1 / 31

Rare Decays at LHCb

Rare Decays at LHCb. Mitesh Patel (CERN) CERN Theory Institute LHC b Focus week Wednesday 28 th May 2008. From G. Hiller [ hep-ph/0308180 ]. Introduction. New physics can give effective Hamiltonian, H , new operators O i or modified Wilson coefficients C i

roger
Télécharger la présentation

Rare Decays at LHCb

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rare Decays at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) CERN Theory Institute LHC b Focus week Wednesday 28th May 2008

  2. From G. Hiller [hep-ph/0308180] Introduction • New physics can give effective Hamiltonian, H, new operators Oi or modified Wilson coefficients Ci • Rare B decays give a number of opportunities to constrain these contributions:

  3. Bs→mm

  4. Bs→mm • Bs→mm helicity suppressed • Well predicted in SM: • BR(Bs→mm) = (3.35±0.32)×10-9 [1] • Sensitive to (pseudo) scalar operators • MSSM: tan6β/MA4 enhancement • NUHM: favours large tanb (~30) • Current limits from Tevatron: • CDF BR < 4.7×10-8 90% CL [2] • D0 BR < 7.5×10-8 90% CL [3] NUHM • J. Ellis et al., arXiv:0709.0098v1 [hep-ph] [1] hep-ph/06040507v5 [2] arXiv:0712.1708v1 [hep-ex] [3] arXiv:0705.300v1 [hep-ex]

  5. Bs  μμ Bs KK • Mass (MeV) Bs→mm at LHCb • Searching for Bs→mm with LHCb: • Large prodn x-secn for b’s at high h, low pT → At L=2x1032 cm2s-1, 1012 bb pairs in 107s • Trigger has m pT threshold >~1GeV →~1.5kHz inclusive μ, di-μ • Small event size →Can write this rate out, open analysis – can retain max. efficiency • High precision magnetic spectrometer → Bs mass resolution ~20MeV (c.f. CMS ~40MeV, ATLAS ~80MeV) • Vertex detector very close to LHC beams → Excellent vtx, impact parameter resolution 100 mb 230 mb

  6. Invariant Mass PID Geometry Bs→mm at LHCb • Events classified according to geometrical likelihood, PID and Bs invariant mass: • Geometric likelihood: • Bs Lifetime • m SIPS: Mu Impact Parameter Significance • DOCA: Distance of closest approach • Bs IP: Bs impact parameter to prim. vtx • Isolation: No. of good secondary vtx that can be made with m candidates • PID: • Calibration muons (MIPs in calorimeter, J/y muons) • Bs Invariant Mass Arbitrary normalisation Red: signal Blue: bb inc. Black: b μ b μ Green: Bc+  J/Ψμν

  7. Bs→mm at LHCb • Analysis: • Signal description: B→hh (~200k events/2fb-1) • Background estimation from mass sidebands • Normalisation: B+→J/yK+ (2M events/2fb-1) • Dominant uncertainty on BR from relative Bs, B+ hadronisation fraction ~13% Red: signal Blue: bb inc. Black: b μ b μ Green: Bc+  J/Ψμν

  8. Bs→mm at LHCb • Background: • Dominated by b→μ, b→μ, b→μ, b→c→μ also contributes • Mis-id (B→hh), insignificant • Dominant exclusive bkgrd Bc+→J/Ymn, tiny cf. b→μ, b→μ • Drell-yan insignificant at these masses • Total efficiency for all geometric likelihood values ~10% • Taking events with GL>0.5, assuming SM BR, with 2fb-1: • Signal ~30 events • Bkgrd ~83 events Background Signal Geometric likelihood

  9. 90% CL limit on BR (only bkgrd is observed) 2x10-8 (~0.05 fb-1) 10-7 BR (x10–9) Expected final CDF+D0 limit Uncertainty in background prediction 5x10-9 (~ 0.4 fb-1) Integrated luminosity (fb–1) Exclusion: 0.1 fb–1 BR < 10-8 0.5 fb–1 < SM With SM Branching ratio 2 fb–1 3 evidence 6 fb–1 5 observation Bs→mm at LHCb SM prediction • J. Ellis et al., arXiv:0709.0098v1 [hep-ph] With 0.1fb-1 can measure BR 9 (15)×10-9 at 3 (5)s With 0.5fb-1 can measure BR 5 (9)×10-9 at 3 (5)s

  10. Bd→K*mm

  11. Bd→K*mm • BR measured at B-factories, in agreement with SM: BR(Bd→K*μμ)= (1.22+0.38-0.32)×10-6 [1] • Decay described by three angles (ql, f, qK*) • Angular distributions as function of q2gives sensitivity to NP contributions • Forward-backward asymmetry AFB in ql angle has received particular theoretical attention – predicted in a number of different models Ali et al, Phys. Rev. D61:074024, 2000 [1] PDG 2006

  12. AFB BELLE ’06 Mmm2 (GeV2) Bd→K*mm at LHCb • B-factories each collected O(100) signal events • CDF has ~35 signal events • Given projected total datasets these experiments, a total of <1000 events might be observed at all facilities • With L=2x1032 cm2s-1, LHCb will observe this no. of events with ~0.25fb-1 integrated luminosity AFB BABAR ’08 SM Mmm2 (GeV2) Wrong sign C9,C10 excluded ?

  13. Bd→K*mm at LHCb An example 0.1fb-1 experiment AFB • Signal selection: • Total selection efficiency ~1% → 7200 signal events /2fb-1 (~50% below mJ/Y) • Full AFB spectrum of interest but zero-crossing point often computed: • s0SM = 4.39+0.38-0.35 GeV2 [1] (older value used in model →) • Simple linear fit suggests precision: • Looking at extended beyond linear fit Mmm2 (GeV2) An example 0.5fb-1 experiment AFB Mmm2 (GeV2) [1] arXiv:0106067v2 [hep-ph]

  14. Bd→K*mm at LHCb bkgrd from: b→mb→m • Background: • b→μ, b→μ dominant contribution, symmetric distribution in ql– scales AFBobserved • b→μ, b→c→μ significant contribution, asymmetric qldistribution – effect on AFBdepends on ql shape • As for Bs→μμ, don’t observe any significant background from m mis-id • Non-resonant Kpmm events not yet observed • Bkgrd rejection dependent on Bd mass resoln: s(mBd) ~15MeV (c.f. ATLAS 50MeV) • B/S ~0.5 • Analysis issues: • In order to correct AFB value measured, require knowledge relative angular efficiency: • pT cuts on muons (in e.g. trigger), remove events with ql ~0,p • muon reconstruction requirements distort momentum spectrum No. of Events ql / rad bkgrd from: b→μ, b→c→μ No. of Events ql / rad

  15. FL AT(2) Bd→K*mm at LHCb 2fb-1 • Decays contain much more information than ql, AFBdistributions • Fitting projections of ql, f, qK* angular distributions: →fraction of longitudinal polarization, FL, and transverse asymmetry AT2 Mmm (GeV2) 2fb-1 Kruger & Matias, Phys. Rev. D71: 094009, 2500 Mmm (GeV2)

  16. Bd→K*mm at LHCb • Full angular fit also under investigation: • Parameterised in terms of transversity amplitudes • A0L,R, A┴L,R, A║L,R, 6 complex numbers • Correlations give access to helicities • Probe chiral structure NP operators • Once have enough events in each q2 bin for fit to converge → better precision on AFB, FL, and AT2 (but require full acceptance correction) • Can form any observable once have fitted all amplitudes – new theoretically clean observables with good NP sensitivity sought! AFB (SM, 2.2 – 4.1 GeV2) Full ang. fit (AFB) = 0.02 AFB (SM, 2.2 – 4.1 GeV2) Fit of proj. angles (AFB) = 0.04

  17. Bs→fg

  18. Bd→K*γ, Bs→fg • BR(Bd→Xsg) measured by B-factories, rate in agreement with SM • B-factories measured CP asymmetry ACPin Bd→K*(Ksπ0)γ : → C=-0.03±0.14, S=-0.19±0.23 [HFAG] • LHCb can perform analogous measurement in Bs→fg • As DGs≠0, Bs→fg decay probesAΔas well as C and S In SM, C=0 (direct CPV) S=sin 2y sin f AΔ=sin 2y cos f wherey fraction of “wrong” polarization

  19. Bs→fg at LHCb • Signal Selection: • ET > 2.7GeV • Mass resoln ~90MeV • Proper time resoln ~80fs (not critical for measuring AD) • Total Efficiency ~0.3% • Yield: • Bs→fg • 11k / 2fb-1 with B/S<0.55 • Bd→K*(K+p-)g • 68k / 2fb-1 with B/S~0.60 Equivalent of 13mins of simulated BB events – already see a peak! True K*g signal events Combinatorial background

  20. Bs→fg at LHCb • Analysis issues: • Acceptance function a(t) (Bd→K*g) • s(t) as function of topology • Precision on ACP parameters with Bs→fgdecays from 0.5fb-1 • s(AD) = 0.3 (no tagging required) • s(S, C) = 0.2 (require tagging) • With 2fb-1: • s(AD) = 0.22 • s(S, C) = 0.11

  21. Conclusions • Rare B decays in LHCb will find NP or constrain extensions of SM • With the first data: • Bs→μμ excluded at SM value with 0.5fb-1 • Bd→K*μμ measure AFBspectrum, σ(s0) ~0.8GeV2 with 0.5fb-1 • With 2fb-1 integrated luminosity: • Bs→μμ evidence if SM BR (observation with 6fb-1 data) • Bd→K*μμ measure AFBspectrum,σ(s0) ~0.5GeV2, new observables with more complex fits (A(2)T, …) • Bs →fγ CP asymmetry ACP→ fraction of “wrong” polarization • Host of other channels will be accessible: • Radiative : Lb→Lγ, Lb→ L*γ,B →r0g, B→wγ, mmg • b→sll :B+→K+ll (RK), Bs→fmm • LFV : Bq→ll’ • …

  22. Other Channels • Preliminary study of Bs→fmm: • Expect ~1000 signal events from 2fb-1 data with B/S<0.9 @ 90% CL • Factor 4 reduction in production rate Bs cf. Bd • The f does not tag the B → need flavour tagging, factor ~15 reduction → expect √60 worse resolution than Bd→K*mm • Can make CP-averaged measurement of AFB (if non-zero CPV) • Study of b→d transition Bs→K*mm also planned: • Again, factor 4 reduction in production rate Bs cf. Bd • Rate reduced by |Vtd/Vts|2=0.2082 ~ 1/25 • Given these reductions, expect will have to work harder to reduce background → ~< 700 events/ 2fb-1

  23. BsKK 1.0 fb -1 2 evt in s.r PID “Robustness” of mis-id bkg estimation: bb inclusive above GL = 0.2: 19 b  dimuon 3 other muons 2 muon + mis-id single mis-id probability needs to increase a factor ~10 to be of the same order as di-muon bkgrd • Double mis-id: • dominated by Bhh • ~4 evts/fb-1 a factor ~50 less than dimuon • Mis-id needs to increase by a factor ~7 to be of the same order as dimuon bkgrd

  24. RK in B+→K+ll • RKtheoretically well controlled in SM : • Effect of extensions to SM can be O(10%) e.g. from neutral Higgs boson exchange • Related to BR(Bs→mm) • LHCb sensitivity with B+→K+ll has been investigated – can also be done with the K* decay BaBar/Belle 95% CLlimit on RK CDF 95% CL limit on Bs  mm

  25. RK in B+→K+ll (cont’d) • From 10 fb-1 data : • Bd eeK ~ 10k • Bd mmK ~ 19k • Gives RK = 1 (fixed) ± 0.043 • Possible status with 10fb-1 data : • BR(Bs→mm) ~ 3×10-9 • RK ~ 1 – compatible with MSSM with small tan b • RK ≠ 1 – NP : right handed currents or broken lepton universality • BR(Bs→mm) ≠ 3×10-9 • RK ~ 1 – as above • RK = 1+e – MFV

  26. Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd Drawn for Mmm= 2 GeV • Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon • Shifts zero of AFB and larger theory errors • Region II: energetic Kp pair • Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp • Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion • Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics • Presently neglecting non-resonant background • Limit can crudely be derived from BaBar data → expect ~2000 events/2fb-1 (→ B/S=0.5±0.2) • Has been suggested that, under certain kinematic conditions, these can be treated as signal [Grinstein, Pirjol, hep-ph/0505155] :

  27. Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd (cont’d) Drawn for Mmm= 2 GeV • Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon • Shifts zero of AFB and larger theory errors • Region II: energetic Kp pair • Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp • Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion • Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics • Presently neglecting non-resonant background • Limit can crudely be derived from BaBar data → expect ~2000 events/2fb-1 (→ B/S=0.5±0.2) • Has been suggested that, under certain kinematic conditions, these can be treated as signal [Grinstein, Pirjol, hep-ph/0505155] :

  28. Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd (cont’d) Drawn for Mmm= 2 GeV • Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon • Shifts zero of AFB and larger theory errors • Region II: energetic Kp pair • Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp • Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion • Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics • Presently neglecting non-resonant background • Limit can crudely be derived from BaBar data → expect ~2000 events/2fb-1 (→ B/S=0.5±0.2) • Has been suggested that, under certain kinematic conditions, these can be treated as signal [Grinstein, Pirjol, hep-ph/0505155] :

  29. Kpmm (non-resonant) K*mm signal Mmm ~ 2GeV Mmm ~ 2GeV Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd (cont’d) • However, isolating region II has a large effect on the signal yield: Have relaxed the K* mass cut for signal and NR events • E.g. separating regions at Ep=600MeV : find 27% signal events and 44% NR events in region II

  30. Kpmm (non-resonant) K*mm signal Mmm ~ 2GeV Mmm ~ 2GeV Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd (cont’d) • However, isolating region II has a large effect on the signal yield: Have relaxed the K* mass cut for signal and NR events • E.g. separating regions at Ep=600MeV : find 27% signal events and 44% NR events in region II

  31. Kpmm (non-resonant) K*mm signal Whole Mmm range Whole Mmm range Bd→K*mm –non-resonant bkgrd (cont’d) • However, isolating region II has a large effect on the signal yield: Have relaxed the K* mass cut for signal and NR events • E.g. separating regions at Ep=600MeV : find 27% signal events and 44% NR events in region II • Plan to measure dG/dmKp

More Related