New S tate significant assessment system

1. New State significant assessment system for EPLA Marcus Ray Executive Director Assessment Systems & General Counsel October 2011

2. Implementation: Repeal of Part 3A Environmental Planning & Assessment Amendment (Part 3A Repeal) Act 2011 commenced 1 October 2011 New State & Regional Development SEPP 2011 exhibition from 18 August 2011 until 2 September 2011 EP&A Regulation amendments Savings and Transitionals

3. SRD SEPP - Consultation 65 submissions were received, including: • 10 from government agencies • 23 from local councils • 13 from industry groups and associations (including the EDO and LGSA) • 19 from other stakeholders (individuals, business and the Greens) 32 changes to the SEPP made State significant classes remain similar to those set out June 2011 policy statement. All submissions are on the Department’s website.

4. SRD SEPP - classes & sites • State significant development • 24 classes • 18 sites + NSW Housing sites • State significant infrastructure • carried out by public authority development who would also be a determining authority & would require an EIS • 6 other classes • 4 projects and 1 concept plan transitioned from Part 3A • Critical infrastructure • Pacific Highway, North West Rail Link, Light Rail extension

5. MD SEPP >>> SRD SEPP - 1 • About 50% less projects than Part 3A • Residential, retail and commercial, and coastal subdivision classes removed • Marinas excluded • Employment excluded as criteria for SSD • Most CIV thresholds standardised at $30M • All $5M thresholds (ESASS) increased to $10M

6. MD SEPP >>> SRD SEPP - 2 • Medical centres added to Hospitals • Distribution and storage facilities • criteria $30M > $50M • requires facilities to be on contiguous sites • Tourist, convention and entertainment facilities • new clause ‘Cultural and Sporting Facilities’ with CIV at $30M • new clause ‘Other Tourist Related Facilities’ to capture remainder, and retains CIV for those at $100M. • Research facilities added to educational establishments

7. MD SEPP >>> SRD SEPP - sites • Developed sites removed • Generally CIV threshold raised from $5m - $10m. • North Penrith and North Ryde Station Precinct - principal subdivisions • Royal Randwick Racecourse (10 m + all non-race day events) • Housing NSW sites

8. SSD: Key features 1 • Builds on existing Part 4 of the EP&A Act • SSD requires development consent under an EPI • Section 79C assessment • must consider all SEPPs & LEPs in making a decision • SEPP 1 applies • Development Control Plans do not apply (SRD SEPP) • Local infrastructure contributions apply • ss94 or 94A • Can determine partially prohibited development

9. SSD: Key features 2 Call-in for prohibited development Concurrent rezoning Broad power to modify proposal in assessment To mitigate impacts by redesign Other approvals not required or must be issued consistently: ss89I & 89J (former ss75U & 75V) except aquifer interference Water Management Act 2000 Applicant and objector appeals & s123 review No appeals if public hearing Public meeting is not a public hearing.

10. SSD: Assessment 1 • Benchmark • 85% applications determined within 4 months of start of exhibition • Pre-lodgement: • EP&A Regulation include requirements for request for Director General’s Requirements (DGRs) • Online request • Consultation with councils & relevant agencies - 14 days to respond • 28 days for DP&I to issue DGRs • Extended period for planning focus meeting • DGRs refer to relevant guidelines • Standard DGRs

12. SSD: Assessment 2 • Environmental Impact Statement preparation • responds to DGRs • addresses the principles in Schedule 2 EP&A Regulation 2000, as required • applicant prepares EIS in consultation with community, council and relevant agencies • Lodgement: • Comply with schedule 1 of the EP&A Regulation 2000 • DA for SSD lodged with EIS • no adequacy test • 28 days from the lodgement for DP&I to stop the clock for more information

13. SSD: Assessment 3 • Exhibition • minimum 30 day exhibition period (45 days for school holidays) • councils & agencies notified during exhibition • 90 day deemed refusal period • DP&I may request response to submissions • may amend proposal in response to submissions – limited requirement to re-exhibit if reduce impacts • Assessment report • Section 79C + DGRs • DP&I Website • DGRs, EIS, all submissions & reports

14. SSI: Key features • SSI must be development that: • does not need consent under a SEPP, and • carried out by a public authority requiring an EIS • Other approvals not required or must be issued consistently: ss115ZG & 115ZH (former ss75U & 75V) • except aquifer interference Water Management Act 2000 • EPIs don’t apply to assessment • No merit appeals but s123 review • No change • Critical State Significant Infrastructure

15. SSI: Assessment 1 • Benchmark • Same as SSD • Lodgement: • Online • Application • Director General Requirements (DGRs): • Same as SSD, • except no standard DGRs, but model DGRs • Environmental Impact Statement preparation • Same as SSD

16. SSI: Assessment 2 • Environmental Impact Statement lodgement • no adequacy test – same as SSD • Exhibition • Same as SSD except: • DP&I may request Preferred Infrastructure Report • 90 days for completion of DG’s report from end of exhibition • Assessment report • DG’s report against DGRs • DP&I Website • DGRs, EIS, all submissions & reports

17. SSD & SSI: Determination • Minister delegates determination to: • Planning Assessment Commission • projects by private proponents • political donation statement lodged • where relevant council objects • Minister determines: • Public authority projects • DP&I • projects less than 25 objections by members of public

18. PAC Determinations PAC adopts new procedures 5 September 2011 DG report published on DP&I webpage before Meetings with DP&I, local council & applicant Public meetings before determination Depending on number of objections Applicant to respond to questions at meeting Public meeting is not a public hearing May request further information before determining

19. Part 3A Projects: Transitional Provisions Part 3A projects + concept plans completed as Part 3A if DGRs issued when Act commences If DGRs not issued when Act commences: if the project is SSD then an application for SSD will be processed Part 3A approvals, including concept plans, will be modified under Part 3A Critical infrastructure projects under Part 3A will remain critical infrastructure

20. Regional panels • Over 50% DAs now be determined by Council • subdivisions over 250 lots - removed • $10m - $20m - removed • $10m – $20m - referral after 120 daysunless applicant delay • coastal developments – smaller developments removed • designated – extractive industries, waste facilities & marinas • Savings & transitionals - in Schedule 6A of the Act

21. SSD: proposed call-in procedure • Proponent requests – DP&I consults council & reports to PAC. • PAC advises Minister on State & regional planning significance • Minister determines if call-in. • All documents available on web

22. SSD Call-in – proposed State & regional significance criteria • strategic consistency & importance • major public benefits • significant environmental, social or economic impacts • significant economic benefit to a region, the State or the national economy • geographic scale • complexity, uniqueness or requirement for specialist assessment • other relevant matters 

23. Implementation • Proponent’s SSD/SSI checklist • SSD & SSI flow charts • Planning circulars • Fact Sheets • Regional Panel checklist + referral template • Notification Policy • Call – in guideline

24. New State significant assessment system Marcus Ray Executive Director Assessment Systems & General Counsel October 2011