1 / 9

DISCUSSION GROUP BELOW THE KNEE Tues/4/26/05 – First Meeting Attendance: Folks associated with

DISCUSSION GROUP BELOW THE KNEE Tues/4/26/05 – First Meeting Attendance: Folks associated with ground arrays balloon measurement (active and passive) space-based measurements. R. Streitmatter. Discussion centered on What measurements would be most useful?

Télécharger la présentation

DISCUSSION GROUP BELOW THE KNEE Tues/4/26/05 – First Meeting Attendance: Folks associated with

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DISCUSSION GROUP • BELOW THE KNEE • Tues/4/26/05 – First Meeting • Attendance: Folks associated with • ground arrays • balloon measurement (active and passive) • space-based measurements R. Streitmatter

  2. Discussion centered on • What measurements would be most useful? • What techniques would be most appropriate? • What modalities (balloon or space) are right for which measurements? • Most useful to which end? • UNDERSTANDING THE KNEE • Dominant, obvious feature in the all-particle spectrum • Presumably carries with it broader understanding of CR

  3. DIRECT MEASUREMENT • Direct measurements to understand knee from data • Direct measurements to help • EAS people attain coherence • e.g. KASCADE, Tibet • Balloon measurements attain coherence, • e.g. RUNJOB. JACEE

  4. WHAT Direct Measurements? • IDEALLY, Direct all-element energy spectra • To energy ≈ 1015eV • Include • Observable (?) bend in (at least) proton spectrum • B/C ratios to “exhaustion” • NOT REALISTIC • FACTOID: In the foreseeable future (≈ 20 years) NO balloon measurements or space-based measurements are going to be able to observe the bend in the proton spectrum above ≈ 1014 • Simple question of exposure, dictated by mass and time of flight: Subject to statistical quibble, invention of new technique.

  5. Remedial Slide on Detector Characteristics • TRD • • Useful for ≈ Z > 5. • Can’t do protons, helium • • Can be pushed to Lorentz factor ≈ 105 • • --> Emax, carbon ≈ 1015 eV • --> Emax, Fe ≈ 5 x 1015 eV • “Light” --> large geometry factor • Calorimeter • Can measure Z > 1, i.e. protons, helium, iron • “Heavy” • --> lesser geometry factor • Can’t do total absorption, --> “thin calorimeters” • Question of interaction physics change at higher energy • Need for calibration and simulation of response

  6. So what (direct) measurements are both • useful and can be done? (1) • B/C • Can be done by TRD or Cal, but TRD will have, for given mass, ≈ 5-10 x exposure • Best done in space with no atmospheric overburden • At what energy does atmospheric background overwhelm a balloon measurement? -- where errors in corrections exceed signal . (Check #)

  7. So what (direct) measurements are both • useful and can be done? (2) • Measure individual element spectra to as high energy as feasible • Provide composition “foundation” for EAS work • What is minimum requirement of EAS folks • “Everything helps” : We need a better answer

  8. So what (direct) measurements are both • useful and can be done? (2)-continued • Would it make sense to • Measure “lights” and “heavies” with entirely separate experiments? • Measure heavies and all-particle, obtain lights by subtraction?

  9. Extended discussion of instrumental limitations • To be continued • Electrons, positrons, antiprotons, isotopes and ultraheavies • not mentioned yet, but they will be.

More Related