1 / 25

The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST)

The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST). Part 1: TIST Project Background. Training Seminar for Projects July, 2005. T he I nternational S mall Group & T ree Planting Program. 25,000 smallholder farmers Empowered Small Groups Reforestation,

donelle-macadam
Télécharger la présentation

The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST) Part 1: TIST Project Background Training Seminar for Projects July, 2005

  2. The International Small Group & Tree Planting Program 25,000 smallholder farmers • Empowered Small Groups • Reforestation, • Conservation Farming, • Health Education (HIV/AIDS) • Tanzania (2000), India (2002), Uganda (2003), Kenya (2004)

  3. Living In Desolation

  4. TIST Participants: Choosing Change

  5. Transforming landscape to forest

  6. Small Groups Prepare Nurseries

  7. Trees line paths, shade houses, …

  8. ... & allow grass to grow.

  9. TIST Roles: The Small Group Registration Training Decision Making Nurseries Tree Planting Reporting Best Practices Bank Account

  10. The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST) Part 2: TIST Monitoring Systems & CDM Methodologies Training Seminar for Projects July, 2005

  11. TIST Monitoring SystemsUses latest technology, methods to best meet needs

  12. Keys to TIST Monitoring Systems • Years of hardware, software & methods development • Palm computers, GPS, synchronizations, website development, technologies to minimize training & ramp-up time • Thousands of site visits to groves = years of hard work • Transparency, Accuracy, Business Integrity • Transparency: simultaneous & public access to data from site visits • Accuracy: data tracked vs. data “reported” for various purposes… • Examples of items that change over time: • All groups vs. just active Small Groups • All groves vs. just CDM-only groves • All trees vs. just trees>1.73m • Integrity: hold some tons in reserve/won’t sell even up to the “accurate” # of tons… • Relevant to more than just CDM buyers: host country, development agencies, public, non-CDM buyers, etc.

  13. Results at www.tist.org

  14. Project Scenario:Location of Groves

  15. Project Scenario: Trees by Age & Species Cohort • Additional Info: • Tree Height • > 1.37m? • Diameter • allometric • Spacing/GPS • Grove size

  16. CDM Project Boundary: Groves • Groves, once established by SGs, define TIST project boundary • SGs report that they established a grove • TIST quantifiers visit grove, note tree counts by age & species cohort, GPS coords • Trees existing prior to start are excluded • TZ 2000 • IN 2002 • UG 2003 • KE 2004

  17. Baseline Methodology for Groves • Project boundary (groves) evolve over time • Multiple parts to TIST baseline study: • Area deforestation analysis (one-time) • From dialogue during initial participant training • Backed up by research from authoritative sources • Grove-specific site visits (initial + over time) • Visits within first 12 months to define boundary & note age & species by cohort • Repeat site visits: grove may fail to meet CDM or may expand with additional plantings each year

  18. Baseline Scenario • Conservatively estimated as 0 • No SG formation, no training (on tree-planting, CF, HIV/AIDS, SG BPs), no tree payment incentives, no SG bank accounts… • No tree nurseries, no holes dug in preparation, no tree transplanting from nurseries to holes • Continued deforestation

  19. Leakage • Conservatively estimated at 0: • Travel emissions • Between groves by quantifiers & project managers • Between US & host countries by project managers by US-based personnel • C sequestration outside groves • Fuelwood obtained from TIST plantings • More C sequestered outside TIST

  20. The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST) Part 3: CDM A/R Working Group Issues Raised Training Seminar for Projects July, 2005

  21. Project Boundary A/R WG Issues Groves, once established by SGs, define TIST project boundary • A/R WG: orchards near towns • arguably could be part of baseline scenario per A/R WG (suggest extra additionality screen) • A/R WG: add land eligibility screen • how to ensure no trees after 1989?

  22. Baseline Scenario for Groves • Conservative TIST Baseline: 0 carbon • no SG formation, no training (on tree-planting, CF, HIV/AIDS, SG BPs), no tree payment incentives, no bank accounts, • no tree nurseries, no tree planting, continued deforestation • A/R WG: ignored natural regeneration • Not explicitly addressed • Far outweighed by continued deforestation for fuelwood • A/R WG: include gross carbon sequestration in baseline • Cannot include carbon from gross tree plantings in project scenario. • Must account for fuelwood demand & mortality in project scenario to produce net C.

  23. Leakage Leakage conservatively estimated at 0 • A/R WG: • Delete benefit of fuelwood from within groves • Add impact of displaced agricultural activities

  24. Other A/R WG Recommendations • Stratify groves into climo-edaphic zones • Count only trees > 1.37m • Re-measure diameters of same trees each visit • Specify tree sampling across grove breadth • Apply allometric equations to each tree; then sum • Calculate 95% confidence intervals for C

  25. TIST Methodology Outcomes • Recommendations on changes to TIST methodologies • A/R WG, WB, CAAC, Others • TIST system modifications implemented across four countries (to address A/R WG recommendations) • Resubmission of improved/modified CDM methodologies for approval

More Related