Quality and Equity Issues Related to the Integration of Immigrant Students in Education. Petra Stanat Institute for Educational Quality Improvement (IQB) at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Immigrant students , education , success. Outline.
01 / 64Quality and Equity Issues Related to the Integration of Immigrant Students in Education
1 / 17
Télécharger la présentation
Quality and Equity Issues Related to the Integration of Immigrant Students in Education
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
Outline Background: Multilevel perspective on immigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess School successofimmigrantstudents in Australia: Evidencefrom PISA Potential determinants/correlatesofimmigrantstudents‘ achievement: Cultural identityorientations Compositionofthestudentbody in classrooms Language useandproficiency Controversial open question: Roleof L1?
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g.,immigration policies, shared attitudes towards immigration Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., tracking, educational standards, monitoring Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudentseducationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., school types as differential learning environments Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., segregation, socio-structural environment, after-school programs Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., composition of student body, school & classroom climate Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., immigration background, stereotypes, differential expectations Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., economical, cultural, social capital; language proficiency (in L2 and L1?); acculturation orientations Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., “language-sensitive instruction”, language support Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
In termsofstructuralintegration… … completely different situation in Australiathan in most European countries. • In Australia, structuralintegrationofimmigrantstudents in termsofachievementseemstobelargelyensured. • Partly due tosocietallevel:Differences in immigrationpoliciesaffectcompositionofstudentbody.
In termsofstructuralintegration… … completely different situation in Australiathan in most European countries. • In Australia, structuralintegrationofimmigrantstudents in termsofachievementseemstobelargelyensured. • Partly due tosocietallevel:Differences in immigrationpoliciesaffectcompositionofstudentbody. • Yetsomechallengesassociatedwithimmigrationandintegrationmayneverthelessbesimilartothoseexperienced in other countries.
Cultural Identity Cultural identityas sense ofbelongingto a socialgroup(e.g., Horenczyk, 2008; Phinney, 1990). • Most studies thus far focused on the role of immigrant students’ cultural identity for school-related adaption in terms of attitudes toward school, self-efficacy, self-reported grades (e.g., Altschul et al., 2008; Berry et al., 2006; Oyserman et al., 2001). • Studies have rarely used achiement measures. • Samples are rarely representative.
Current state of research • Findings of existing studies are heterogeneous. • Most studies focused on the role of cultural identity for school-related adaption in terms of attitudes toward school, self-efficacy, self-reported grades. (e.g., Altschul et al., 2008; Berry et al., 2006; Oyserman et al., 2001) • Studies with achievement as dependent variable are rare. • Samples are rarely representative. • First analyses in the context of the German PISA study 2009.
Operationalization not at all somewhatvery thepeoplefromthecountryofmyparents thepeoplefrom Germany Ifyourparentsweren‘tborn in Germany: Towhatextent do youfeelyoubelongtothefollowinggroups? (please tick onlyone box in eachrow)
Database • German PISA 2009 sample • Target population: 15-year-old students • N = 6146 studentswithout an immigrantbackground • N = 2478 studentswith an immigrantbackground • N= 202 schools • Main testdomain: readingliteracy • (M = 500, SD = 100)
Cultural identityorientationsandachievement: Summary offindings • More than half ofadolescents in Germany report a sense ofbelongingtothecontextofresidence. • About 20% oftheadolescentsaremarginalized / indifferent. • Marginalization / Indifferencesseemstobeassociatedwithlowerachievement. • A lack identificationwiththecountryofresidenceseemstobeassociatedwithlowerachievement. • Hypothesis: Lack ofidentificationlikelytobemoreprevalent in Germany / European countries than in Australia Limitationsofthestudy: • Operationalizationofculturalidentitybased on twoitems. • Causalityunclear longitudinal analysesnecessary (National Educational Panel Study). • Underlyingmechanismsunclear, such astheinterplayamongculturalidentity, language, andachievement.
School Level Community Level Teaching Learning Socialization Development Teacher Level Student Level Classroom Level School Type Level System Level Societal Level Determinantsofimmigrantstudents‘ educationalsuccess: A multi-level perspective e.g., composition of student body in classrooms Stanat(2006), based on Bronfenbrenner‘s ecological model of human development (see also OECD, 2004)
Assumptionsaboutcompositioneffects • The proportionofimmigrantstudentsmayhave negative effects on studentlearningfor a numberofreasons (for an overviewseeEksner & Stanat, 2010): • Fewerressources, lowerteachermotivation in schoolswithhigherproportionsofimmigrantstudents (e.g., Rumberger & Willms, 1992). • Lowerteacherexpectations (e.g., Westerbeek, 1999). • Lessexposuretolanguageofinstruction (e.g., Esser, 2006).
Current state of research • During the last 15 years, a number of studies have tested student composition effects on achievement (e.g., Westerbeek, 1999; Opdenakker & Van Damme, 2001; Stanat, 2006; Thrupp et al., 2002). • The quality of the studies has increased over time (e.g., from cross-sectional to longitudinal studies). • Main research questions: • Does an immigration-related composition effect exist, independent of SES-related composition effects? • Can background-related composition effects be attributed to achievement-related composition?
Database • KESS-studycarried out in Hamburg (Bos et al., 2004) • Longitudinal assessment: • T1 at end of 4th grade • T2 atbeginningof 7th grade • N= 10,447 studentswithdataforbothmeasurementpoints • N = 3744 studentswith an immigrantbackground • N = 2056 studentswhomainlyspeakanotherlanguagethan German athome • Focus ofanalyses: readingcomprehension • (M = 0, SD = 100)
