1 / 31

Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service, Science Team

Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service, Science Team. Richard Aplin richard.aplin@hants.gov.uk Dave Whittle david.whittle@hants.gov.uk Frank Fearn frank.fearn@hants.gov.uk. An experiential model for professional development. In a nutshell. We are not teaching students the right things

dinh
Télécharger la présentation

Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service, Science Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service, Science Team Richard Aplin richard.aplin@hants.gov.uk Dave Whittle david.whittle@hants.gov.uk Frank Fearn frank.fearn@hants.gov.uk An experiential model for professional development

  2. In a nutshell • We are not teaching students the right things • They are not enjoying it anyway • Not sure boards and SNS have the right models to rectify the problem • We think we have a different approach that may help

  3. Students attitudes to secondary science • Jonathon Osborne (SSR March 2008) • Drop off at KS2-3 transfer

  4. Crisis of scienceorcrisis of science education?

  5. Simple definition of science • A body of knowledge acquired through the ‘scientific method’ • Finding truths through the gathering and analysis of evidence.

  6. Two issues with teaching how to be scientific • Do we have effective models for teaching how to be scientific? • The discrete skills models • Do teachers have sufficient experience of doing science themselves?

  7. The experiential model

  8. Starting with the experience • Do some proper science

  9. Why do F1 racing cars have wide wheels?

  10. The rising floating candle

  11. Starting with the experience • Do some proper science • Unpick what made it feel like science • Establish some ‘Non-Negotiables’

  12. Starting with the experience • Do some proper science • Unpick what made it feel like science • Establish some ‘Non-Negotiables’ • “Go away and give students opportunities to do what you just did” (i.e. plan lessons around the NNs)

  13. How did it go? • Feedback against NNs • Identify blocks (student and teacher) • Agree foci for action

  14. Less appropriate prompts • How would you improve your investigation? • Draw a line of best fit • Write a method for your experiment • And what you should have found out is……..

  15. impact

  16. Aims of the project: • Create a bank of tried and evaluated teaching resources to develop children’s scientific problem solving skills • Develop as professionals as a result of collaboration • Improve children’s problem solving skills over the course of the project. • Increase the motivation of able children

  17. Students experience of the scientific process • How would you check your ideas in science lessons? • How would scientists check their ideas?

  18. 80% 60% 40% 20% Test Test Other Other Ask teacher Ask teacher Check with others Check with others Internet / books Internet / books How would you check your ideas in science lessons? How would scientists check their ideas?

  19. After a year of the project?

  20. How would you check your ideas in science lessons? (After) 80% 60% 40% 20% Test Test Other Other Ask teacher Ask teacher Check with others Check with others Internet / books Internet / books How would you check your ideas in science lessons? (Before)

  21. 80% 60% 40% 20% Test Test Other Other Ask teacher Ask teacher Check with others Check with others Internet / books Internet / books How would scientists check their ideas? (before) How would scientists check their ideas? (after)

  22. Before After Summary • 36% checked their ideas by testing • 26% asked teacher • 25% checked their ideas by checking with others • Over 70% thought scientists checked their ideas by testing • Only 10% thought scientists checked their ideas with others • 20% checked their ideas by testing • 46% asked teacher • 20% checked their ideas by checking with others • Over 70% thought scientists checked their ideas by testing • Only 7% thought scientists checked their ideas with others

  23. Has it improved the enjoyment and motivation of students? • Three words to describe your science lessons

  24. Three words to describe your science lessons Project students Comparator groups

  25. Summary • Starting from the experience has encouraged teachers to give students more independence in their scientific thinking. • The student experience better matches their notion of what scientists do • Students are more positive about their science lessons • The ‘product’ acted as a driver but is not the valuable outcome

  26. Next steps • Making problem solving integral to the development of students scientific ideas • Extending the use of the experiential model.

  27. Hampshire science team Richard Aplin richard.aplin@hants.gov.uk Dave Whittle david.whittle@hants.gov.uk Frank Fearn frank.fearn@hants.gov.uk Dave Dupont: david.dupont@hants.gov.uk Pauline Patterson: pauline.patterson@hants.gov.uk

More Related