1 / 37

Arguments for the existence of God

Arguments for the existence of God. Ontological Argument. Anselm. Ontological Argument. God (that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-conceived) by definition must be perfect. Perfect beings must exist, rather than be merely potential beings. Therefore, God must exist.

dominy
Télécharger la présentation

Arguments for the existence of God

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Arguments for the existence of God

  2. Ontological Argument Anselm

  3. Ontological Argument • God (that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-conceived) by definition must be perfect. • Perfect beings must exist, rather than be merely potential beings. • Therefore, God must exist.

  4. Objections to the argument • The first premise begs the question; it assumes God from the very beginning. • The second premise makes the dubious leap from the concept to the existence of God (Gaunilo - most perfect island). • The conclusion doesn’t necessarily prove the Christian God.

  5. Most perfect island

  6. Scriptural Support • Psalm 14:1(This is the reference Anselm used) • Genesis 1:1 (The Bible assumes, rather than seeking to prove, God’s existence) • Matthew 5:48 (God is perfect)

  7. CosmologicalArgument Thomas Aquinas

  8. Cosmological Argument • From MOTION to a PRIME MOVER • From CAUSATION to a FIRST CAUSE • From CONTINGENT BEINGS to a NECESSARY BEING • From IMPERFECTION to a PERFECT BEING • From evidence of PURPOSIVE DESIGN to a DIVINE DESIGNER

  9. THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CAN BE EXPRESSED IN EACH OF THE FIRST THREE WAYS.THE MORAL ARGUMENT IS SUGGESTED BY THE FOURTH WAY.AND THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN THE FIFTH WAY.

  10. MOTION TO PRIME MOVER

  11. CAUSATION TO A FIRST CAUSE • EVERY EFFECTS HAS A CAUSE (UNIVERSAL LAW OF CAUSATION). • THEREFORE CANNOT BE AN INFINITE REGRESSION OF CAUSES. • THEREFORE, THERE MUST BE A FIRST CAUSE

  12. CONTINGENT BEINGS TO A NECESSARY BEING • THERE IS AN EXPLANATION FOR THE EXISTENCE OF EVERY (CONTINGENT) THING. (THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON) • ALL THE WORLD IS MADE UP OF CONTINGENT THINGS. • THEREFORE, A NECESSARY BEING MUST EXIST TO ACCOUNT FOR THE WORLD’S EXISTENCE

  13. OBJECTIONS TO THE ARGUMENT • THE FIRST PREMISES CAN’T BE PROVEN. BOTHE THE UNIVERSAL LAW OF CAUSATION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON ARE ASSUMED RATHER THAN PROVEN. • THE SECOND PREMISES CAN BE CHALLENGED BY OTHER POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS, SUCH AS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION, A SUPERHUMAN CONTINGENT BEING, OR SEVERAL GODS. • THE CONCLUSIONS CONTRADICTS THE FIRST PREMISE.

  14. SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT • JOB 38:1-41:34 • PSALM 115:4-9 • ISAIAH 44:9-20 • ISAIAH 46:5-9 • JEREMIAH 10:1-10

  15. MoralArgument Immanuel Kant

  16. MORAL ARGUMENT • All (sane adult) people have a sense of morality. • All people fall short of their own moral standard of perfection • Immortality would be required in order to achieve this inherent human desire for imperfection and wholeness. • Therefore, God must exist in order to provide immortality.

  17. BETTER SUGGESTION • All (sane adult) people have a moral standard. • Moral standards are objective, not subjective. • Therefore, there must be a Supreme Moral Lawgiver.

  18. OBJECTIONS TO THE ARGUMENT • The first premise can be challenged by arguing that human moral consciousness comes from conditioned response, cultural conditioning, or evolutionary instinct. • The second premise can be challenged by asserting that moral standards are subjective. • The conclusion does not necessitate a deity.

  19. SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT • All Scriptures claiming a moral law, such as: • Romans 2:14-16 • Matthew 5:48 • Exodus 20:1-17

  20. TeleologicalArgument William Paley

  21. TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT • The universe (micro and macro) shows extensive evidence of purposive design. • Purposive design doesn’t happen by accident • Therefore, there must be a Divine Designer

  22. Paley’s Version

  23. Taylor’s Version

  24. OBJECTIONS TO THE ARGUMENT • Premise one can be challenged by pointing out disteleological elements (the problem of evil, storms, earthquakes, etc. • The second premise can be challenged by alternative explanations, such as the theory of evolution. • The conclusion does not prove the Christian God.

  25. Scriptural Support • Psalm 8:3 • Psalm 19:1-2 • Romans 1:20-23

  26. Argumentfrom experience William James

  27. Argument from experience • An event (miracle, salvation, sign, healing) is too extraordinary to be caused by natural events. • There must have been a supernatural cause. • Therefore, God must have caused the event.

  28. OBJECTIONS TO THE ARGUMENT • The first premise can be doubted, because other psychological and scientific causes can also explain the event when properly understood. • Other causes can be suggested for the second premise, such as natural causes that are unknown to the observer. • The conclusion does not prove the Christian God, because all world religions have claims of miracles, etc.

  29. Scriptural Support • 1 Kings 18 (Elijah calls down fire) • Acts 4:1-20 (Healing of lame beggar) • Acts 9:1-19 (Conversion of Paul)

  30. Personal Experience

  31. Pascal’sWager Blaise Pascal

  32. Pascal’s Wager

  33. Objections to Argument • This argument could be used by each world religion and cult

  34. Scriptural Support • Proverbs 16:25 • Malachi 3:10 • Matthew 7:24-27 • Luke 12:16-34 • Luke 16:19-30

More Related