1 / 59

District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan

District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan. Pro Walk/Pro Bike September 5, 2008. George Branyan Pedestrian Coordinator DC Department of Transportation. Presentation Agenda. Scope of the Plan Public involvement process Methodology Recommendations Implementation. 1. Scope of Work.

dong
Télécharger la présentation

District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan Pro Walk/Pro Bike September 5, 2008 George Branyan Pedestrian Coordinator DC Department of Transportation

  2. Presentation Agenda Scope of the Plan Public involvement process Methodology Recommendations Implementation

  3. 1. Scope of Work Key work tasks • Public involvement • Review existing policies and guidelines • Identify sidewalk deficiencies in neighborhoods • Identify priority pedestrian corridors; conduct detailed field analysis • Develop design guidelines and conduct training • Develop prioritized recommendations and a final plan

  4. 1. Public Involvement Varied approach to encourage participation from diverse groups • Technical Advisory Committee • Study website • Pedestrian survey (online) • Focus groups with key stakeholders • Corridor-based intercept surveys • Citywide public meeting • Follow up public meetings

  5. Pedestrian Survey Results • Available online (and paper versions) for two months • Broad participation – over 4,800 responses (self-selected) • Gather information on: • Walking habits • Critical issues for pedestrians in DC • Priorities for improvements • Specific destinations and roadways in need of improvements

  6. Wisconsin Ave Public Involvement • Key concerns: • Unsafe street crossings / intersections • Construction blocking sidewalks • Motorist behavior • Poor sidewalk surface quality and maintenance • Safety on major corridors • Accessibility • Personal safety while walking

  7. Online Survey Results

  8. Online Survey Results

  9. Public Involvement The most frequently cited corridors needing improvements for pedestrians include: • Connecticut Ave • Wisconsin Ave • 14th Street • Massachusetts Ave • New York Ave • Florida Ave

  10. 2. Review Existing Policies and Guidelines Policies that affect comfort along the roadway: • Driveway width & Access Management • Sidewalks • Tree boxes & furnishing area Policies that affect safety crossing the roadway: • Crosswalks: • Marking and design • Intersections Treatments: • Signage • Signal timing • Restrictions • Push buttons • Uncontrolled crossing treatments: • Signage • Physical changes • Beacons & special signals • School Zones • WMATA bus stop design guidelines/practices

  11. 3. Neighborhood Sidewalk Deficiencies • Identification of sidewalk gaps for entire network of roads in the District

  12. Neighborhood Sidewalk Deficiencies

  13. 4. Priority Pedestrian Study Areas • Select priority corridors • Locations with most people and worst conditions • 8 corridors were analyzed • Field analysis of priority corridors • Existing conditions • Key deficiencies for walking along the road and crossing the road • Concept recommendations

  14. Identifying Priority Pedestrian Study Areas • Pedestrian Potential Index: Locations with high levels of pedestrian activity • Population and Employment Density • Roadways near: • Metro stations and bus stops • Schools, colleges/universities • Shopping destinations • Major park entrances • Senior centers • Tourist & special event destinations (convention center)

  15. Identifying Priority Pedestrian Study Areas • Pedestrian Deficiency Index: Locations with poor conditions for pedestrians • Roadways with: • Sidewalk gaps • Narrow sidewalks (under 4’ or 5’ wide) • Higher traffic volumes (ADT) • Higher posted speed limit • Lack of planting strip • Lack of street trees • Higher number of vehicle travel lanes • Lack of median island • Longer distance between signalized intersection

  16. Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalk:

  17. Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations:

  18. Uncontrolled crossing index

  19. Uncontrolled crossing index

  20. Uncontrolled crossing index

  21. High-risk uncontrolled marked crosswalks on Piney Branch & GA Ave.

  22. Priority Pedestrian Study Areas

  23. Priority Pedestrian Study Corridors

  24. Analyzing Priority Pedestrian Study Areas • 2.Where is the most difficult place to cross the road along 16th Street? • Irving (31) • Harvard (22) • New Hampshire (19) • U Street (14) • Columbia (11) • Florida (2) • Beekmon Place • Kalorama • Girard • Spring Cave • George • K Street WARD 1 – 16th Street Date: June 12, 2007; Time: 9:00 AM Weather: Sunny (about 80 degrees) Surveys Completed: 98 1. What is the primary purpose of your walk today? (check one) (44) To access transit (metro station or bus stop) (15) To go to work (16) To go shopping, run errands (05) To go to a restaurant/movies/other entertainment (05) To visit friends, go to the gym, etc. (05) For exercise only (01) To go to school (07) Other: Sell papers, On vacation, Walk dog, Move car

  25. Analyzing Priority Pedestrian Study Areas • 3. Why is it difficult to cross at that location? (check all that apply) Missing or poorly maintained curb ramps (30) Other: Accidents (3) • Light is to long (8) • Very congested (3) • Lights favor cars • Rush hour • Hard to get on and off of bus • Confusing (5) • Lights do not coincide with each other (2) • Angle on New Hampshire is odd and catches people off guard • North corner of New Hampshire needs a stop sign/no turn on red sign (36) Drivers’ behavior (failing to yield to pedestrians, speeding, running red lights and stop signs) (15) Traffic signal is not long enough for me to cross (13) No crosswalks (04) No traffic light to stop cars (03) Lack of personal safety (from crime) (08) Crossing distance is too long (01) No median island (or refuge)

  26. 4. Design Guidelines and Training • Pedestrian Design Guidelines • New and innovative tools for pedestrian safety • Details to illustrate appropriate design measures for pedestrians • Training • Two training sessions for DDOT staff • Best practice pedestrian design and construction guidelines • Tailored to the District

  27. Major design recommendations to meet national best practices • Crosswalk Marking Policy • Based on Zegeer Study (2002) and Boulder, CO Research (2006), and VDOT policy • Requires enhancements for multi-lane arterials with high volumes • Advance Stop Lines on multi-lane arterials at: • Uncontrolled marked crosswalks • Rapid Flash Beacon marked crosswalks • Pedestrian Hybrid Signal marked crosswalks • Uncontrolled Crosswalk Side-of-Street Sign (Boulder, CO and MDSHA) • Rapid Flash Beacons (St. Petersburg, FL and Boulder, CO) • Pedestrian Hybrid Signals (Tucson, AZ) • Far Side Bus Stops (Arlington, VA and Portland, OR) • Pedestrian Refuge Islands • Curb Extensions • Leading Pedestrian Interval Signal Timing

  28. Uncontrolled Crosswalk Matrix

  29. Advance Stop Lines: Multiple threat crash problem 1st car stops to let pedestrian cross 1st carmasks 2nd car, which doesn’t stop, hits pedestrian at high speed

  30. Multiple threat crash solution Advance stop/yield line 1st car stops further back 1st car no longer masks 2nd car, which can be seen by pedestrian

  31. Advance Stop Lines at uncontrolled crosswalks

  32. Proposed Side of Street Crosswalk Sign

  33. Enhanced Uncontrolled Crosswalk Rapid Flash Crosswalk Beacon For use at selected crosswalks on collector and minor arterial streets

  34. Enhanced Uncontrolled Crosswalk on major arterial Pedestrian Hybrid Signal For Use at selected currently uncontrolled crosswalks on major arterial streets. Pedestrian-activated signal

  35. Pedestrian Hybrid Signal Major roadway gets traffic signal. Minor roadway keeps stop sign but gets pedestrian signal. Minor roadway doesn’t get cut through traffic.

  36. Curb Extensions Source: Toole Design Group

  37. Source: Toole Design Group Curb Extensions Source: Richard Drdul

  38. Importance of Reducing Speed A pedestrian’s chance of death if hit by a motor vehicle 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 20mph 30mph 40mph Killing Speed and Saving Lives, UK Department of Transportation

  39. Bus Stop Placement • Current DC practice is on the near side of an intersection • Requires a longer no parking zone (100-120 ft) • Bus “hides” pedestrian crossing in front of bus • Right turning vehicles can cut off bus • Bus can get stuck at red light adding time to the trip • Best practice is on the far side of an intersection • Requires a shorter no parking zone (50-80 ft) • Pedestrian crossing behind bus • Right turning vehicles are not an issue • Bus is on the other side of light saving time for the trip • Best, Best practice is curb extended bus stop!

  40. Farside generally preferred at intersections because: • Driver can pull across intersection before light turns red • Nearside can mean waiting an extra signal cycle • Farside increases likelihood that pedestrians will cross behind bus Bus driver concern: farside or nearside stops? Farside = patrons cross behind Nearside = patrons cross in front

  41. On streets with permanent on-street parking, “bus bulbout” saves parking spots. These two spots would be prohibited if bus has to pull up to curb line.

More Related