1 / 50

Rare decays at B factories

Rare decays at B factories. Peter Kri ž an University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute. Fundamental Questions in Flavor Physics. Are there n ew sources of CP v iolation ? Experiments: b s CPV, compare CPV angles from tree and loops

floria
Télécharger la présentation

Rare decays at B factories

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rare decays at B factories Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute ITEP Meeting

  2. Fundamental Questions in Flavor Physics Are there new sources of CP violation? Experiments: bs CPV, compare CPV angles from tree and loops Are there new operators with quarks enhanced by New Physics ? Experiments: AFB(BK*l l), BK rates and asymmetries Are there right-handed currents ? Experiments: bs CPV, BV V triple-product asymmetries Are there new flavor changing neutral currents ? Experiments: bsννbar, D-Dbar mixing+CPV+rare, τγ Data sample of ∼50ab−1@Y(4S) needed to address these questions ITEP Meeting

  3. Contents • FCNC bs decays • bsg : inclusive rate, CP violation • bd penguins:B rg, wgdecays • Measurement of Afb vs q2 in B  K* l+ l- decays • Decays with >1 neutrino • Purely leptonic decays: B- t- nt ,B0 t+ t- • B- K-n n • Semileptonic decay: B- D(*)t- nt • ... Only a limited selection of topics. ITEP Meeting

  4. Why FCNC decays? Flavour changing neutral current (FCNC) processes (like bs, bd) are fobidden at the tree level in the Standard Model. Proceed only at low rate via higher-order loop diagrams. Ideal place to search for new physics. ITEP Meeting

  5. Radiative Decays • Inclusive Br(bsg) |C7|, SF for |Vub| • BK*g isospin asymmetry (D+-) sign of C7 • Mixing induced CPV • Direct CPV in BXsg • BXdg red: discussed in this talk ITEP Meeting

  6. Inclusive Br(bsg) Motivation: measure |C7| and shape function parameters(from Eg spectrum for |Vub| extraction) Inclusive and semi-inclusive  ITEP Meeting 38 modes, 55% rate

  7. Inclusive Br(bsg) BF(B  Xsg, Eg>1.6 GeV)=(3.55±0.24+0.09 ±0.03) x 10-4 -0.10 • consistent with SM expectations (3.57±0.30) x 10-4 However: theory error is expected to get reduced by a factor of ~2 (NNLL calculations are under way) interesting for charged Higgs mass limit need a better measurement of inclusive rate Also: important to fix the value of Wilson coeff. C7 and to determine the spectrum shape. At 5 ab-1 : Egmin down to 1.5 GeV and stat. error ~5% ITEP Meeting

  8. mb C7 ms ms mb p+ p- KS trajectory B vertex IP profile g g BXsg CP Asymmetry • Sensitive to NP – right handed currents • Theoretically clean. • Standard Model “~Zero”. • g is polarized, and the final state is almost flavor specific. • Helicity flip ofgsuppressed by ~ms/mbS ~ 0.06 sin2f1 • Time dependent CPV requires vertex reconstruction with KSp+p- g Vertex recon. eff. at Belle 51% (SVD2), 40% (SVD1) Possible at e+e- B-factory ITEP Meeting

  9. B0KSp0g time dependent CPV • Atwood, Gershon, Hazumi, Soni, • PRD71, 076003 (2005) M(KSp0) < 1.8GeV/c2 • NP effect is independent of the resonance structure. Example: Belle 386MBB • Two M(KSp0) regions(MR1:0.8-1.0GeV/c2/MR2:<1.8GeV/c2) • 70+-11 (45+-11) events in MR1(2). S= +0.08 ±0.41 ±0.10 A= +0.12±0.27±0.10 Good tag (0.5<r<1.0) ITEP Meeting

  10. B0KSp0g time dependent CPV Results: Belle hep-ex/0507059 S(BK*g, K*KSp0)=-0.01 ±0.52 ±0.11 S(B KSp0g)=0.08 ±0.41 ±0.10 BaBar PRD 71 (2005) 0501103 S(BK*g, K*KSp0)=-0.21±0.40 ±0.05 Prospects: Add more modes:BKSfg(with angular analyisis), higher K resonances, BKShg(recent observation by BaBar),... Present Belle (stat./syst.) 5ab-1 50ab-1 Acpmix(BK*g, K*KSp0) 0.41 / 0.10 0.14 0.04 Acpdir(BXsg) 0.051 / 0.038 0.011 0.005 ITEP Meeting

  11. Acp(BXsg) vs SUSY models 50ab-1 5ab-1 Mixing CPV Direct CPV U(2) tanb=30 mSUGRA tanb=30 U(2) tanb=30 mSUGRA tanb=30 Acpdir Acpmix SU(5)+nR tanb=30 non-degenerate SU(5)+nR tanb=30 degenerate SU(5)+nR tanb=30 non-degenerate SU(5)+nR tanb=30 degenerate ITEP Meeting T. Goto, Y.Okada, Y.Shimizu,T.Shindou, M.Tanaka hep-ph/0306093, also in SuperKEKB LoI

  12. bd penguins • Interesting: • Measurement of |Vtd/Vts| • Addresses the same physics issue as Bs- Bs mixing(from a different perspective: box vs loop) • CP violation could be sizeable in SM (order 10%) • New physics could be quite different from b  sg Supressed by |Vtd/Vts |2vs b  sg Difference in dynamics Form factor ratio ITEP Meeting

  13. Belle: First observation of B rg, wg signal qq K*g other B Ref: PRL 96, 221601 (2006) Reconstructing rare B meson decays at Y(4s): use two variables, energy diference DEand beam constrained mass Mbc _ ITEP Meeting

  14. Vtd/Vtsfrom B rg, wg 68%CL r 95%CL Full UT fit The measured branching fraction BF(B r/wg)= 1.32 +0.34 (exp.) +0.10 (theo.) Translates to |Vtd|/|Vts| = 0.199 +0.026 (exp.) +0.018 (theo.) which is compatible with SM constraints based on fits of other CKM parameters. Ref: PRL 96, 221601 (2006) -0.31 -0.09 -0.025 –0.015 Together with the evidence of BK0 K decays modes,this demonstrates the existence of a new quark level transition: bd ITEP Meeting

  15. Implications of Belle’s observation of bd  • Comparison with the recent observation of Bs mixing at Tevatron: • green: Bellemeasurement of|Vtd/Vts|inbd  • yellow: CDF measurement of |Vtd/Vts|from Bs mixing The width of the Bsmixing contour islimited by theory whileBd γ needs much more data. ITEP Meeting

  16. bd future prospects • With 1-2 orders of magnitude more statistics (5 ab-1, 50 ab-1): • Direct CP violation and time-dependent CPV withBρ0 γ and B ωγ • Measurements of inclusive b  d γ ITEP Meeting

  17. B  K* l+ l- b  s l+l- was first measured in B K l+l- by Belle (2001). Important for further searches for the physics beyond SM Ci: Wilson coefficients ITEP Meeting

  18. l- l+ B B q q K* K* l+ l- Particularly sensitive: forward-backward asymmetry in K* l+l Backward event Forward event [γ* and Z* contributions in BK* l l interfere and give rise to forward-backward asymmetries c.f. e+e- + -] ITEP Meeting

  19. Sample used for AFB(BK*ll)(q2) Ref: PRL 96, 251801 (2006) Treat q2, cos(θ) dependence of bkgs. Sample for BK* l l: 113±13 events Unbinned fit to the variables q2 (di-lepton invariant mass) and cos(θ) for the BK* l l data. Fit parameters A9/A7 and A10/A7(Ai = leading term in Ci) ITEP Meeting

  20. Control sample BKll BK l l control sample: 96±12 events Consistent with flat Integrated asymmetry: ITEP Meeting

  21. * Constraints on Wilson coefficients from AFB(BK* l l)(q2) Projections of the full fit to q2, cos(θ) Integrated FB asymmetry J/y y’ Observed integrated AFB rules out some radical New Physics Models with incorrect signs/magnitudes of C9 and C10(red and pink curves) ITEP Meeting

  22. Results of the unbinned fit to q2 and cos(θ) distributions for ratios of Wilson coefficients. A10/A7 ＳＭ A9/A7 SM A10/A7 Best fit A9/A7 |A7| constrained from bs to be close to SM Ref: PRL 96, 251801 (2006) at 95% C.L. ITEP Meeting

  23. AFB(BK* l l)(q2), BaBar BaBar: 229 M BB PRD 73(2006) 092001  Integrated FB asymmetry AFB >0.55 (@ 95% CL) First bin excludes SM (blue) at 2s level? ITEP Meeting

  24. AFB(BK* l+ l-)[q2] at Super B Factory q02 Precision with 5ab-1 dC9 ~ 11% dC10 ~14% d q02/q02 ~11% 4AFB zero-crossingq02 will be determined with 5% error with 50ab-1 ITEP Meeting

  25. Purely leptonic decay Bt n • Proceed via W annihilation in the SM. • Branching fraction • Provide information of fB|Vub| • |Vub| from BXu l n fB cf) Lattice • Br(Btn)/Dmd |Vub| / |Vtd| • Expected branching fraction |Vub| = (4.39 ± 0.33)×10-3(HFAG) fB = (216 ± 22) MeV (lattice) • BF(B  t nt) = (1.59 ± 0.40)×10-4 ITEP Meeting

  26. H+/W+ t+ Charged Higgs contribution to Bt n ~ e0 =SUSY corrections to b Yukawa coupling Br(SM) ~ 1.59 x 10-4 ITEP Meeting

  27. Full Reconstruction Method • Fully reconstruct one of the B’s to • Tag B flavor/charge • Determine B momentum • Exclude decay products of one B from further analysis Decays of interest BXu l n, BKn n BDtn, tn B e- (8GeV) e+(3.5GeV) Υ(4S) p B full reconstruction BDpetc. (0.1~0.3%) Offline B meson beam! Powerful tool for B decays with neutrinos ITEP Meeting

  28. Fully reconstructed sample Belle (447M BB) 4.12x105 B0B0 + 6.80x105 B+B- ITEP Meeting

  29. Event candidate B- t- nt ITEP Meeting

  30. Bt n (Belle) hep-ex/0604018 - preliminary Obtained Eresidual • NBB (produced) = 447M • NB+B- (full recon.) = 6.80 x 105 (purity 0.57) • t decay modes • Cover 81% of t decays • Event selection • Main discriminant: residual ECL energy Fit to Eresidual 21.2+6.7signal events. 4.2σ significance including systematics -5.7 ITEP Meeting

  31. Impact of B- t- nt • From BF(B  t nt) Product of B meson decay constant fB andCKM matrix element |Vub|use |Vub| from HFAGfB • Use BF(B  t nt) with Dmd  constraint in the (r,h) plane The commonuncertainty from fBcancels in this ratio. ITEP Meeting

  32. Charged Higgs limits from B- t- nt If the theoretical prediction is taken for fB limit on charged Higgs mass vs. tanb ITEP Meeting

  33. Bt nprospects • Expected precision at Super-B • 13% at 5 ab-1 • 7% at 50 ab-1 • Search with D(*) l n tag will help.  BaBar 232M BBPRD73 (2006) 057101 • Tag eff ~ 1.75 x 10-3 • Signal selection eff. ~31% • Similar S/N to Belle (full recon. sample) ITEP Meeting

  34. If D|Vub| = 0 & DfB = 0 Future Prospects: B 95.5%C.L. exclusion boundaries DfB(LQCD) = 5% (for BFobs = BFSM) Extrapolations (T.Iijima) 50ab -1 rH

  35. B  t+t- • BaBar (232M BB) PRL96 (2006) 241802 • Challenging measurement: 2-4 neutrinos per event! • Fully reconstruct one B (D(*)X, X=combination of up to 5 pions and kaons), 280k events • t decay modes: lnn, p-n, r-n(51% of tt decays) • Reject events with KL,KS,K± and employ neural network (kinematics of charged track momenta and ECL residual energy) • 263±19 events (expect 281±40 from sidebands, MC) • BF(B t+t-) < 4.1 x 10-3 (90%CL)SM prediction: 0.12 x 10-6 •  First ever limit on this channel • Constrains leptoquark couplings and tanb enhancements ITEP Meeting

  36. B- K-n n • BK(*)ννis a particularly interesting and challengingmode (with B τνas a small background), theoretically clean • Experimental signature:B  K + nothing • The “nothing” can also be light dark matter with mass oforder 1 GeV. Direct dark-matter searches cannot see the M<10 GeV region. • SM prediction: (3.8+1.2) x 10-6 • B τν analysis is a proof that such a one prong decay can be studied at a B factory • Present limits: • BaBar (89M BB): BF(B+K+νν) < 52 x 10-6PRL 94 (2005)101801 • Belle (275M BB): BF(B+K+νν) < 36 x 10-6hep-ex/0507034 -0.6 ITEP Meeting

  37. B- K-n n prospects MC extrapolation to 50 ab-1 5s Observation of B± K±n n SM prediction: G.Buchalla, G.Hiller,G.Isidori (PRD 63 014015) Extra EM calorimeter energy Fig. From SuperKEKB LoI ITEP Meeting

  38. Charged Higgs search in BD t n c b Charged Higgs contribution H+/W+ t+ nt Decay amplitude Br(SM)~ 8 x 10-3 Tauonic decay is the most sensitive • Analysis:reject events with p, K, reject D*tn contamination, no remaining charged or p0 tracks, cut on the ECL residual energy, angle between two n’s and missing mass. ITEP Meeting

  39. BD t n (MC studies) • Signal selection efficiency 10.2% 2.6% 26.1% 13.3% • Expectation at 5 / 50 ab-1 for B+ decay 5s observation possible at 1ab-1 ITEP Meeting

  40. Form factor error BD t n constraint on charged Higgs Reach in R Once branching fraction is measured, we can determine R. M.Tanaka, Z.Phys. C67 (1995) 321 BF error  Reach in R: 11 at 5ab-1 ITEP Meeting

  41. BD t n  charged Higgs Constraint From bsg D(Form-factor) ~5% D(Form-factor) ~15% ITEP Meeting

  42. Super-B and LHCb: complementary • Clean environment  measurements that no other experiment can perform. Examples: CPV in BgfK0, Bgh’K0 for new phases, BgKSp0gfor right-handed currents. • “B-meson beam” technique  access to new decay modes; proof BgtnExample: discover BgKnn. • Measure new types of asymmetries. Example: forward-backward asymmetry in bgsmm, see • Rich, broad physics program including B, t and charm physics. Examples: searches for tgmg and D-D mixing with unprecedented sensitivity. LHCb LHCb LHCb ITEP Meeting

  43. Summary • Radiative,electroweak and tauonicB decays are of great importance to probe new physics. • We are starting to measure Btn, Dtn, AFB(K*ll), ACP(Kp0g) etc. at the current B factories. Hot topics in the coming years ! Watch out for updates (including this week)... • For precise measurements, we need a Super-B factory! Observe K(*)nn, zero crossing in AFB, D(*)tn Expected precision (5ab-150ab-1); • Br(tn): 13%7% • Br(D(*)tn): 7.9%2.5% • q02 of AFB(K*ll): 11%5% • ACP(Kp0g) tCPV: 0.140.04 ITEP Meeting

  44. Additional slides ITEP Meeting

  45. Charged Higgs from Br(bsg) ITEP Meeting

  46. Radiative decays: prospects Summary by M.Nakao1st Super-B workshopat Hawaii (2004) ITEP Meeting

  47. B- e- ne, m- nm • Helicity supressed with respect to B τν • B- m-nmSM prediction: 0.4 x 10-6 • (Possibly better for charged Higgs limits than tn at high stat) • Present limits: • Belle (152M BB): BF(B- m-nm) < 2 x 10-6hep-ex/0408132 • BaBar (89M BB): BF(B- m-nm) < 6.6 x 10-6PRL 92 (2005)221803 • B- e- neSM prediction: ~0.00001 x 10-6 • Present limit: • Belle (65M BB): BF(B- e- ne) < 5.4 x 10-6BELLE-CONF-0247 ITEP Meeting

  48. B- e+e-, m+m- • No new results from B factories... • BaBar (120M BB): BF(B  e+e-) < 0.083 x 10-6 BF(B m+m-) < 0.061 x 10-6 PRL94(2005)221803 • Belle (85M BB): BF(B  e+e-) < 0.19 x 10-6 BF(B m+m-) < 0.16 x 10-6 PRD68 (2003)111101 • .... With present statistics we could be competitive with Tevatron • Limits from Tevatron: hep-ex/0508058 • BF(Bdm+m-) < 0.032 x 10-6 SM prediction: 0.0001 x 10-6 • BF(Bsm+m-) < 0.12 x 10-6 SM prediction: 0.0035 x 10-6 ITEP Meeting

  49. BD t n (MC studies) • Use fully reconstructed samples. • t decay modes • Analysis cuts; • Reject events withp, KL • Reject D*t n contamination • No remaining charged or p0 tracks • ECL residual energy • Angle between two n’s • Missing mass Signal BG ITEP Meeting

  50. B  t nt hep-ex/0604018 - preliminary BF(B  t nt)=(1.06+0.34 (stat.) +0.18 (syst.)) x 10-4 -0.28 -0.16  Product of B meson decay constant fB andCKM matrix element |Vub| fB |Vub| = (7.73 +1.24 (stat.) +0.66 (syst.)) 10-4 GeV Using |Vub| = (4.39 ± 0.33)×10-3 from HFAG fB = (176+28 (stat.) +20 (syst.)) MeV First measurement of fB! fB = (216 ± 22) MeV (an unquenched lattice calc.) [HPQCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 212001 (2005) ] -1.02 -0.58 -23 -18 ITEP Meeting

More Related