1 / 31

Project objectives and definition

Project objectives and definition. F. A DRAGNA Project Manager - Mercator Ocean. Context. GMES : Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Core Service = European Public Service To support and develop Downstream activities Definition and setting up : FP7

derex
Télécharger la présentation

Project objectives and definition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projectobjectives and definition F. ADRAGNA Project Manager - Mercator Ocean

  2. Context GMES : Global Monitoring for Environment and Security • Core Service = European Public Service • To support and develop Downstream activities • Definition and setting up : FP7 • 3 « Fast Tracks Services » : • Emergency Response Core service : SAFER (Infoterra Fr.) • Land Monitoring Core Service : Geoland-2 (Infoterra Gmbh – Medias) • Marine Core Service : MyOcean (Mercator-Ocean) • 2 « Pilot Services » : • Security : G-Mosaic (Telespazio) • Atmosphere : MACC (ECMWF) • + « Climate »

  3. Goal of the project MyOcean overall objectives are to • set up a concerted and integrated pan-European capacity for ocean monitoring and forecasting, using nationally-available skills and resources. • demonstrate the operationality of the system, based on a « service oriented » organization, according to the European quality standards, and to achieve operational qualification and eventually qualification of Service. • bring a new pan-european value for the benefit of the marine service providers on duty at national or european levels. • contribute to the long-term sustainability of this pan-European capacity.

  4. Areas of benefit • MyOcean will “provide the common denominator data for all users in the marine sector, in other words the information for existing & new downstream services.” • Climate • Marine Environment • Seasonal and weather forecasting • Offshore • Maritime transport and safety • Fisheries • Research • General Public

  5. Market Segmentation • MyOcean will “provide the common denominator data for all users in the marine sector, in other words the information for existing & new downstream services.” Area 1 « MARINE SAFETY » (marine operations, oil spill combat, ship routing, defense, search & rescue, …) Area 3 « MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENT » (water quality, pollution, coastal activities, …) Area 4 « CLIMATE & SEASONAL FORECASTING » (climate monitoring, ice, seasonal forecasting, ..) Area 2 « MARINE RESSOURCES » (fish stock management, ICES, FAO, …)

  6. (to whom) The targeted users • The Key Users • MyOcean will deliver a service to • EU: The European Union • Users: European agencies (EEA, EMSA, EDA, ...) • MS: The Member States • Users: National / Regional Service Providers (public or private) • IG: The Intergovernmental bodies • Users: MS and/or exec.bodies such as OSPAR, UNEP-MAP, HELCOM, ICES, ... EEA EMSA EDA ... Met Offices Ocean centers ... Env. agencies Research centers Navies, CoastGuards, .. OSPAR UNEP-MAP ICES ... CORE

  7. The MyOcean offer • MyOcean will • “deliver regular and systematic reference information (processed data, elaborated products) on the state of the oceans and regional seas: • at the resolution required by intermediate users & downstream service providers, of known quality and accuracy, • for the global and European regional seas.” • Physical state of the ocean, and primary ecosystem • For global ocean, and main European basins and seas • Large and basin scale ; mesoscale physics • Hindcast, Nowcast, Forecast • Data, Assimilation and Models

  8. Scope of responsibility Provider MyOcean European Core Service Provider END - USERS OBSERVATIONS Provider Provider The upstream cut-off The downstream cut-off upstream to our service ... is done (duty) by an observation agency or center (raw data) Example : Eumetsat SAF or the ESA PAC downstream to our service: ... is done (duty), or will be better done (skill) by a specialized agency, a European agency or a national center ; usually already in place Example : COASTAL SYSTEMS Data, Model European added-value

  9. (when) The project schedule • A 39 months project (3 years + 3 months) • Governed by the “qualification steps” • Stream 1 (MFC Global, Med, Arctic), qualified at month 18 • Stream 2 (MFC Baltic, NWS, IBI, B.Sea) qualified at month 24 GMES Implementation GMES Operations 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 MCS Workshop QUALIF Stream 1 CALL PROPOSAL KICK-OFF QUALIF Stream 2 MY OCEAN project (prototyping core system) Qualif Stream 1 Qualif Stream 2

  10. Projectorganization

  11. WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI USERS - Intermediate USERS MyO Work Breakdown Structure 7 MFCs + 5 TACs = 12 Production Units each Production Unit = 1 Sub-System

  12. The MyOcean value 6 European Seas + Global Ocean

  13. MyO Work Breakdown Structure WP 16 WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI S e r v i c e D e s k USERS - Intermediate USERS

  14. MyO Work Breakdown Structure 7 MFCs + 5 TACs + Central Desk + MIS = 14 Sub-Systems WP 16 WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 2.3 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 MyOcean Information System Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI S e r v i c e D e s k For each Sub-System: • Design, Development and Qualification • Operations USERS - Intermediate USERS

  15. MyO Work Breakdown Structure WP 16 WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 2.3 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 WP 2 Central Engineering MyOcean Information System Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color WP 3 Central R&D Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI S e r v i c e D e s k USERS - Intermediate USERS

  16. MyO Work Breakdown Structure WP 16 WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 2.3 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 WP 2 Central Engineering MyOcean Information System Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color WP 3 Central R&D Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI S e r v i c e D e s k USERS - Intermediate USERS WP 17 Service Definition (SLA) WP 18 Users Needs (URD)

  17. MYO : a System of Systems WP 1 Coord. & Management WP 16 WP 10 WP 15 WP 14 WP 13 WP 12 WP 11 WP 5 WP 6 WP 2.3 WP 4 WP 9 WP 8 WP 7 WP 2 Central Engineering MyOcean Information System Sea Surface Temperature Global / North Atlantic Mediterrannean Sea North West Shelves Sea Ice - Wind Ocean Color WP 3 Central R&D Black Sea Sea Level Balticic In Situ Arctic IBI S e r v i c e D e s k USERS - Intermediate USERS WP 17 Service Definition (SLA) WP 18 Users Needs (URD)

  18. System organization12 production units

  19. WP1: Strategy, Mercator Ocean WP2: Central engineering, CLS WP3: Central R&D, CNRS WP16: Central Desk, Met Office WP17: Portfolio, Mercator Ocean WP18: Users Needs, HCMR WP4: Global MFC, Mercator Ocean WP5: Arctic MFC, NERSC WP6: Baltic MFC, DMI WP7: NWS MFC, Met Office WP8: IBI MFC, Mercator Ocean WP9: Med Sea MFC, INGV WP10: Black Sea MFC, MHI WP11: Sea Level TAC, CLS WP12: Ocean Color, CNR WP13: SST TAC, Météo France WP14: Sea Ice & Wind TAC, met.no WP15: In Situ TAC, Ifremer WP Responsibilities

  20. Project Organization • Steering Committee  Board • P.Bahurel (chair, coord), M.Bell (UK), E.Buch (DK), F.Jacq (FR), J.Johannessen (NO), PY Le Traon (FR), N.Pinardi (IT) • Has driven the proposal preparation, drives the negotiation phase, interface with EC ; will be part of the project « Board » • Executive Committee • Project manager: F.Adragna (Mercator Ocean) • Assisted by the PMO (Project Management Office) : 4 persons • 18 WP Leaders • Have driven the Work content and preparation and schedule ; form the « Executive Committee » of the project • Core User Group, in preparation through WP19 (K.Nittis) • Scientific Advisory Committee, in preparation through WP3 (P.Brasseur)

  21. Project Management European Commission Project Coordinator General Assembly Board Governing Bodies Review Group Review Group Review Group Review Group Core User Group Scientific Advisory Committee (…) Project Manager Project Management Office (WP 1) Executive Committee L_WP16 Central Service Desk L_WP18 Users Requirement & Integration L_WP2 Central Engineering L_WP17 Service Portfolio & Monitoring L_WP3 Central R&D Service Evolution & Cal/Val QuARG SCAMG L_WP4 Global MFC L_WP5 Arctic MFC L_WP6 Baltic MFC L_WP7 NW MFC L_WP8 IBI MFC L_WP9 Med MFC L_WP10 B.Sea MFC L_WP12 OC TAC L_WP13 SST TAC L_WP14 SIW TAC L_WP15 InSitu TAC L_WP11 SL TAC

  22. Consortium • 60 Partners (today) – representing 28 countries • Met’ Offices • Marine / Hydrographic / Oceanographic centers • Research centers, … • 6 Private companies • CLS : Central Engineering and Altimetry • ACRI : Ocean Color TAC • StarLab : Users management (URD, SLA, …) • Brockmann Consult : Users management (URD, SLA, …) • HR Wallingford : Central Desk (reviewing activities) • Techworks : Central desk (web based technical work) • Budget • 55 M€ (33,8 M€ EC-Grant) • 84% : personnel cost • 7% travel cost • 190 FTE (~ 400 persons directly involved in the project)

  23. Consortium

  24. Budget distribution

  25. The service • MyOcean is focussed on a strict « core » service • No « downstream » activities • No « on request » production A « core service » limited to : • « Easy-download-of-bulk-and-assessed » information • + « Discovering & Viewing» of this ocean information Delivery : two kinds of Users • Registered / Regular Users (Met’Offices, Navies,…) • Occasionnal Users (Researchers, EU Citizen, …)

  26. NSP / oil spill SMITH English John Arctic XX Met Office Oil spill Ftps:// Ocean forecast Oil spill Arctic permanent Institution. Ftps:// SST Oil spill Arctic permanent Institution. Ftps:// SLA –currents Oil spill Global permanent Institution. Opendap Reanalysis Environment Arctic On request Institution. Ftps:// Ocean forecast Emergency Global On request Institution. Ftps:// SSH Emergency ibi-portugal On request Institution. Ftps:// SLA –currents Emergency Global On request Institution. Opendap Ocean forecast Safety at sea Global permanent restricted Opendap Example

  27. Standard parameters The service • A Product Portfolio relying on User Requirements • Service specifications • Products description & availability • Dissemination • The MyOcean marine core service: • View and download easily • A fully assessed « bulk » information • On the ocean state (phys. & bio) • In real time, and with reanalyses • At global and basin/euro-regional scales • Through obs- and model-based products

  28. Statusof the proposal

  29. MyOcean Status • Submission Phase: January - June 2007 • EC / FP7 Space call for the GMES Fast-Track Services • « MyOcean » proposal submitted in June 2007 • Evaluation phase: September - December 2007 • Sept: Hearings, EC and its expert team • Oct: FP7 Space National representatives • Nov: EC Inter-service consultation • Accepted for negotiation at the end of 2007 • Negotiation phase: January - October 2008 • Feb : first meeting with EC and its negotiation team • March 14, April 25, May 26 : new versions of the proposal, • October 31: submission of the final version of the proposal MyOcean • Contractual phase: June - December 2008… • Objective : signature mid February 2009 • Project start : 1st January 2009 (administratively) • Kick Off : 1st April 2009 (T0) in Toulouse • End of the project : 31st March 2012 (T0+36)

More Related