1 / 25

dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat Institute of Administrative Studies University of Wrocław

Leadership in organizations. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat Institute of Administrative Studies University of Wrocław. Leadership in Organizations. Leadership Amitai Etzioni (Werner Falk), born 1929 :

denzel
Télécharger la présentation

dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat Institute of Administrative Studies University of Wrocław

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Leadership in organizations dr. hab. Jerzy SupernatInstitute of Administrative StudiesUniversity of Wrocław

  2. Leadership in Organizations Leadership Amitai Etzioni (Werner Falk), born 1929: Leadership is a special form of power, one that involves the ability, based on the personal qualities of the leader, to elicit the followers’ voluntary compliance in a broad range of matters. Leadership is distinguished from the concept of power in that it entails influence, that is change of preferences, while power implies only that subjects’ preferences are held in abeyance. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  3. Amitai Etzioni

  4. Leadership in Organizations Daniel Katz (1903-1998), Robert L. Kahn (born 1918): We consider the essence of organizational leadership to be the influential increment over and above mechanical compliance with the routine directions of the organization. Thus, leadership involves more than simply the normal exercise of authority that is based on a position in the organization or claimed by a member or members of organizations because of the formal requirements of their jobs. It often involves attributions of particular traits and abilities to people by their followers. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  5. From left to right: Daniel Katz, Basil Willerman, Robert L. Kahn, Kermit Schooler, Richard Snyder.

  6. Robert L. Kahn

  7. Leadership in Organizations Leadership position Leadership is not confined to any particular group or any level within an organization, and at least in theory, does not necessarily involve formal authority. Nonetheless, the vast majority of studies of leadership have focused on persons who have been assigned a leadership position, that is, who have some authority by virtue of their po-sition. According to Philip Selznick (1919-2010) formal leaders fulfill four fundamental functions. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  8. Leadership in Organizations • Functions of formal leaders as seen by Philip Selznik: • defining organizational mission and role • choosing the means to achieve the ends desired, or ensuring that the structure reflects and is designed to accomplish the mission effectively (the institutional embodiment of purpose) • defending the organization’s integrity (leaders must secure support for the organization from both the pu-blic and their own members, without allowing either external or internal constituents to fundamentally re-shape the organization’s mission) • ordering of internal conflict dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  9. Philip Selznick

  10. Leadership in Organizations • Components of leadership • Generally speaking there are three types of components (factors) that determine who becomes defined as leader: • more or less permanent characteristics and traits of in-dividuals (see the next slide ) • behaviors and styles that individuals may exhibit(leadership often involves two very different types of behavior: 1) task/production oriented and 2) employeeoriented) • characteristics of followers and/or particular situationthat a group or organization is facing(in one situation, an individual, who exhibits certain behaviors and styles is more likely to be defined as a leader, whereas in other situations, different individuals, exhibiting different behaviours and styles, are more likely to be seen as leaders) dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  11. Leadership in Organizations • The „big five” personality characteristics / traits: • extraversion • conscientiousness • emotional stability • agreeableness • openness Extraversion refers to a person’s comfort level with relationships. Extraverts are sociable, talkative, assertive, and open to establishing new relationships. Conscientiousness refers to the number of goals on which a person focuses. People who focus on relatively few goals at one time are likely to be organized, systematic, careful, thorough, responsible, and self-disciplined as they work to pursue those goals. People with less negative emotionality will be relatively poised, calm, resilient, secure, and might be expected to handle job stress, pressure, and tension relatively well. Agreeableness refers to a person’s ability to get along with others. Agreeableness causes some people to be gentle, cooperative, forgiving, understanding, and good-natured in their dealings with others. Openness refers to a person’s rigidity of beliefs and range of interests. People with high level of openness are willing to listen to new ideas and to change their own ideas, beliefs, and attitudes as a result of new information. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  12. Leadership in Organizations Theories of leadership dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  13. Leadership in Organizations • James MacGregor Burns’ leadership theory • transactional leadership • transformational leadership dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  14. Leadership in Organizations Transactional leadership Transactional leadershipseeks to motivate followers by appealing to their own self-interest. Its principles are to motivate by the exchange process. For example, business owners exchange status and wages for the work effort of the employee. In the political environment, politicians may exchange favors or government jobs for votes. Tran-sactional behavior focuses on the accomplishment of tasks and good worker relationships in exchange for desirable rewards. Transactional leadership may encour-age the leader to adapt their style and behavior to meet the perceived expectations of the followers. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  15. Leadership in Organizations Transformational leadership „Transforming leadership (...) occurs when one or more persons engage with others in such a way that leaders and followers raise one another to higher levels of motivation and morality. Their purposes, which might have started out as separate but related, as in the case of transactional leadership, become fused. Power bases are linked not as counterweights but as mutual support for common purpose. Various names are used for such leadership, some of them derisory: elevating, mobilizing, inspiring, exalting, uplifting, preaching, exhorting, evangelizing. The relationship can be moralistic, of course. But transforming leadership ultimately becomes moral in that it raises the level of human conduct and ethical aspiration of both leader and led, and thus it has a transforming effect on both”. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  16. James MacGregor Burns, born 1918 With professor Susan Dunn

  17. Leadership in Organizations Divorced from ethics, leadership is reduced to manage-ment and politics to mere technique. In real life, the most practical advice for leaders is not to treat pawns like pawns, nor princes like princes, but allpersons like persons. Woodrow Wilson called for leaders who, by boldly inter-preting the nation's conscience, could lift a people out of their everyday selves. That people can be lifted into their better selves is the secret of transforming leadership. James McGregor Burns

  18. Martin Luther King (1929-1968) – the transformational leader

  19. Martin Luther King delivers his famous speech I have a dream on the28th of August 1963 at the Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C.

  20. Leadership in Organizations Robert K. Greenleaf’s (1904-1990)servant leadership theory Servant leadership is mostly a matter of attitude. The servant leader is servant first. It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. This conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to assuage one’s unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  21. Leadership in Organizations Servant leadership vs. Bicycle leadership* * The visual picture implied in bicycle leadership is that managers bend their back to those above while they trample those below. dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

  22. Holy Bible. New International Version. Ezekiel; 34, 2. Woe to the shepherds of Israel who only take care of themselves! Should not shepherds take care of the flock?

  23. Good News Bible. The Gospel According to Mark;9, 35. Jesus Christ: „Whoever wants to be first must place himself last of all and be the servant of all”.

  24. Robert K. Greenleaf. Left in 1908 on his father’s knee. Epitaph above his grave reads: Potentially a good plumber. Ruined by a sophisticated education.

  25. Concluding Remark Leadership is action, not position. Donald H. McGannon dr. hab. Jerzy Supernat

More Related