1 / 17

Prospects for untriggered di-hadron correlations in Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV collisions…

Prospects for untriggered di-hadron correlations in Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV collisions…. Anthony Timmins for the ALICE collaboration. Outline…. Untriggered di-hadron correlations… Correlation function… Fit decomposition… Results at RHIC… What can the LHC bring? Progress report from ALICE… Summary….

donny
Télécharger la présentation

Prospects for untriggered di-hadron correlations in Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV collisions…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Prospects for untriggered di-hadron correlations in Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV collisions… Anthony Timmins for the ALICE collaboration

  2. Outline… • Untriggered di-hadron correlations… • Correlation function… • Fit decomposition… • Results at RHIC… • What can the LHC bring? • Progress report from ALICE… • Summary…

  3. Untriggered di-hadron correlations… Au+Au 200 GeV • Untriggered correlations provide map of bulk correlation structures: • Look at all pairs over all pT • Number of physical mechanisms contribute in heavy-ion collisions • Main contributors at RHIC energies: • Elliptic flow • Shows up as cos (2) structure…. • “Soft ridge” • Shows up as elongated nearside 2D Gaussian..   arXiv:0806.2121 (STAR)

  4. Correlation function…STAR definition • “Auto-correlation” based on Pearson’s coefficient… • sib signal +background (real events), • ref background (mixed events) • Designed to be independent of multiplicity • R the same for p+p and Pb+Pb if Pb+Pb is superposition of p+p • Measures# of correlated pairs per particle

  5. JHEP 1009:091,2010 (CMS) Correlation function…CMS vs STAR • Prefactor only thing that differs: • CMS: Mean number of tracks - 1 • STAR: Mean number of tracks per  width per  with M arXiv:0806.2121 (STAR)

  6. Correlation function…Evolution with centrality • Change in Cu+Cu correlation structure with centrality… • p+p like in peripheral collisions • Correlations become stronger.. • Nearside gaussian structure widens… arXiv:0910.5938v1 (STAR)

  7. Fit decomposition… Nearside 2D Gaussian Soft ridge Sharp exponential HBT, e+e- Awayside Not directed flow v2 Elliptic flow   arXiv:0806.2121 (STAR)

  8. Fit decomposition… arXiv:0806.2121 (STAR) • Fits generally good • Residuals show no structure… Sharp exponential Nearside 2D gaussian Awayside v2

  9. Results at RHIC…2D Nearside Gaussian arXiv:0806.2121 (STAR) • Gaussian gets amplitude grows, gets wider in  • Quantitative characterisation of “soft ridge” Peak η Width Peak φ Width Peak Amplitude Au+Au 200 GeV Au+Au 62 GeV  = 2Nbin/Npart

  10. Results at RHIC…Is the wide Gaussian due to v3? • Including v3 in fit depletes Gaussian Amplitude and  width: • Doesn’t kill Gaussian though… Peak Amplitude Peak η Width C De Silva (STAR) RBRC workshop Cu+Cu 200 GeV STAR Preliminary

  11. Results at RHIC…Soft ridge theories • Initial energy density fluctuations • P. Mishra et.al, Phys. Rev. C 77 (064902) 2008 • B. Alver and G. Roland, arXiv:1003.0194 • P Sorensen, arXiv:1101.1925v1 • CGC flux tubes + radial flow model • Gavin, McLerran and Moschelli: Phys. Rev. C79 (2009) 051902 • Moschelli and Gavin: Nucl.Phys.A836:43-58,2010 • Medium modified mini-jets (pQCD related explanation) • T. Trainor and D. Kettler, arXiv:1008.4759 • T. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 044901 • List not exhaustive….

  12. Results at RHIC…Soft ridge theories • Descriptions give quantitative predictions for nearside Gaussian amplitude (A1) • CGC + radial flow on left • Initial energy density fluctuations on right… arXiv:1101.1925v1 Phys.Rev. C 79 (2009) 051902

  13. What can the LHC bring? • New energy, new physics, possibly new correlation structures… • Previous “soft ridge” descriptions capable of LHC predictions: • Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV data provides essential constraints.. • Easy for many theories to fit one dataset • Hard for one theory to fit many datasets P Sorensen, PC G Moschelli & S Gavin, PC

  14. Progress report from ALICE… • Events • Online trigger cut loose • Background reject offline • |PVz| < 5 cm • 2 million events after all cuts • Subset of total possible… • Tracks • pT > 0.15 GeV/c • || < 0.8 • Various quality cuts… • Initial studies underway: • Di-hadron correlation group meets biweekly • Selection criteria for “first look” at untriggered correlations in Pb+Pb

  15. ALICE performance Progress report from ALICE… • Pronounced change in correlationstructure from peripheral -> central Pb+Pb collisions • STAR definition adopted • Total correlations become stronger • Nearside more elongated in …

  16. Progress report from ALICE… • Centrality evolution: • Nearside Gaussian gets gradually wider… • v2 rises and falls… ALICE performance

  17. Summary… • “First look” at untriggered di-hadron correlations in Pb+Pb 2.76 TeV: • Rapid change in correlation structure from peripheral -> central… • Emergence of the soft ridge at the LHC… • Future work: • Obtain more events, finer centrality binning… • Fit decomposition • Plan to use RHIC functions initially • Multi-parameter fits challenging • Systematic uncertainties on parameters need to well understood…. • Things look very promising…

More Related