1 / 97

Hadron Physics at the B Factories

Hadron Physics at the B Factories. Brian Meadows University of Cincinnati. Outline. B Factories and Hadron Studies Charm meson spectroscopy Charm Baryons Charmonium and Double Charmonium Summary and Discussion Dalitz Plots ???. B Factory Luminosities.

wade-garza
Télécharger la présentation

Hadron Physics at the B Factories

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hadron Physics at the B Factories Brian Meadows University of Cincinnati Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati.

  2. Outline • B Factories and Hadron Studies • Charm meson spectroscopy • Charm Baryons • Charmonium and Double Charmonium • Summary and Discussion • Dalitz Plots ??? Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  3. B Factory Luminosities Peak luminosity 1.001034 cm–2s–1 Integrated luminosity 299 fb–1 Peak luminosity 1.581034 cm–2s–1 Integrated luminosity 488 fb–1 e+ e- (3.1 x 9.0 GeV/c) e+ e- (3.5 x 8.0 GeV/c) 1 fb-1 ~1.1M BB events Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  4. BaBar and Belle e+ (3.5 GeV/c) e- (8 GeV/c) • Main purpose: Study CP violation in asymmetric e+e- (4S)  BB • A major difference between the two detectors is the PID system: • Babar: Dirc ring imaging C • Belle: TOF and Threshold C with aerogel v v Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  5. Fixed Target Experiments Too?Penta-Quark Searches BaBar Belle e-NK 0p Vertices • hep-ex/0507014: • (1540)/(1520) < 2.5% (90% CL) No (1540) pentaquark signal seen: Preliminary e- Be e- Be M (K0p) (GeV/c2) M (K0p) (GeV/c2) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  6. (Non-B) Hadrons at B Factories? • Cross sections are large Can use “off peak” data • Very high statistics (~1.4 x 106D’s / fb-1). • Also • Relatively small combinatorial backgrounds in e+e- interactions. • Good particle ID. • Detection of all possible final states including neutrals. • Good tracking and vertexing On Off ECM (GeV) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  7. Hadrons - Friends or Foes? • Hadrons may get in the way of the “really interesting” quark/lepton interactions, but they can also aid in understanding them … … for example, in finding the CKM angles … Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  8. PRD 71: 032005 (2005) 89 fb-1 CKM Angle  and Hadrons • To measure sin 2β - the golden channel is B0 J/Ks • Leads to a four-fold ambiguity in the determination of the angle β. • Babar used B 0 J/K-+ to find sign of cos 2 • An amplitude analysis was made of the K-+ system to determine the relative phase between S- and P-wave contributions to the decay • A clear choice agrees with the LASS data Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  9. M 2+ M 2+ M 2- M 2- CKM Angle g from Direct CP Violationin B§D 0K§ =rb ei ( B§ )x § K0+- § § K0+- § • Angle  relates the two decays B- D 0K-andB-  D 0K- • SupposeD0(D 0) K-(K 0) +- • If CP conserved in D0 decay, Dalitz plot for D0 is identical except that+  - • The final states are indistinguishable • So, the two Dalitz plots interfere Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  10. PRL 95: 121802 (2005) and hep-ex/0504039 205 fb-1 D0 K0+- Dalitz Plot Analysis • Use large available sample of D0 from e+e- cc continuum to determine the Dalitz plot density for D 0 • Two models used: • “Breit-Wigner Isobar model” Requires 13 resonances including “(500)” and “(1000)” • K-matrix model (fit shown) better way to describe the  S-wave – no ’s needed Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  11. DsJ Mesons Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  12. Heavy-Light Systems 2jqLJ  JP • Narrow statesare easy to find. • Two wide states are harder. • Since charm quark is not infinitely heavy, some jq=1/2, 3/2 mixing can occur between the two JP=1+ states. jq = 3/2 2+ small 3P2 D-wave large 1+ 1P1 S-wave L = 1 1+ 3P1 small D-wave jq = 1/2 1P0 0+ large S-wave tensor spin-orbit jq = 1/2 1- small 1S1 L = 0 small 0- 1S0 Expected by quark models To be below D(*)K threshold Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  13. The Ds(2317) and Ds(2460)see PRL 90, 242001 (2003) • When Antimo Palano studied the Ds0 system he found a huge, unexpected peak. There is no signal from Ds+ sidebands. The Ds*!Ds+0 signal is clear too. How did CLEO miss it?! CLEO had discarded All these events. Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  14. hep-ex/0507064 350 fb-1 Mixing in the JP = 1+DsJ(2460) / Ds1(2536) • Belle has analyzed Ds1(2536) decays to D*K to look for an S-wave component. • (In the limit the c quark has infinite mass, the narrow states would decay in pure D-wave) • Angular distribution of + in D*+ system leads to the limits 0.277 < S/(S+D) < 0.955 Indicative of some mixing First time these modes are seen Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  15. New Results onDsJ(*) in e+e− ccfrom Babar hep-ex/0408067 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  16. p(0) > 400 MeV/c, E > 135 MeV DsJ*(2317)+ Ds+0-g Ds*(2112)+ Ds+  + g Ds+ 0 invariant mass (GeV/c2) 125 fb-1 hep-ex/0408067 Ds+0 Final States • Clear peak from DsJ(2460)+ • DsJ(2460)+ decays entirely through channel Ds*(2112)+ 0 m(Ds+0)= 2.46 GeV/c2 Requires multi-channel analysis DsJ(2460)+: 292  29 events Mass: 2459.1  1.3  1.2 MeV/c2 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  17. 125 fb-1 hep-ex/0408067 Ds+0 Final States p*(Ds+0) > 3.2 GeV/c p(0) > 400 MeV/c • Clear peak from DsJ*(2317)+ DsJ(2460) “-g” Ds*(2112) “+g” No DsJ(2460)+ Ds+0 DsJ*(2317)+: 1275  45 events Mass: (2318.9  0.3  0.9) MeV/c2 Ds+0 invariant mass (GeV/c2) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  18. 125 fb-1 hep-ex/0408067 Ds+ Final States p*(Ds+) > 3.2 GeV/c E > 500 MeV Clear peak from DsJ(2460)+ DsJ(2460)+: 509  46 events Mass: 2457.2  1.6  1.3 MeV/c2 DsJ(2460)+ Ds*(2112)+ Ds+ Reflection Background subtracted Ds+  invariant mass (GeV/c2) Compatible with DsJ*(2317)+ JP =0+ Excludes JP=0+ for Ds*(2460)+ Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  19. 125 fb-1 hep-ex/0408067 Ds++ - Final States p() > 250 MeV/c Ds1(2536)+ Clear peaks for both JP=1+ candidates: DsJ(2460)+andDs1(2536)+ DsJ(2460)+ DsJ(2460)+: 67  11 events Mass: 2460.1  0.3  1.2 MeV/c2 Ds+ + - invariant mass (GeV/c2) I-spin conserved BUT OZI suppressed Forbidden for DsJ*(2317)+ JP =0+ Excludes JP=0+ for Ds*(2460)+ Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  20. 125 fb-1 hep-ex/0408067 Ds+± Final States • Test the 4 quark hypothesis for DsJ*(2317)+ and DsJ*(2460)+: • Might expect neutral and doubly-charged partners with similar masses • Look in Ds+± to test this possibility Ds+- p() > 300 MeV/c PRD 68, 054006 Ds++ Neither is seen No clear evidence for exotic nature p() > 300 MeV/c Ds+ ± invariant mass (GeV/c2) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  21. DsJ(*) in B decays Advantages of exclusive reconstruction: • Kinematic constraints • Backgrounds reduced • Measure of branching fractions • Measure spin of resonances Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  22. PRL 93, 181801 113 fb-1 B  DsJD(*) Decay Signals • Sum of the 4 B modes: Clear signals in 3 DsJ* modes Yield = 88  17 m(DsJ*) = 2317.2  1.3 Yield = 112  14 m(DsJ) = 2458.9  1.5 Yield = 139  17 m(DsJ) = 2461.1  1.6 m(DsJ(*)+) (GeV/c2) MES (GeV/c2) Fit result 1 candidate per event m(DsJ(*)) sidebands Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  23. Values of the branching fractions for the 12 modes: = 0.274 ± 0.045 ± 0.020 Good agreement with prediction (5.08/21.05=0.245) from Bardeen, Eichten, Hill, PRD 68, 054024 (2003) PRL 93, 181801 113 fb-1 Results Comparable to B D* modes! Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  24. PRL 93, 181801 113 fb-1 Helicity Analysis • Two body decay BDDsJ forces DsJ to be aligned (if it is not a scalar) • Use low background mode: B  DsJ(2460)+ D, DsJ(2460)+  Ds+ • 5 m(Ds) fits for different cos h regions • Good agreement with JP = 1+ J = 1 J = 2 DsJ(2460)+ DsJ  h B Ds D Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  25. hep-ex/0507064 350 fb-1 B DsJK and B DsJ • B 0 Ds(J)K - is especially interesting none of the final state quarks (cuss) are in the initial B (bd) meson. • Decay ofB 0 DsK –has been measured(3.8 § 1.0) x 10-5(average of Babar and Belle) • B 0 Ds(J)- is expected to be small. Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  26. B0 DsJ(2317)+K - Compare these with Br{B0 Ds+K-} = (5.1 ± 1.3) x 10-5 (average of Babar and Belle) B0 DsJ(2460)+K - Naively expect them to be the ~ same C.-H. Chen, H.-n Li, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054002 (2004) -0.11 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  27. Selex reported the observation of a new narrow charm-strange meson : the D+sJ (2632)→ D+s, D0K+ SELEX: Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:242001 (2004) Search for DsJ(2632) N(Ds+) = 544  29 N(h) = 5087  863 uncorrelated h SELEX Ds+h D0K+ SELEX Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  28. hep-ex/0408087 126 fb-1 Search for DsJ(2632) BaBar sees no evidence for production of DsJ(2632) inDs+h , D0K+norD*+K0sin 126 fb-1 of data N(Ds+) = 196000 N(h) = 3900 correlated h Ds2(2573)+ Ds1(2536)+ Ds+h D0K+ D*K0 p* > 4.0 GeV/c D0K- Fit after 2D bckg subtr. Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  29. Charm Baryons Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  30. hep-ex/0507011 230 fb-1 Decay Branching Ratios of c • Clear c0 signals are seen in - + and -K-++ decay modes • Hyperon events are reconstructed in the decay chains - --  K -  p -  p - Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  31. hep-ex/0507011 230 fb-1 Production of c Kinematic region allowed for B decay First evidence for c in B decay Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  32. hep-ex/0507011 230 fb-1 Decay Branching Ratios of c • c0 signals are seen in - K+ and -+ decay modes (c0 - K+ ) / (c0 -+)= 0.294 ± 0.018 (stat) ± 0.016 (sys) Previous Best: 0.50 ± 0.21 (stat) ± .05 (sys) (9 evs CLEO) -+ -K+ Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  33. Production of c0 On-resonance 0c in B decay Off-resonance PRL 95:142003 (2005) 116 fb-1 B(Bc0X) × B(c0−+) = (2.11 ± 0.19 ± 0.25) × 10−4 (e+e-c0X) × B(c0−+) = (388 ± 39 ± 41) fb at 10.58 GeV/c2 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  34. hep-ex/0507009 232 fb-1 Precision Measurement of c Mass • Important measurement • most charm baryon masses measured relative to this • Method: • Choose decay modes with small Q-value/large BR: c K+Ks0and0K+Ks0 • Estimate / adjust major systematic uncertainties in: • Material audit – determine  and K0 mass vs. decay path length • Magnetic field – determine  and K0 mass vs. momentum in lab. • Much larger control samples: • c+ pK-+ 1.5 x 106 evs. • c+  pK0 2.4 x 105 evs. Q = 177.8 MeV/c2 4627§ 84 events Q = 100.9 MeV/c2 264§ 20 events Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  35. Combined measurement : m(Lc) = 2286.46  0.14 MeV/c2 hep-ex/0507009 232 fb-1 Results Large Q • Most precise measurement of charm mass to date • Approximately 4 x more precise than Current PDG value: 2284.9 § 0.6 MeV/c2 and about 2.5  higher Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  36. hep-ex/0507011 125 fb-1 Some Branching Fractions of c+ • Most decay branching ratios in the PDG have typically 40% uncertainties • Few Cabbibo suppressed rates observed are p (CLEO), 0K+ and K+ (Belle) • Babar has new measurements on several Cabbibo suppressed modes with uncertainties at the ~10% level •  modes are normalized to + and 0 modes to 0+ modes c+ + c+0+ c+ 0+ Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  37. Results : Ratios of Branching Fractions with Respect to CF C+ + Cabibbo-suppressed Cabibbo-allowed In PDG ratios of Branching Fractions are with respect to  C+ pK-+ Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  38. PRL 94, 122002, 2005 350 fb-1 p Observation of New Sc Triplet Tentative assignment to JP = 3/2 - Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  39. Scanning the e+e- Energy Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  40. New Parameters for the . • JPC=1-- resonances can be probed using formation processes e+e- g*  X Can measure MX, GX, line shape and e+e- coupling • Results from PEP2 beam energy scans: PRD in press (hep-ex/040525) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  41. ISR Studies • Wider energy range covered by capitalizing on ISR: Reconstruct the ISRphoton Energy E*angle wrt e- *in e+e- CMS • Good point-to-point systematics • Poorer resolution on energy scale • R must still be JPC=1-- • Cross-section measured as fn of s0=mR2: R Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  42. ISR Production of pp Pairs • The reaction e+e- gISRg*  ppISRis used to provide information on the electric and magnetic moments of the produced pp system. • For * >> me / \/s • The pp cross-section is where Magnetic Electric form-factor Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  43. Preliminary 240 fb-1 Proton Form-Factor (FF) Very strong variation near threshold confirmed • For comparison with previous measurements, |GE| ¼ |GM| is assumed. • FF and  (e+ e- pp) measured from threshold to 4.5 GeV/c2 • Extending range of previous measurements • Covers several decades • Excellent point-to-point precision • Observe clear dips at ~2.25 and at ~3 GeV/c2 • Dips also seen in cross-section  (e+ e- pp). pQCD predicts fall off /s(s’)/s’2 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  44. Preliminary 240 fb-1 E/M Ratio RG = |GE|/|GM| p • Most previous measurements assumed RG = 1.0 • Babar results clearly show: • RG > 1.0 at low mass • RG» 1.0 above 2.5 GeV/c2 p pp in e+e- CMS GE GM cos p Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  45. Charmonium & Double Charmonium Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  46. Charmonium B-factories have made major contributions to understanding of the cc system: • Below DD threshold one of two missing statesc0(21S0) was found by Belle in B decay, confirmed by Babar in 2 interactions At 3630 – about 40 MeV/c2 above where it was formerly thought to be • Above DD threshold there are five, new states, some of which are puzzling X(3872), X(3940), Y(3940), Z(3930), Z(4260) • Also find evidence for mysterious large X-section for production of double charmonium Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  47. Double Charmonium Production Study double charmonium in e+e- annihilation }C=-1 }C=+1 c , c , c(2S) J/, (2S) Theorists Predict the cross sections of the two processes to be compatible G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten & J. Lee PRD67, 054023 (2003) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  48. hc cc0 hc(2S) 155 fb-1 Double Charmonium Production e+e- J/ + Mrecoil • Originally seen by Belle with 45 fb -1 sample Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 142001 (2002). • Confirmed by BaBar at 124 fb -1 Phys.Rev.D72:031101 (2005). • BaBar also Measure M = mc(1S) - mc(1S) = 660.2§ 6.8-7.6+7.1 MeV/c2 • No evidence for e+e-  J/ J/ production in either experiment Phys.Rev.D72:031101 (2005) 124 fb-1 Phys.Rev.D70:071102,2004 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  49. Theoretical Comparison with Babar/Belle • Babar and Belle measure s(e+e- J/y cc) xB(cc  > 2 charged hadrons) NOTE – theoretical calculations do not include Br for decay to 2 charged tracks Phys.Rev.D70:071102,2004 Belle finds angular distributions also favour single * and dis-favour color singlet cc gg production S.J. Brodsky, A.S. Goldhaber and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 112001 (2003) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

  50. Belle also observes e+e- (2S) + cc • Cross-sections are similar to those for J/ + cc • No evidence for e+e-y(2S) + cc (C=-1) either hc cc0 hc(2S) 155 fb-1 Phys. Rev.,D70, 071102 (2004) Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati

More Related