value • H0 : parameter = hypothesized value • Helps us define a null model to use for evaluating data • Alternative Hypothesis = Ha • “Unusual” state of affairs – what you’d like to show is true • Same parameter, diff value (often a range) • Ha : parameter < hypothesized value

  4. Z-tests (t-tests later) • Sampling distribution models for proportions  P-values • Using this Normal model (check your conditions!), when we calc P, we call this a one-proportion z-test. • Normal model for proportions requires conditions • 1. • 2. • 3. • Z-test requires conditions from one-proportion z-interval. • 1. • 2. • 3. • 4. How are these lists different? Do I need to check for 7 things? NO!

  5. Example • Claim: SproutIt improves germination. Know that Nwater(0.67, 0.047). • H0 : pSproutIt = 0.67 • Ha : pSproutIt > 0.67 • Note: This is a one-sided alternative; we are interested in the P of data being on one side of the null model. • Study: 100 seeds with SproutIt applied in water per box directions (in the same way prior studies with water were conducted). Completely random study. 70 seeds sprout. Assuming H0, what is P of seeing this proportion sprout? What is the P-value? How do we feel about rejecting or failing to reject Hs?

  6. Cut-Offs • Are results plausible given H0? • Some error is inevitable • Natural variation  should want to talk about SD • Chance • How unlikely or likely? • No set cut-off. It should be based on prior information about context in question.

  7. More practice 1. A research team wants to know if aspirin helps thin blood. H0 says it doesn’t. They test 12 patients, observe the proportion with thinner blood, and get a P-value of 0.32. They proclaim that aspirin doesn’t work. What do you say? (Hint: consider the null model and your assumptions) 2. An allergy drug has been tested and found to give relief to 75% of the patients in a large clinical trial. Now the scientists want to see if the new improved version works even better. What would the H0 be? 3. The new drug is tested and the P-value is 0.0001. What would you conclude about the new drug?

  8. Practice Answers 1. Note that n stinks – if aspirin doesn’t help, p = 0.5 and pn = 6, qn = 6. Can’t make a null model that follows 3 required conditions. Unable to reject null hypothesis. Even if study was designed with an adequate n, 32% of the time, there is some kind of blood change (unclear metrics and model), so we could advise the research team to use sound design principles to try again. 2. H0: proportion of patients experiencing relief =75% 3. Strong evidence against H0. Reject H0 and conclude that new drug gives relief to more than 75% of patients.

  9. Mashed potatoes or reconstituted potato flakes? (Taste test) • H0: proportion people liking reconst. Potato flakes = 0.5 • Ha: p ≠ 0.5 Note: This is a 2-sided alternative; p > 0.5 and p < 0.5 are included. Use 2P of one side. In a completely random study, 100 people tasted both and indicated what they preferred. • Name the null model. Proportion of people liking reconst. potato flakes was found to be 0.4. • Find P-value and write a conclusion. • Add a 95% CI for this study and state it in a sentence.

  10. TI Tips STAT TESTS 5: 1-Prop Ztest P0 enter H0’s proportion x enter observed number (not a proportion) n enter sample size use arrow keys to select correct Ha Try it for the prior study! What is x? What is p-value?

More Related