1 / 20

Partnerships and Quality: An HE Case Study

Partnerships and Quality: An HE Case Study. David Ball University Librarian Bournemouth University. Summary. Part 1: Partnerships The Dorset, South Somerset & South Wiltshire HE Partnership (DSW) DSW Peripatetic Training Support Librarian

denis
Télécharger la présentation

Partnerships and Quality: An HE Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Partnerships and Quality:An HE Case Study David Ball University Librarian Bournemouth University

  2. Summary • Part 1: Partnerships • The Dorset, South Somerset & South Wiltshire HE Partnership (DSW) • DSW Peripatetic Training Support Librarian • Part 2: Quality - Bournemouth University’s library evaluations

  3. Part 1: Partnerships The DSW Partners: Bournemouth & Poole College Bournemouth University Kingston Maurward College Salisbury College The Arts Institute at Bournemouth Weymouth College Yeovil College

  4. Rationale Collaboration to: widen and increase participation to HE ensure efficient provision of high quality programmes meet local, regional and national need for a better educated and skilled population

  5. A DSW Current Project HEFCE’s Restructuring & Collaboration Fund: stimulating & meeting identified demand for HE in DSW area Infrastructure funding of £1m+ over 3 years

  6. DSW Hybrid Library • Resources – Image Bank • e-resources • access • public libraries • ICT infrastructure - common LMS • Staff development and support - Peripatetic Training Support Librarian (PTSL)

  7. Why PTSL? - 1 • Bridging the HE/FE divide • Knowledge of HE resources and demands, and awareness of FE issues. • Training college library staff • Filling a skills gap left by time constraints, limited training opportunities, communication, staff turnover. • Sharing good practice • Many examples of good practice existed in the partner libraries, but there was a need for a mechanism for sharing.

  8. Why PTSL? - 2 • Improving communication • Improved communication between all partners would help to heighten understanding of library services for the HE students. • Promoting online resources and improving skills • Online resources were being underused, causing unsustainable pressure on print resources. • Developing resources • A coordinated approach to improving resources was lacking.

  9. Training – Library Staff • Accessible • Ongoing • Meeting individual needs • Group training in BU online resources • Individual training • Collaborating on student training sessions • Informal support • University Library staff awareness

  10. TrainingStudents & Academic Staff • Enabling library staff to deliver training • Hosting visits to BU Library • Participating in skills sessions • Advising on Athens registration • Reaching out to teaching staff

  11. Communication • Between the University & Partner Libraries, especially Subject Librarians • Between college libraries • Facilitating communication with academic staff and other key personnel • Representing combined library services • Planning library services for new courses • Helping to manage perception and expectation

  12. Why PTSL Has Worked • Investing time • One focus, one person • General issues - staff development • Common issues - access to public libraries • Established post, with wider remit

  13. Part 2Quality

  14. BU Library Evaluations • Every five years • Comprehensive - baseline for all QA • Checklist approach, based on LINC Health Panel Accreditation Working Group document, Sconul’s Aide-mémoire for assessors when evaluating library and computing services and Library Association’s Library & learning resources provision for franchised and other collaborative courses

  15. Library Evaluations/2 • Section 1 – Library Strategy, Planning and Liaison • Strategy • Quality, evaluation and feedback • Liaison • Legislation

  16. Library Evaluations/3 • Section 2 - Resources • Finance • Staffing • Accommodation and equipment • Section 3 – Learning Materials • Availability and relevance of learning resources • User support

  17. Library Evaluations/4 • 22 statements reflecting expectations about the service (e.g. ‘The library has a current quality assurance programme, which articulates the services to BU students’) • Suggested evidence (e.g. ‘Published policy. Service level agreements. Evidence of regular review. Contribution to external quality assessment procedures …’) • Boxes for comments from assessee and assessor, and for agreed actions

  18. Library Evaluations/5 • Second round shows: • significant improvements in all resources -staff, stock, accommodation • appropriate positions in organisational structures • good to excellent QA procedures • increasing HE-ness - appearance of separate HE budgets, of subject librarians

  19. Importance of Evaluations • Pervasion of quality culture • essential responsibility of HEIs • creation of HE infrastructure • Partnership Audits

  20. Events and Contacts Access and Identity - Challenges of Delivering HE Learning Resources in the FE Environment (February 2003 and 2004):http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/library/ The National DSW Conference, 18th October, UUK, London: warwick_karen@ntworld.com David Ball: dball@ bournemouth.ac.uk

More Related