1 / 12

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing. HCAT Program Review Cocoa Beach, Fl December 2000. Sequence 1 - Make sure that HVOF does not cause embrittlement. ASTM F-519, Type 1a.2 75% NTS All experience shows HVOF does not cause embrittlement Just makes sure. Coat, no grind.

debra-spence
Télécharger la présentation

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing HCAT Program Review Cocoa Beach, Fl December 2000

  2. Sequence 1 - Make sure that HVOFdoes not cause embrittlement • ASTM F-519, Type 1a.2 • 75% NTS • All experience shows HVOF does not cause embrittlement • Just makes sure Coat, no grind

  3. Sequence 2 - can H from other plating or stripping escape through HVOF? • 75% NTS • Using bright Cd so as to avoid excessive diameter and inability to hold in grips • No way for H to escape at center except through HVOF 1. Bright Cd plate 2. Strip center - no bake H2 fill 3. Coat within 4 hrs, no grind Does H2 escape?

  4. Sequence 3 - How does environmental embrittlement compare with Cr? • 45% NTS • Solutions - H2O and 5% NaCl • Exposed notch should corrode and release H Coat Expose small area in notch expose

  5. Exposure of bare surface for Sequence 3 • Exposure of notch - 90 sector • CNC machine using rounded edge blade (RBK, Seattle) Blade Sample

  6. Hydrogen embrittlement • Samples produced by Southwest Aeroservice (Jim Nuse, Dave Sommerville) • Sequences 1 and 2 work by Metcut (Phil Bretz) • Sequence 3 by Boeing (Dennis Dull)

  7. Base material • Expected NTS 260 ksi • Tested at 362,416 to 382,521, average = 373,600 ksi • Sequence 1 and 2 testing at 280.2 ksi • Rockwell hardness

  8. Chrome penetrates into notch thinner at notch bottom HVOF deposits best by angling gun and blowing excess powder away with strong jet thicker at bottom 93.5m 3.68 mils 93.5m 3.68 mils 243.1m 9.57 mils Coating deposition Chrome HVOF 31

  9. Table shows hours to failure (pass>200) Sequence 1 Col 3 currently under test originals not baked Sequence 2 Uncoated samples currently under test - no baseline yet originals not H-loaded Sequence 3 testing begun - uncoated baseline in test Blue samples at Boeing for metallography Embrittlement - summary

  10. Sequence 1 UnbakedSeq 1 show HVOF does not cause embrittlement Baked baseline (0.003” and 0.010” Cr only) currently under test Two Cr samples at Boeing for metallography to check failure mode Embrittlement - Sequence 1, not baked

  11. No immediate failures Need to acquire uncoated baseline Baking removes most H2 Not completely removed in WC-Co One immediate failure WC-CoCr 0.010” Being analyzed at Boeing Embrittlement - Sequence 2, not baked

  12. Sequence 1 HVOF does not cause embrittlement Baked chrome baseline being acquired Sequence 3 In progress Sequence 2 Failure not immediate without bake Need baseline comparison Some H2 removal by flame? Reduced Kt? Bake removes H2 from most samples Except WC-Co 0.003 - why? Immediate fail WC-Co 0.010” being examined at Boeing Baseline uncoated (i.e. coated and stripped) being acquired Embrittlement - Conclusions

More Related