1 / 27

Double Chooz Experiment and Applied Neutrino Physics

Double Chooz Experiment and Applied Neutrino Physics. http://doublechooz.in2p3.fr/.  Search for  13 Simulation of e - and  energy spectra Applied  physics: power measurement, non-proliferation. CEA Saclay : M. Cribier, T. Lasserre, A. Letourneau, D. Lhuillier, T. Mueller

dewitt
Télécharger la présentation

Double Chooz Experiment and Applied Neutrino Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Double Chooz Experiment and Applied Neutrino Physics http://doublechooz.in2p3.fr/ • Search for 13 • Simulation of e- and  energy spectra • Applied  physics: power measurement, • non-proliferation • CEA Saclay :M. Cribier, T. Lasserre,A. Letourneau, D. Lhuillier, T. Mueller • SUBATECH-NANTES: S. Cormon, M. Fallot, L.Giot, B. Guillon, J. Martino, J.H. Xu Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  2. Double Chooz Experiment  oscillation @1050m 2 identical 8.3t targets  flux Normalization @280m • PHASE 1 (2009-10) • - Far detector only • - sin2(213)<0.06 • (1,5 years,90% C.L.) • PHASE 2 (2011…) • - Far + Near sites • - sin2(213)<0.025 • (3 years,90% C.L.) 2 PWR-N4 2x4.27 GWth Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  3. Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  4. Accurate Simulation of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra • Determine normalization and shape for phase 1 (dominant error) • Use near detector to validate studies of applied neutrino physics: - Power measurement - Non-proliferation Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  5. exp. spectrum fissile mat. + FY nuclear database models neutron flux Core geometry isotope abundances Principle of our Approach • branch spectrum: BESTIOLE Evolution code: MURE  spectra database for all isotopes Weighted  Total  and e- energy spectra with complete error treatment Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  6. Evolution Code MURE MCNP Utility for Reactor Evolution • Neutron flux automatically adjusted to total power parameter • Evolution equations and time step sizes validated, propagation of fission yield error • Account for neutron capture • (V. Kopeikin et al., Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67 (2004) 1963) • Working on the geometry of a N4 reactor core Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  7. Simulation of Chooz Reactors • - Fuel: enriched Uranium • - Moderator/Coolant: Light pressurized Water (155 Bar, 600K) 2 PWR - N4 2x4.27 GWth Fuel Assembly Core Fuel rod (0.2x0.2x4.8m) (D: 0.8 cm ; h:4.8 m) 205 Assemblies 264 rods Zircalloy Fuel UO2 pellets (2.1, 2.6, 3.1 % enrichment) Control rods (Instrumentation, Poisons…) CPU limited, working on suitable sym. and approx. Full power and burn up info from electricity company during data taking Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  8. Building Total e- and  Spectra Reactor spectrum: Sum of “n” isotopes of “i”  branches dN/dE = SnYn(Z,A,t)SiBRn,iP(En,E0i,Z) branching ratios for decay branch i with endpoint E0i shape Fission yields Strategy: • Collect all available exp. info on individual  branches • Remaining short-lived, high Q, nuclei described by nuclear models. • Propagate all errors and compute correlations for any combination of fissile materials and any irradiation time. • Final cross-check with integral measurements. Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  9. Energy Spectrum  spectrum: P(E,E0i,Z)  F(Z,E) . pE(E0i-E)2 . Sn(E)  spectrum: Phase space E0=Ee+Efor each  branch Coulomb corrections Spectral Shape factor Well controlled for allowed and forbidden unique transitions info on all b branches • unambiguous conversion to  spectrum Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  10. e electron IntegralValidation 235U 1.5 days Agreement within 1 up to 6 MeV 950 nuclei, ~10000  branches Validation of spectrum shape No absolute normalization yet Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  11. Error Bars Good control of low energy part [1.8-6] MeV Relevant for normalization of phase 1 • Expect final error bar comparable to integral data: BR, E0,Shape included, working on fission yields error • Computation of correlations on progress • -->Significant gain in sensitivity to shape distortions because most errors induce large correlations (Pth, Y, BR, E0). Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  12. Power Measurement Burn up effect: Project of miniature detector based on Double Chooz concept To be installed ~10m from reactor core Unique tool for cross-calibration of reactor cores ! Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  13. NonProliferation For a fixed thermal power, the measured e fluxes from pure 235U or 239Pu would differ by 55%… but realistic scenario implies tiny effect. Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  14. Conclusion • Promising preliminary results for normalization of Double Chooz phase 1. • -Original approach with complete treatment of error bars and their correlations (expected to be large) • Same simulation package is a key element of future applied  physics: • -Project of 2-3%power measurement with miniature detector • -non-proliferation. Looks difficult, first goal is to determine detection threshold for removed Pu mass and point out critical unknown nuclei to increase sensitivity Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  15. Backup Slices Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  16. Double Chooz Concept Nuclear power station 2 cores: 4.27 GWth Near detector ~280 m Far detector 1050 m e e,, flux : 1021e/s Disappearance experiment Clean measurement of 13 Near detector P(e e) = 1-sin2(213)sin2(m231L/4E) Far detector 2.5 10-3 eV 3.0 10-3 eV Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  17. Expected Oscillation Signal Assuming: Far Spectrum m2atm= 3.0 10-3 eV2 sin2(213)=0.12 After 3 years Near Spectrum Far/Near ratio Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  18. Previous Studies • Theoretical approach:Klapdor & Metzinger microscopic calc. of trans. matrix elements (PLB82 + PRL82), Vogel et al. for 238U • Integral b-spectrameasured by Schreckenbach et al. (at better than 2% until 8 MeV) & Hahn et al. @ILL 235U, 239,241Pu targets, (PLB218(1989)365) but conversion : global fit including 30 arbitrary contributions: global shape uncertainty from 1.3%@3MeV to 9%@8MeV • FP contributions :measurements of Tengblad et al. (NPA503(1989)136) 111 nuclei @ISOLDE don’t agree with the experimental integral spectra (important errors : 5% at 4MeV, 11% at 5MeV and 20% at 8MeV) • Chooz and Bugey :energy spectrum and fluxin agreement with Scheckenbach et al. + Vogel et al. for 238U, 1.9 % error on reactor ne flux Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  19. 1 1 2 2 Exp. Spectra of Fission Products 111 fission products measured by Tengblad’s et al at ISOLDE • 48 nuclei in perfect agreement with our database • Remaining 63 replaced. • Correct error • estimate requires • careful treatment • of fit correlations Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  20. BDB Bestiole Data Base root and ascii formats • 950 nuclei • ~10000  branches • 500 -n branches • Interfaced to various sources of information • tag all relevant info (forbiddenness, level of approx., …) Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  21. Electron spectra Error Bars Spectrum Shape • Requires spin and parity of nuclear levels • No predictions for non-unique transitions • Use envelop of illustrated shapes to determine error • (extra info from exp. shape factors) Quote preliminary ±2.5% sys. error Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  22. Error Bars From ENSDF nuclear database: •  • dBR • Errors on all branches treated as independent…. • Converges as Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  23. Treatment of Correlations 2 test of two independent data sets: Generalized 2 test with correlated errors: , Adapted to different studies: -Oscillations: data (R) vs simul (S) -Non prolif: simul vs simul Numerically computed Expect large gain in sensitivity to shape distortions because most errors induce large correlations (dPth, dY, dBR, E0). Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  24. BESTIOLE +Tengblad et al. (JEF2.2) + Gross Theory from ENDFBVI, JENDL and JEFF3.1 BESTIOLE + Tengblad et al.(JEF2.2) + Qbeta approx Models for Unknown  spectra Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  25. Pandemonium Effect   0 A Z N det drops fast with E + difficult analysis of continuum  0 A Z-1N’ • If not included in database: • - Underestimation of the low E part of the spectrum w.r.t. high energy part • - Tengblad’s measurement, not sensitive to pandemonium, partly correct for this effect Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  26. Previous Power Measurements Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

  27. SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station • Detector located in tendon gallery: • det~ 10% • 469 evts/day Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Labs Evidence for burn up effect (?) Lhuillier David - CEA Saclay - France

More Related