1 / 66

Modern Physics

Modern Physics. Waves and Optics Special relativity Quantum mechanics Wave, particles, and weirdness Atoms, molecules, and nuclei Particle physics General relativity and Cosmology Revolutions in other fields. Prof. Rick Trebino Georgia Tech www.physics.gatech.edu/frog/lectures.

demi
Télécharger la présentation

Modern Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modern Physics Waves and Optics Special relativity Quantum mechanics Wave, particles, and weirdness Atoms, molecules, and nuclei Particle physics General relativity and Cosmology Revolutions in other fields Prof. Rick Trebino Georgia Tech www.physics.gatech.edu/frog/lectures

  2. Modern Physics is 20th century physics. By 1900, physicists thought they had it all together. They had Physics I and II (“classical physics”) down and thought that that was about it. All that remained was to dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Scanning-tunneling microscope image of individual atoms Man, were they in for a surprise! Several of them actually. Modern physics is the story of these surprises (quantum mechanics and special and general relativity), surprises—revolutions, actually—that have changed the world beyond all recognition. The purpose of this course is to introduce you to all this fun new stuff.

  3. The Beginnings of Modern Physics • These new discoveries and the many resulting complications required a massive revision of fundamental physical assumptions and theories. • The introduction (~1905) of the modern theories of special relativity and quantum mechanics became the starting point of this most fascinating revision. General relativity (~1915) continued it. c Special relativity Speed General relativity Quantum mechanics 19th-century physics 0 0 Huge Size

  4. In 1900, it was well-known that the universe contained only particles. Waves, on the other hand, were simply collective motions of particles—a much less fundamental phenomenon. A human wave

  5. We’ll begin our story with the age-old subjects of waves and optics, which hold the key to it all. “I procured me a triangular glass prism to try therewith the celebrated phenomena of colours.” Isaac Newton, 1665 Isaac Newton (1642-1727) Is light a particle or a wave? After remaining ambivalent for many years, Newton concluded that light was made up of particles.

  6. While particles travel in straight lines, waves bend around corners. Ocean waves passing through wave-breaks in Tel Aviv, Israel. This is diffraction, and it occurs for all types of waves.

  7. Light passing through a square hole bends around the edges. Thomas Young (1773-1829) Light pattern after passing through a small square hole In 1803, Thomas Young showed that light diffracted precisely as predicted by Fresnel’s wave theory.

  8. where is the electric field, is the magnetic field, and c is the velocity of light. In the mid-19th century, Maxwell unified electricity and magnetism into a single force with his now famous equations. In free space: James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879)

  9. y x Electric field (E) Magnetic field (B) Wavelength (l) z In addition, Maxwell showed that light is an electromagnetic wave. • The electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields are in phase. • And the electric field, the magnetic field, and the propagation direction are all perpendicular. Different wavelengths correspond to different colors, many of which we can’t see. And the frequency (w) of a wave is (2p times) the rate at which the peaks pass by.

  10. But exactly what was waving? • It seemed that electromagnetic waves could propagate through empty space! Indeed, precisely what was electromagnetically waving was unknown at the time. Scientists decided to call itaetherand figure out what it was later.

  11. Waves also interfere. The color you see is the one for which the light reflected from the front and back of the bubble surface are in phase. By the mid-19th century, light was well-known to be a wave.

  12. The Michelson Interferometer Input beam L2 • The Michelson Interferometer deliberately interferes two beams and so yields a sinusoidal output intensity vs. the difference in path lengths. Output beam Mirror L1 Beam- splitter Delay Mirror Output beam intensity vs. relative path length I l DL = 2(L2 – L1)

  13. Michelson & Morley • In 1887 Michelson and Morley attempted simply to measure the earth's velocity with respect to the aether and found it always to be zero—no matter which direction the earth was moving—effectively disproving the existence of the aether and providing a great crack in the foun-dations of physics. Albert Michelson (1852-1931) Edward Morley (1838-1923)

  14. In 1905, Einstein had a very good year. That year, Einstein explained Michelson’s and Morley’s experiment: he realized that light didn’t need a medium and was a property of free space. It’s a wave—but not collective motion of particles! And it has the odd property that it travels at the same velocity no matter what speed you’re going. This is Special Relativity. Oh, and he graduated from grad school that year, too. Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

  15. y y’ x z x’ z’ Before Special Relativity One frame moving at velocity v with respect to another Basically, this seems so obvious that we almost shouldn’t even have to say it. Unfortunately, it’s wrong.

  16. y y’ x z x’ z’ With Special Relativity The Lorentz transformations follow directly from the constant-speed-of-light assumption and are the correct way to transform from one frame to the other. They yield the speed of light is all frames and are NOT at all obvious! Lorentz himself didn’t believe them.

  17. Relativistic and Classical Kinetic Energies K = ½ mv2 You cannot exceed the speed of light. It’s the law. v/c You need an infinite amount of energy to go the speed of light…

  18. Measurements of time confirm Special Relativity • Two airplanes traveled east and west around Earth as it rotated. Atomic clocks on the airplanes were compared with similar clocks kept at the observatory to show that the moving clocks in the airplanes ran slower. In Special Relativity, time passes at a rate that depends on your velocity.

  19. Blackbody Radiation • When matter is heated, it not only absorbs light, but it also emits it. • A blackbody is a medium that’s black when it’s cool and so can absorb and emit all colors. Blackbodies are interesting because their emitted light spectra are independent of the material and depend only on their temperature.

  20. The Ultraviolet Catastrophe • In 1900, Lord Rayleigh used the classical theories of electromagnetism and thermodynamics to show that the blackbody spectrum should be: UV Visible IR Rayleigh-Jeans Formula This worked at longer wavelengths but deviated badly at short ones. This problem became known as the ultraviolet catastrophe and was one of many effects that classical physics couldn’t explain.

  21. Shortly afterward, Max Planck found that he could obtain the correct blackbody result if light was actually a particle. where h is a constant now known as Planck’s constant. But, of course, he didn’t really believe such a crazy idea. No one else did either. Max Planck(1858–1947)

  22. Photo-electric Effect: Classical Theory Illuminate a surface with light. Look at the electrons that emerge. Initial observations by Heinrich Hertz 1887 Classically, the kinetic energy (K) of the electrons should increase with the light intensity and not depend on the light frequency (w).

  23. a Electron kinetic energy K Light frequency w Photo-electric effect observations • The actual kinetic energy of the electrons is independent of the light intensity. • The kinetic energy of the electrons, for a given emitting material, actually depends only on the frequency of the light (w). • There was also a threshold frequency of the light, below which no electrons were ejected. No one had any idea how this could happen.

  24. In 1905, Einstein decided Planck wasn’t crazy. Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by requiring that light be composed of particles of energy ħw, where ħ = h/2π, and w is the frequency. Energy after = Energy before Electron kinetic energy Photon energy Electron potential energy to be overcome before escaping. So light is simultaneously a wave and a particle! We call light particles photons.

  25. Indeed, it’s now easy to see that light also behaves like a particle. • Photographs taken in dimmer light look grainier. Very very dim Very dim Dim Bright Very bright Very very bright When we detect very weak light, we find that it’s made up of particles—photons.

  26. 19th-century scientists also could not explain spectra. Wavelength

  27. The planetary model for the atom was also a problem. • From classical electromagnetic theory, an accelerated electric charge radiates energy (electromagnetic radiation), which means that its energy must decrease. So the radius of its orbit around the nucleus must decrease. Why doesn’t the electron crash into the nucleus?

  28. n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 Bohr’s quantization condition was a fix. • Bohr’s hydrogen-atom model assumed that the angular momentum of the electron is an integral multiple of ħ. Niels Bohr (1885-1962) The electron orbit could only have certain discrete radii, and it could make transitions between these “stationary states,” emitting or absorbing energy corresponding to the energy difference between the two states.

  29. Bohr’s model worked for the Hydrogen atom. It explained Hydrogen’s emission and absorption spectra. But it didn’t work for other atoms.

  30. Fourier decomposing functions plays a big role in physics. a1sin(t) • Here, we write a square wave as a sum of sine waves of different frequencies. a3sin(3t) Fourier developed the Fourier transform to model heat-flow problems. a5sin(5t) Joseph Fourier 1768 - 1830

  31. The Fourier transform is one of the most important equations in science. • It converts a function of time to one of frequency: and converting back uses almost the same formula: The spectrum of a wave is given by:

  32. w t w t w t F(w) f(t) The Uncertainty Principle is a simple classical property of the Fourier transform. Shortpulse Medium-lengthpulse If Dt is the width of a wave in time, and Dw is its spectral width, then: Longpulse This relation will play an important role in modern physics!

  33. If a light-wave also acted like a particle, why shouldn’t matter-particles also act like waves? • In his thesis in 1923, Prince Louis V. de Broglie suggested that mass particles should have wave properties similar to those of light. The wavelength of a matter wave is called the de Broglie wavelength: where h = Planck’s constant and p is the particle’s momentum. where E is the particle’s energy. They would also have frequency: And the mass particles would be subject to their own Uncertainty Principle!

  34. The Schrödinger Equation At about the same time, Schrödinger introduced his Wave Equation, which nicely explained atoms and their properties and is the fundamental equation of Quantum Mechanics. For a particle moving in a potential V in one dimension, it’s: Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961) And Y is called the particle’s wave function. where:

  35. What on earth is Y? The probability P(x) dx of a particle being between x and x + dxis given by the equation: The probability of the particle being between x1 and x2 is given by

  36. Y yields probability distribution functions The probability density for the hydrogen atom for three different electron states.

  37. Quantum theory explains the Periodic Table.

  38. Molecules and solids It’s far too difficult to solve the Schrödinger Equation for molecules and solids, so approximation methods must be used. Fortunately, some general ideas have emerged.

  39. Quantum mechanics is essential to understand semiconductors. Essentially all modern technology is a direct result of semiconductors and so is due to quantum mechanics. Economists estimate that quantum mechanics is responsible for ~80% of the entire US economy.

  40. Nuclear Physics The nucleus of an atom is made up of positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons. So there’s no negative charge! How can a nucleus hold together? The strong force!

  41. Nuclear Reactions Nuclear fission is the breaking apart of a heavy nucleus, which releases much energy. Nuclear fusion is the combining together of two light nuclei, which also releases much energy.

  42. Elementary Particle Physics But, if nuclei are made up of protons and neutrons, what are protons and neutrons made of? Physicists have discovered a zoo of elementary particles, including quarks of 1/3 the charge of a proton. A Feynman diagram indicating the exchange of a pion (Yukawa’s meson) between a neutron and a proton.

  43. While there were clearly some problems in 19th-century physics, everyone remained happy with Newton’s Law of Gravitation.Except Einstein. Einstein was also unsatisfied with his Theory of Special Relativity; it didn’t include acceleration. And because acceleration seemed similar to gravity, in 1915 he lost interest in the quantum mechanical revolution he had begun, and decided to pursue a geometrical theory of gravity, in which acceleration and gravity were equivalent.

  44. General Relativity and the Curvature of Space • Einstein considered the possibility that the effect of mass (i.e., gravity) was to curve space. • At the time, no one thought that this was a good idea. So if space-time is not flat, then the apparent straight line path of light will actually be curved.

  45. In a 1919 eclipse, light from a star was indeed bent by the sun, causing it to appear displaced. The verification of GR was a sensation. Einstein’s theory predicted a deflection of 1.75 seconds of arc, and two measurements found 1.98 ± 0.16 and 1.61 ± 0.40 seconds. Many more experiments, using starlight and radio waves from quasars, have confirmed Einstein’s predictions about the bending of light with increasing accuracy.

  46. Gravitational lensing by galaxies When light from a distant object like a quasar passes by a nearby galaxy on its way to us on Earth, the light can be bent multiple times as it passes in different directions around the galaxy. The Cosmic Horseshoe

  47. General Relativity also predicts Black Holes • While a star is burning, the heat and pressure produced by the thermonuclear reactions balance its gravity. When the star’s fuel is depleted, gravity dominates. The star’s mass can collapse into a black hole that warps space-time enough to not allow light to escape. A collapsing star greater than 3 solar masses will collapse to a black hole. Karl Schwarzschild determined the radius of a black hole and known as the event horizon.

  48. Closed Open Flat GR also describes the large-scale structure of the universe. The large-scale shape of the universe is determined by its density, r. W0≡r / rcrit where rcrit = is the critical density for which the universe is flat.

  49. The revolutions in physics inspired revolutions in other fields, too. Fields like chemistry, engineering, and biology necessarily also underwent revolutions because physics is their basis. And mathematics also began to see flaws in its fundamental foundations. And the revolutions in physics spurred revolutions in art, music, architecture, and psychology and even changed the way the average person saw the world. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)

  50. { } the empty set Weirdness in mathematics: Russell’s Paradox (1901) Consider a set that contains itself. Example: { , , … } { { }, } {{ }} the set containing the empty set and the set containing the empty set Next consider the set of all sets that contain themselves. Okay. Now consider the set of all sets that don’t contain themselves. Does this last set contain itself? If it doesn’t, then it does. But if it does, then it doesn’t. Because set theory is the basis of all mathematics (and numbers!), this fundamental paradox is a serious crack in the foundations of mathematics.

More Related