1 / 20

Raising the Bar: Refocused Indicators for U.S. Government Assistance to Pakistan

Raising the Bar: Refocused Indicators for U.S. Government Assistance to Pakistan. Prepared for: The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) By: Isaac Eagan Senay Goitom Santosh Lamichhane Paige Muegenburg Natalie Olson. Team Members.

derry
Télécharger la présentation

Raising the Bar: Refocused Indicators for U.S. Government Assistance to Pakistan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Raising the Bar: Refocused Indicators for U.S. Government Assistance to Pakistan Prepared for: The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) By: Isaac Eagan SenayGoitom SantoshLamichhane Paige Muegenburg Natalie Olson

  2. Team Members Isaac Eagan SantoshLamichhaneSenayGoitom Paige Muegenburg Natalie Olson

  3. Executive Summary • The Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act outlined a new, whole-of-nation approach for U.S. government aid to Pakistan. • Clear, focused indicators are needed to measure the effectiveness of this new approach. • We propose 23 indicators measuring progress in security, political/economic, and social services assistance.

  4. U.S. Government Aid to Pakistan From FY2002 - FY2010 U.S. provided ~ $11 billion in aid • $7 billion in civilian aid • $4.3 billion in economic and political aid • $2.7 billion in social services aid • $4.4 billion in security related aid

  5. Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act (EPPA) • Signed into law in 2009 • Authorizes $7.5 billion in civilian aid from FY2010 – FY2014 • Effectively triples amount of civilian aid

  6. U.S. Government Aid to Pakistan

  7. The Issue • We need to ensure that adequate measures are in place to assess this new strategy in Pakistan.

  8. How We Assessed Aid Effectiveness • Determined the primary goals of the U.S. government for each aid category. • Selected indicators based on the following questions: • How applicable is the indicator to the stated goal? • How quantifiable is the indicator? • Are there existing data, or is it feasible that data could be easily collected? • Is there scholarly evidence to support the effectiveness of the indicator?

  9. How We Developed Our Indicators We examined those outlined by: • 2010 Quarterly Progress and Oversight Report on the Civilian Assistance Program in Pakistan • Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) • State Department/USAID’s Standard Foreign Assistance Indicators • Alternate governmental, non-governmental, and academic sources

  10. Security-related Goals • Disruption of internal extremist activities • Increased security along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border • Improvements in nuclear weapons containment

  11. Security-related Indicators

  12. Political Goals • Improving Local Governance Capacity • Strengthening Electoral Institutions • Strengthening Civil Society

  13. Political Indicators

  14. Economic Goals • Increasing Performance in Agriculture Sector • 21 percent of Pakistan’s GDP • employs 43 percent of its total labor force • 90 percent of water earmarked for agricultural use (1/3 of which is wasted) • Improving Performance in Energy Sector • Loss of industrial productivity due to frequent energy shortfalls and blackouts are estimated to cost $2.5 billion and 400,000 jobs per year • Manufacturing and industrial sectors account for 24 percent of Pakistan's GDP

  15. Economic Indicators

  16. Social Services Goals • Improve Education • Universal access to public, modernized education • Construction and maintenance of libraries and public schools • Increased vocational and technical training for at-risk youth • Increased opportunities for women and girls • Increased female literacy • Improve Public Health • Reduce and eliminate major infectious diseases • Reduce maternal mortality and mortality under age five • Provide safe drinking water • Meet family planning needs

  17. Social Services Indicators

  18. Conclusion • Limitations • Aid measurement challenges • Availability of information • Lag time in results • Clear, focused framework to measure progress

  19. Questions?

  20. For further information Contact the La Follette School’s publications office at 608-263-7657 or publications@lafollette.wisc.edu Or see www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workshops.html Thank you

More Related