1 / 13

QoE Evaluation Methodology for HD Video Streaming using Social Networking

QoE Evaluation Methodology for HD Video Streaming using Social Networking. 報告人：張景舜 作者 ： Gardlo , B . ； Ries, M. ; Rupp, M. ; Jarina, R . ； Dept. of Telecommun . & Multimedia, Univ. of Zilina , Zilina , Slovakia . I. INTRODUCTION.

diamond
Télécharger la présentation

QoE Evaluation Methodology for HD Video Streaming using Social Networking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QoEEvaluation Methodology for HD Video Streaming using Social Networking 報告人：張景舜 作者：Gardlo, B.；Ries, M. ; Rupp, M. ; Jarina, R.；Dept. of Telecommun. & Multimedia, Univ. of Zilina, Zilina, Slovakia 

  2. I. INTRODUCTION • Quality-of-Experience (QoE) and Social networks has gained strong interest, both from a research and a commercial perspective. • Assessment methodologies are extremely time consuming and poorly reflect ”real world” scenarios.

  3. II. USER BASED ASSESSMENT • Relationship between user, application and network. • Absolute Category Rating (ACR)

  4. II. USER BASED ASSESSMENT • Influence factors of quality of experience(QoE)

  5. III. CONTEXT INFLUENCE AND QOE • Modern social networks rely not just on the messaging concept • 46% of them are under 25 years old and another 26% is under 35 years.

  6. III. CONTEXT INFLUENCE AND QOE • A. Audiovisual content • SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTENT CLASSES • B. Social and Cultural Aspects

  7. IV. TECHNICAL SYSTEM • A. Encoder settings • Audio content was encoded using an AAC codec with 48 kHz sampling rate and96 kbit/s bit rate. • Each of these sequences was further encoded into five equally distanced video bit rates, 2 Mbit/s for the best quality, and 800 kbit/s for the lowest quality (300 kbit/s step size).

  8. IV. TECHNICAL SYSTEM • B. End User Devices • Targeting our QoE assessment application on the HD multimedia content, we cannot guarantee that this content will be also watched on native HD capable screens. • About 50% of the users use resolutions of 1024x768, 1280x800 or similar.

  9. V. QOE ASSESSMENT A. Statistical relevance of obtained subjective evaluations

  10. V. QOE ASSESSMENT • 評估方法 • s : sample variance • d : accuracy parameter (allowed error in estimation) • x^: sample mean • μ : true population mean • n : minimum sample size

  11. V. QOE ASSESSMENT • B. Assessment results Action movie 800 kbit/s MOS Histogram. Action movie 2000kbit/s MOS Histogram.

  12. V. QOE ASSESSMENT • MOS values with their 95% confidence intervals.

  13. VI. CONCLUSION • The methodology provides a high applicability for subjective testing of the multimedia services with respect to real usage scenarios. • With the social data available throughout the social network, we can target certain specific user groups, with no need of performing exhausting social studies. • All these facts support the high statistical significance of the results.

More Related